A role for India in rebuilding Syria

[RISING SUN]

I'm merely point out that the living condition in war torn Syria is not necessarily better than peaceful India. That is a totally valid point. As that is the case, why is India "rebuilding " another country when it should focus on itself. I feel bad for Indians when Indian politicians or press talk about help others when India is far worse off.

@waz @Zaki @Manticore @Oscar please check and do the needful.

How is it off topic? You have to take sides in this Syrian war. He was talking about our taking
Saudi Arabia side in this war. I said that our interest with SA is because of large number of Indian expats in that country not because of who they are supporting in this Syrian crisis.

Because this thread is not about war, rather it is about Indian efforts in reconatruction.

 

[Jugger]

Indian should rebuild Syria after the civil war is over, but should never get involved in the conflict. Rebuild Syria just like Afghanistan and the people of Syria will have gratitude for India.

 

[my2cents]

Because this thread is not about war, rather it is about Indian efforts in reconatruction.

First the crisis has to subside before we can to begin postwar reconstruction in Syria. Our role right now is wait and watch who emerges victorious in this crisis before we put a dime in reconstruction.

 

[EgyptianAmerican]

@waz @WAJsal @Oscar could you ask this poster to limit his social commentary on India's Caste system, sanitation, movie clips etc to the thread I specifically created for him and NOT troll EVERY SINGLE India thread please?

How is he trolling? He is making an obvious statement and is entitled to such a one. If he says it would be better to invest in your own country than he is right and has a right to say such things regardless if it's an "indian" thread or not.

 

[AntiToxic]

Anyway, did you leave china because of fear of being shot in back side of your head with bullet money recovered from your bank account?

He is not even from China.. he is stateless . he is from taiwan... which has no country status,, must have kicked out of taiwan for supporting china..

 

[Peshwa]

How is he trolling? He is making an obvious statement and is entitled to such a one. If he says it would be better to invest in your own country than he is right and has a right to say such things regardless if it's an "indian" thread or not.

LOL!
Why is it so "obvious"?
Does the poster in question have any inside information on the deal? Does he have ANY information on whether this deal is private or government initiated?! Does he have any authority to make claims on the "disadvantages" of this endeavor? Because that would make for an argument.

I suppose your contention is that until countries solve their sanitation problem, they are not entitled to take up projects/investments that benefit them monetarily or politically, is it?
I suppose you also believe that sanitation has prevented the rise of india to one of the fastest growing economies in the world, right?!

So which one is it? Since you're vouching for him, maybe you can answer

He is not even from China.. he is stateless . he is from taiwan... which has no country status,, must have kicked out of taiwan for supporting china..

More like a commie hiding in democratic clothing!

 

[EgyptianAmerican]

LOL!
Why is it so "obvious"?
Does the poster in question have any inside information on the deal? Does he have ANY information on whether this deal is private or government initiated?! Does he have any authority to make claims on the "disadvantages" of this endeavor? Because that would make for an argument.

I suppose your contention is that until countries solve their sanitation problem, they are not entitled to take up projects/investments that benefit them monetarily or politically, is it?
I suppose you also believe that sanitation has prevented the rise of india to one of the fastest growing economies in the world, right?!

So which one is it? Since you're vouching for him, maybe you can answer

India regardless of how much you breed does not make it a good idea to suddenly start investing in countries that aren't your own.

We all have to accept the harsh reality ,that, there is poor infrastructure, improper sanitation, lack of awareness among the people and poor access to health care.

That is a fact.

You also have a problem with wealth inequality.

