What, possibly, Mr. Chandu Chohan reveal?

[MM_Haider]

So, as per media reports and official statements from India and confirmation by Her Excellency Maleeha Lodhi, one of Indian soldiers has been captured alive (though no official confirmation from ISPR) as India tried to do adventure in Azad Kashmir.

There are couple of postulates and theories in my mind as to why ISPR has not confirmed it.

1. PA doesn't want to confirm that Indians did cross LoC. OR
2. PA wants him to use as a bait to trade off someone. And/OR
3. He will be used at some appropriate forum to spill the beans that Indians were ordered to attack Pakistani military bases instead of terrorist camps as claimed by India. And also he can reveal the death toll India suffered while retreating/ advancing or both.
4. He may provide eye witness account of Uri incident as to who carried out attack etc and number of casualties (Sheikh Rasheed revealed that death toll at Uri was 177) ..

I am confused because as IA has shown to the world that they did carry out a surgical strike at Pakistani soil why is PA silent to show to the world the dead bodies of soldiers and the captured jawan? Isn't it high time! Hit the iron when it is hot.., what possibly Chandu can reveal and why is ISPR silent since yesterday? Why is there no retaliation openly as India did (False flag or not, this is different story)??

 

[Papa Dragon]

So, as per media reports and official statements from India and confirmation by Her Excellency Maleeha Lodhi, one of Indian soldiers has been captured alive (though no official confirmation from ISPR) as India tried to do adventure in Azad Kashmir.

There are couple of postulates and theories in my mind as to why ISPR has not confirmed it.

1. PA doesn't want to confirm that Indians did cross LoC. OR
2. PA wants him to use as a bait to trade off someone. And/OR
3. He will be used at some appropriate forum to spill the beans that Indians were ordered to attack Pakistani military bases instead of terrorist camps as claimed by India. And also he can reveal the death toll India suffered while retreating/ advancing or both.
4. He may provide eye witness account of Uri incident as to who carried out attack etc and number of casualties (Sheikh Rasheed revealed that death toll at Uri was 177) ..

I am confused because as IA has shown to the world that they did carry out a surgical strike at Pakistani soil why is PA silent to show to the world the dead bodies of soldiers and the captured jawan? Isn't it high time! Hit the iron when it is hot.., what possibly Chandu can reveal and why is ISPR silent since yesterday? Why is there no retaliation openly as India did (False flag or not, this is different story)??

You mentioned Sheikh Rasheed revealed that the death toll at Uri was 177. How did he come up with such claim and is he mentioning the possible civilian death toll or just the # of soldiers killed in the attack?

 

[MM_Haider]

You mentioned Sheikh Rasheed revealed that the death toll at Uri was 177. How did he come up with such claim and is he mentioning the possible civilian death toll or just the # of soldiers killed in the attack?

In yesterday's program at dunya tv (I think) he was indicating an eye witness account who saw 177 coffins .. looking at the India's outrage it seems that the death toll at Uri was remarkable ..

 

[Papa Dragon]

In yesterday's program at dunya tv (I think) he was indicating an eye witness account who saw 177 coffins .. looking at the India's outrage it seems that the death toll at Uri was remarkable ..

If the death toll was 177, the reaction would've been on a whole new level and just wouldn't stop with surgical strikes and cross border firings. GOI is under tremendous pressure from the public and to act on Pakistan due to 26/11, Pathankot and Uri was where they had no other option but to react. Well I wouldn't want to go into the troll fest and fights of keyboard warriors that no surgical strikes took place or there have been 8-14 causalities on the Indian side due to cross border firing but I can say that if it was 177, all hell would break loose from both sides. Also, the attack took place on an army base that too by 4 terrorists, so it would be impossible for them to kill 177 jawans.

 

[MM_Haider]

If the death toll was 177, the reaction would've been on a whole new level and just wouldn't stop with surgical strikes and cross border firings. GOI is under tremendous pressure from the public and to act on Pakistan due to 26/11, Pathankot and Uri was where they had no other option but to react. Well I wouldn't want to go into the troll fest and fights of keyboard warriors that no surgical strikes took place or there have been 8-14 causalities on the Indian side due to cross border firing but I can say that if it was 177, all hell would break loose from both sides. Also, the attack took place on an army base that too by 4 terrorists, so it would be impossible for them to kill 177 jawans.

That's what his point was .. that the attack happened when unit shift was changing .. and that caused most of the damage .. whatever is the case it would be interesting to listen to Chandu when ISPR will release his tape like Kal Bhishan Yadav ..

