Hindu temple trusts are NOT managed by Hindus.
They are Managed by GOVT of the state.
So as per you the Isamic invasion was an invasion by Fund Managers
5,450 tonnes of free rice to 2,985 mosques, 47 temples have to pay rupees 10 crores: TN govt. order
- Thread starter Andhadhun
- Start date
Hindu temple trusts are NOT managed by Hindus.
They are Managed by GOVT of the state.
So as per you the Isamic invasion was an invasion by Fund Managers
xeuss
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2019
- Messages
- 4,355
- Reaction score
- 6
- Country
- Location
Hindu temple trusts are NOT managed by Hindus.
They are Managed by GOVT of the state.
So as per you the Isamic invasion was an invasion by Fund Managers
They are still managed by Hindus who report to the state.
Nope, they are managed by people nominated by politicians who are put there to help them skim money and further their political agenda. The nominees couldn't care less about the Hindus or Hinduism.
In kerala they are managed by communists.
xeuss
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2019
- Messages
- 4,355
- Reaction score
- 6
- Country
- Location
But still Hindus.
Hindus who report to the state means they re run by the STATE.
Otherwise by your logic since Hindus were employed by the British govt. , there was no British Raj in India. So now you can start calling it "hindu Raj".
xeuss
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2019
- Messages
- 4,355
- Reaction score
- 6
- Country
- Location
If Hindus selected by the Hindu majority state cannot run a Hindu temple properly, then that is the fault of the Hindus.
Wow...some people are really dense.
It IS the fault of the "secular" Hindus and we acknowledge it as much. I suppose it will take MORE Hindutva to set the temples free. Not less.
AfrazulMandal
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2018
- Messages
- 3,289
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
Hindus in Hindu Rastra are looting Hindu temples.
I highly suggest turning it over to us. May be the Peace Foundation can make better and more equitable use of the resources. No more milk in the drains. Everyone will be happy.
xeuss
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2019
- Messages
- 4,355
- Reaction score
- 6
- Country
- Location
So you mean to say Hindutvawadi Hindus are not powerful enough?
Man you guys are bigger pussies than we thought.
AfrazulMandal
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2018
- Messages
- 3,289
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
Was there any doubt?
No.
lol.
He who laughs last, laughs best.
After Madras HC Finds TN Order Asking Temples To Donate To CM’s Covid Fund Untenable, State Govt Withdraws It
by M R Subramani - May 04, 2020, 7:01 pm
The Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments (HR&CE) Department today (4 May) withdrew its order on transferring Rs 10 crore of funds from Hindu temples in the State to the Chief Minister’s Covid-19 Relief Fund, after the Madras High Court found it "not legally tenable".
A Madras High Court public interest litigation (PIL) bench, comprising Justices Vineet Kothari and Pushpa Sathyanarayana, found the 22 April order untenable while taking up three petitions against the 22 April HR&CE order for hearing.
The judges found merit in the argument of the counsel of T R Ramesh, President, Hindu Temple Worshippers Society, who sought a stay on the order. Besides Ramesh, Tamil daily Dinamalar editor R R Gopaljee and another person, too, had a filed PIL against the HR&CE circular.
The Department’s issued a fresh circular immediately withdrawing its 22 April order.
Ramesh told Swarajya that the judges accepted his contention that the HR&CE Commissioner could not pass a circular under Section 36-B of HRCE Act, 1959 when he himself was the sanctioning authority.
Section 36-B of HRCE Act, 1959 is on utilization of temples surplus funds for making contributions towards funds for the purpose of feeding the poor (annadhan). This section was introduced by the Tamil Nadu government in 1983 under The Tamil Nadu Act.
Ramesh argued that under Sec 36-B the trustees of temples had to seek the HR&CE Commissioner’s approval for utilizing temple funds. In turn, the Commissioner had to publish the request and seek comments from the devotees.
In this instance, the Commissioner issued a circular on the utilization of funds that he himself would have to sanction, the petitioner argued, resulting in the judges accepting the order was “not legally tenable”.
The State Government counsel told the bench that the HR&CE Commissioner would withdraw the order and file an affidavit on 9 May (Friday) but the judges said it would perhaps have to issue a fresh one withdrawing the earlier one.
The HR&CE Department then issued the order in the afternoon saying that it was withdrawing the earlier order for “administrative reasons”.
The HR&CE order led to a hue and cry being raised in Tamil Nadu against the ruling All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam government.
This was in view of the Edappadi K Palaniswami government milking the temples of their funds even as it offered 5,450 tonnes of rice free of cost to mosques.
Already, the Tamil Nadu government had wanted to legalize squatters on temple lands before the Madras High Court stepped in to stay the order, drawing criticism from devotees of temples.
The state government has termed the landholdings of the temples as “unwanted lands” in the court while seeking to vacate the stay.
https://swarajyamag.com/news-brief/...-covid-fund-untenable-state-govt-withdraws-it
Will you be visiting the Ram Mandir in Ayodhya ?
xeuss
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2019
- Messages
- 4,355
- Reaction score
- 6
- Country
- Location
So a secular Hindu court had to stand up and correct the wrong. Thank God for the secular Hindus.
This just confirms that Hindutvawadis are pussies. They can only scream "modern day jazia"
Similar threads
