Bhai saab It's effective only when Our Viki will come near your shore and your JF-17s have AWACS cover. Else JF-17s radar won't be even able to lock Viki then how come launch missile on it. But then again I also don't think that handful of Mig-29Ks(12-14) will really do anything in case of land strike. Atleast not until there are 25 Mig-29Ks and which is only possible with 2 CBGs.Yes we have CM-400 AKG and Exocet Anti ship missiles.
And this story is taken from a Bollywood director/writer?
the article u quoted mentions that the missile hits target at 4 mach.the very same article mentions that ur airforce describes it a hyper sonic which means >5mach so whats correct??too many contradictions..do u have any footage of the missile being tested either by ur airforce or by china??in any case the article describes that missile can hit "fixed or slow moving" targets..so is it really effective against our carrier???and that too with a range of 250 km??leave hitting the ship can it even track the ship let alone its course??Yes we have CM-400 AKG and Exocet Anti ship missiles.
lolz missile hyper sonic ha .. 24 mig take off bhi ni lay paye gy ..aur sach ma kia tumhay pata bhi ha aik AC pay k sy attack kia jata ha ?:?
New Recruit
O bhai your JF-17 radar can't even detect Viki when its powerful EW suite is on, let alone launch missile on it. See even aircrafts like Su-33, IL-38's radar couldn't detect it a single time as it made them blind some 400 Kms away, when EW suite was on and I am sure Su-33 or IL-38 have much better and powerful radars than JFT.indian shor machaye gy ab
lolz missile hyper sonic ha .. 24 mig take off bhi ni lay paye gy ..aur sach ma kia tumhay pata bhi ha aik AC pay k sy attack kia jata ha ?:?
Its an english forum so try and reply in english.indian shor machaye gy ab
lolz missile hyper sonic ha .. 24 mig take off bhi ni lay paye gy ..aur sach ma kia tumhay pata bhi ha aik AC pay k sy attack kia jata ha ?:?
Oh damn! Chinese cruise missiles to hit moving targets like ships and ACs?Gimme a break! This technology has not even been perfected yet by the US and is only in the testing stages. Probably take a couple of years more to iron out the bugs and make it operational.
This new seeker employing Electronic Support Measures (ESM) was recently tested with the Raytheon Tomahawk Block IV cruise missile, as part of the weapon’s product improvement program. The new seeker will enable the cruise missile to engage moving or relocatable targets, including ships or mobile surface-to-air missile sites, identified by their unique electromagnetic signature.
The new seeker can automatically locate and track moving and stationary targets by sensing the electro-magnetic radiation they emit (i.e. radar, communications etc).
So, according to the Chinese and their fan boys, they've stolen a march over the Americans in missile technology!! That's nuts!
I really did fall on my a$$ laughing!!
Very good question. I'll put it in a nutshell. You can't destroy an AC with the usual cruise missile. You'd need a big explosive warhead to do that which means a massive increase in the weight of the missile. Which means maneuvering the missile by its intrinsic guidance systems in the terminal phase from stand off OTH ranges on a moving target, which is extremely difficult due to the missile's mass and kinetic energy, unlike the much smaller, lighter and easily maneuverable SAMs, AAMs, ATGMs etc.