This Is Just How Unequal India Is
New report from Oxfam highlights how the country’s wealth is concentrated in the hands of a few
http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2017/01/17/this-is-just-how-unequal-india-is/

The Real Loser in India’s Biggest Corporate Battle: Shareholders
The fight over Tata Group reaches an end after costing its companies billions in value
http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2017...indias-biggest-corporate-battle-shareholders/

India Is No Longer the World’s Fastest-Growing Large Economy, IMF Says
China took back in the crown in 2016 thanks ‘primarily’ to Modi’s cash cancellation
http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/...-the-worlds-fastest-growing-economy-imf-says/

Davos
India no longer the world's fastest-growing economy: IMF
http://money.cnn.com/2017/01/16/news/india/imf-world-economic-outlook-india-china/

India set for slowest growth period as demonetization dents economy
http://www.cnbc.com/2017/01/17/indi...utive-quarters-of-below-7-percent-growth.html

How India Broke Its Economy (on Purpose)
http://fortune.com/2016/12/26/india-demonetization-rupee-notes/

Considering your economy maybe you should not throw cash(joke intended) at Syria.

Regardless he has every right to comment whatever he wants. Regardless if he wishes to go in-depth. He has the right to comment on whatever you post. Deal with it.

 

[Peshwa]

India regardless of how much you breed does not make it a good idea to sudden;y start investing in countries that aren't your own.

We all have to accept the harsh reality ,that, there is poor infrastructure, improper sanitation, lack of awareness among the people and poor access to health care.

That is a fact.

You also have a problem with wealth inequality.

This Is Just How Unequal India Is
New report from Oxfam highlights how the country’s wealth is concentrated in the hands of a few
http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2017/01/17/this-is-just-how-unequal-india-is/

The Real Loser in India’s Biggest Corporate Battle: Shareholders
The fight over Tata Group reaches an end after costing its companies billions in value
http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2017...indias-biggest-corporate-battle-shareholders/

India Is No Longer the World’s Fastest-Growing Large Economy, IMF Says
China took back in the crown in 2016 thanks ‘primarily’ to Modi’s cash cancellation
http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/...-the-worlds-fastest-growing-economy-imf-says/

Davos
India no longer the world's fastest-growing economy: IMF
http://money.cnn.com/2017/01/16/news/india/imf-world-economic-outlook-india-china/

India set for slowest growth period as demonetization dents economy
http://www.cnbc.com/2017/01/17/indi...utive-quarters-of-below-7-percent-growth.html

How India Broke Its Economy (on Purpose)
http://fortune.com/2016/12/26/india-demonetization-rupee-notes/

Considering your economy maybe you should not throw cash(joke intended) at Syria.

Regardless he has every right to comment whatever he wants. Regardless if he wishes to go in-depth. He has the right to comment on whatever you post. Deal with it.

No one is questioning his right to comment, so chill out on that line of reasoning.

My objection is to the fact that india cannot/should not invest because it has sanitation issues or inequality in the spread of wealth!
If this deal was somehow a "charity" or aid, we can understand your sentiment. But it clearly is not! It's, a loan for all intents and purposes that's settled in the currency of the host country. It provides us goodwill and a fixed interest rate, not to mention exposure for international projects for Indian MNCs.
There are clear advantages to such a move.
So if you or your patron Chinese fellow can describe how india comes out losing in this, thus taking away from the "needy" in india, then we can debate. If we end up making money, doesn't it mean it's more money we can spend on the needy?

Now please, let's hear from you how this deal is hurting india. I'm very interested!

PS: on a seperate note, the whole Indian demonetization situation is our business. We are smart enough to make our own decisions on investments. Again, unless you have some information that states that india can't afford it. Also, seems you lack understanding of the fact that demonetization does not affect india business interests abroad whatsoever!

 

[EgyptianAmerican]

No one is questioning his right to comment, so chill out on that line of reasoning.

My objection is to the fact that india cannot/should not invest because it has sanitation issues or inequality in the spread of wealth!
If this deal was somehow a "charity" or aid, we can understand your sentiment. But it clearly is not! It's, a loan for all intents and purposes that's settled in the currency of the host country. It provides us goodwill and a fixed interest rate, not to mention exposure for international projects for Indian MNCs.
There are clear advantages to such a move.
So if you or your patron Chinese fellow can describe how india comes out losing in this, thus taking away from the "needy" in india, then we can debate. If we end up making money, doesn't it mean it's more money we can spend on the needy?

