Arabs invasion of India - Long Story Short

Ind4Ever said:

WE had lots of tiny tribes Kingdom in sindh provinces itself and check thisthe Indians were far superior to the other nations inhabiting the area at that time. Especially the Greek soldiers were told of a formidable power on the Ganga. Obviously it was the kingdom of Magadha ruled by the Nandas who maintained an army far outnumbering that of Alexander. So, despite the repeated appeals of Alexander to advance, the Greek soldiers did not budge an inch

HE JUST SAW THE TRAILER !!! Most powerful kingdoms than Nadas wr there in other parts of India ....
MIGHTY NATION


Yea and Shias and Sunni where fighting crown . Later Shia leader escaped to Iraq ? But later again recaptured and killed by Sunnis . Am I right ?

Click to expand...

Bornubus said:

Even Prithviraj was just a Feudal lord

Click to expand...

Indian Patriot said:

He was no feudal lord. But if I start revealing the true history many Indians would go mad with anger, particularly the Rajputs. So let us believe what we think is history.

Click to expand...

Indian Patriot said:

Arabs never got beyond Sindh. Arabs are notorious losers who rarely won wars. It was the non-Arab muslims who kept Islam flag flying.

Muhammed Ghaznavi was a Turk not Arab. The Seljuks were a central Asian nomadic tribe that was Islamised and later became Ghazis. The Mameluks were the "slave" turks. Babur was a Chagtai Turk who also claimed lineage from Genghiz Khan ( which is doubtful, lineage from Genghiz was considered a mater of pride for Central asian warlords).

Click to expand...

Indian Patriot said:

It took place during the battle for succession which happened after the death of the prophet.

@levina Ji, aap kaise ho?

Click to expand...

Indian Patriot said:

Islamic invaders could never set foot in the eastern mountains of India. Ladakh, Darjiling, North-Eastern states of India were always free of Islamic rule.



Not sure about all the details, I guess its the Battle of Karbala which is the root.

Click to expand...

Bornubus said:

If i quote noted indian historian He wasn't even even killed in the battle of Tarain

Click to expand...

Ind4Ever said:

Arabs invasion of India

they got attracted by the riches of India.

Western India the necessary resources to conquer India.

• The Arabs learnt the figures from one to nine (Indian numerals), which Europeans learnt later from the Arabs as

Invasions of Mohmud Ghazni
Mohmud of Ghazni invaded India 17 times. His motive was to plunder the riches of Indian temples. In 1026, he plundered the famous Somnath temple in Gujarat.

Invasions of Mohammad Ghori
Muizzuddin Mohammad-bin-Sam (Mohammed of Ghori) invaded India out of territorial ambitions.

Arabs invasion of India

Click to expand...

levina said:

Am good, thanks for asking. How about you?

Click to expand...

Indian Patriot said:

Chauhan was not killed in Tarain, some reports even claim he was never killed at all. He and his family were enslaved and kept as prisoners and some of his family relations converted and were given small jagirs and they later faded into oblivion.

The tall fable of Chauhan killing Ghori is just that, a myth.

Click to expand...

p4kistan said:

INDIA, INDIAN, WESTERN INDIA

SORRY TO BURST YOUR BUBBLE THERE WAS NO INDIA THEN

HIND YES INDIA NO.

Click to expand...

Ind4Ever said:

Brilliant !!!

Click to expand...

Indian Patriot said:

Babur was a Chagtai Turk who also claimed lineage from Genghiz Khan ( which is doubtful, lineage from Genghiz was considered a mater of pride for Central asian warlords).

Click to expand...

Jaggu said:

Babur is said to be descended from Chingiz Khan from his mother's side of family while from his fathers side he was descended from Timur lane. It would not be out of the question for him being an actual descendant of Chingiz Khan, it is estimated that 1 in 200 people in the world are his direct descendants.

Click to expand...

p4kistan said:

THANKS

Click to expand...