 

[Taimoor Khan]

I dont think a 22 year old could reveal that much. At max, a good war trophy, a way to humiliate the Indians further.

 

[N.Siddiqui]

In yesterday's program at dunya tv (I think) he was indicating an eye witness account who saw 177 coffins .. looking at the India's outrage it seems that the death toll at Uri was remarkable ..

Have seen that interview, he is famous or rather infamous in India relating to his contacts in Kashmir, himself supports Kashmir struggle. He quoted a person or two who was present in Uri, maybe a staffer, helper, anyone else. He also said Uri was an Indian Army brigade headquarter, not just any army camp. Also he said there was this ceremony taking place, change of Unit/staff with new unit/staff taking place and the attacks happened at this point in time.

Here is the interview..check at 4.55 onwards.

 

[hussain0216]

How high he can scream

 

[Cash GK]

If the death toll was 177, the reaction would've been on a whole new level and just wouldn't stop with surgical strikes and cross border firings. GOI is under tremendous pressure from the public and to act on Pakistan due to 26/11, Pathankot and Uri was where they had no other option but to react. Well I wouldn't want to go into the troll fest and fights of keyboard warriors that no surgical strikes took place or there have been 8-14 causalities on the Indian side due to cross border firing but I can say that if it was 177, all hell would break loose from both sides. Also, the attack took place on an army base that too by 4 terrorists, so it would be impossible for them to kill 177 jawans.

mind you he is Kashmiri himself.. and he has family there and he has deep link inside indain kahmir

 

[MM_Haider]

If the death toll was 177, the reaction would've been on a whole new level and just wouldn't stop with surgical strikes and cross border firings. GOI is under tremendous pressure from the public and to act on Pakistan due to 26/11, Pathankot and Uri was where they had no other option but to react. Well I wouldn't want to go into the troll fest and fights of keyboard warriors that no surgical strikes took place or there have been 8-14 causalities on the Indian side due to cross border firing but I can say that if it was 177, all hell would break loose from both sides. Also, the attack took place on an army base that too by 4 terrorists, so it would be impossible for them to kill 177 jawans.

Watch at 4:00

I dont think a 22 year old could reveal that much. At max, a good war trophy, a way to humiliate the Indians further.

When they humiliate Indians further ... I believe this is the time .. why yo wait for tomorrow?

 

[coffee_cup]

Here it is:

"Oh Pah G, maaf kar deiN.....,

The ch**** sitting on top didn't tell me what kind of Chitrol you do to those who come here for "SirGKal" strike.

Haaye oye Modi, marwa ditta.... now please stop doing ChitroKal strike on my arse...".

 

[Soumitra]

1 You have not captured some colnel or brigadier who will have operational information. he is just a jawan who will have limited info. As per Geneva convention you will have to release him eventually

2 177 Dead This person has mixed two three correct things with a big falsehood
Let me make it clear
(i) Yes Uri has a brigade headquarter but No the Attack did not take place there but in an adjesant Army Camp
(ii) Yes the attack took place when there was a shift change going on
(iii) 18 soldiers died in the attack. 17 at the time of attack and 18th succumbed to his injuries later. We have the names and details of all the soldiers

 

[MM_Haider]

1 You have not captured some colnel or brigadier who will have operational information. he is just a jawan who will have limited info. As per Geneva convention you will have to release him eventually

2 177 Dead This person has mixed two three correct things with a big falsehood
Let me make it clear
(i) Yes Uri has a brigade headquarter but No the Attack did not take place there but in an adjesant Army Camp
(ii) Yes the attack took place when there was a shift change going on
(iii) 18 soldiers died in the attack. 17 at the time of attack and 18th succumbed to his injuries later. We have the names and details of all the soldiers

Geneva convention applies to the PoWs not on someone who is captured while an adventure is being staged by enemy army. be prepared for the news that he will rot in Pakistani jail for the rest of his life. Only Modi is responsible for ruining his life in order to satisfy Hindutava doctrine and war hysteria... insofar as your other points are concerned, you are merely toeing the line of your establishment.. no comments on that!

 

[Md Akmal]

You mentioned Sheikh Rasheed revealed that the death toll at Uri was 177. How did he come up with such claim and is he mentioning the possible civilian death toll or just the # of soldiers killed in the attack?

@ India has the tendency to hide the fact. In Bangladesh in 2000, at Boroibari (North of Mymensingh District) near about 300 to 400 Indian soldiers were killed but in media only 16 came up.

 

[JonAsad]

Why no picture of that soldier from either side? -