Now please, let's hear from you how this deal is hurting india. I'm very interested!

Why do you ask me Hindutva? Have you no brain on your own? Is there anything upstairs? Hello?


Syria is still an an open war-zone with ISIS making various offenses. Are you willing to spend large amounts of money on security forces? Fences? Walls? Weapons? Cameras? and that is if Assad allows you to station troops in Syria.

Also you have to clean up waste and hazards which has built up over decades of wars and negligence.

Not only that but think about the infrastructure you would have to build with such constructions systems.

The constructions teams in Syria will most likely be lazy and try to prolong constructions as much as possible to squeeze as much money as possible from you.

This endeavor would be extremely expensive. Not only that but you would become an even bigger target for terrorists. Your pockets of constructions would be easily targeted and over run by ISIS or Al Nursa then what? They will blow your buildings sky-high then you would need to start from scratch again.

You would also become a target for ISIS in your home country. ISIS or any other Jihadist group for that matter can easily convince one of those many disfranchised Indian Muslims. In the end you will regret but then again, do I care? Not really.

After the Syrian War: A Huge, Costly Cleanup
http://www.voanews.com/a/after-the-syrian-war-a-huge-costly-cleanup/3286024.html

 

[Peshwa]

Why do you ask me Hindutva? Have you no brain on your own? Is there anything upstairs? Hello?


Syria is still an an open war-zone with ISIS making various offenses. Are you willing to spend large amounts of money on security forces? Fences? Walls? Weapons? Cameras? and that is if Assad allows you to station troops in Syria.

Also you have to clean up waste and hazards which has built up over decades of wars and negligence.

Not only that but think about the infrastructure you would have to build with such constructions systems.

The constructions teams in Syria will most likely be lazy and try to prolong constructions as much as possible to squeeze as much money as possible from you.

This endeavor would be extremely expensive. Not only that but you would become an even bigger target for terrorists. Your pockets of constructions would be easily targeted and over run by ISIS or Al Nursa then what? They will blow your buildings sky-high then you would need to start from scratch again.

You would also become a target for ISIS in your home country. ISIS or any other Jihadist group for that matter can easily convince one of those many disfranchised Indian Muslims. In the end you will regret but then again, do I care? Not really.

After the Syrian War: A Huge, Costly Cleanup
http://www.voanews.com/a/after-the-syrian-war-a-huge-costly-cleanup/3286024.html

Yawn!

So except for imaginary will, may and might scenarios, you are as useless as tits on a bull!
Not wasting my time on you! Welcome to my ignore list!

 

[EgyptianAmerican]

Yawn!

So except for imaginary will, may and might scenarios, you are as useless as tits on a bull!
Not wasting my time on you! Welcome to my ignore list!

Imaginary? Someone is clearly delusional, thank you for proving some Indian stereotypes for me. Simply can't understand the facts. It's sad.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

How about a role for India in killing ISIS and FSA too ?

right now its limited to supplying explosives,detonators and meds to daesh.
https://defence.pk/threads/indian-explosives-found-in-syria.205480/

 

[Stag112]

right now its limited to supplying explosives,detonators and meds to daesh.
https://defence.pk/threads/indian-explosives-found-in-syria.205480/

Like how Japan supplies Toyota trucks to Taliban?

That's pretty lame from you.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Like how Japan supplies Toyota trucks to Taliban?

That's pretty lame from you.

Trucks vs explosives..

Even a vegabond with money can buy a truck... but can he buy explosives or detonators?
Indian companies must be makin a killin.


not even jokin.

 

[Stag112]

Trucks vs explosives..

Even a vegabond with money can buy a truck... but can he buy explosives or detonators?
Indian companies must be makin a killin.


not even jokin.

The thread you posted is about industrial explosives legally exported by India. They are exported to many coubtries and to Syrian govt too in the region. The thread proves NOTHING.

If industrial explosives are being used for war (big IF) then so can a knife which anyone can buy or a Toyota truck. Besides no proof we exported them to terrorists.

How many Taliban weapons are China made?