What's new

"Ashok" -- Mythical Creation of 3 British Colonialists

Prehistoric people of nepal were newa who had indo-aryan roots and spoke "nepalbhasha" written in prehistoric devanagari script of prehistoric india.

All the tribes in himalayan region were not necessarily mongloids.

Give me link... no blog or any bull$hit.... authentic source.
 
Here is Rg Veda, the father of all vedas.... born in 1700–1100 BC.

Check it out... your own source.

Rigveda - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

---------- Post added at 06:13 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:12 AM ----------



Any proof for the claim that Buddha was a Caucasoid? or you are just doing some mental Mast***bation

That makes it atleast 3700 years old.. thanks for the info anyway.

Now who is having a mental *** bation . :rofl::rofl:
 
Last edited:
Here is Rg Veda, the father of all vedas.... born in 1700–1100 BC.

Check it out... your own source.

Rigveda - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

---------- Post added at 06:13 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:12 AM ----------



Any proof for the claim that Buddha was a Caucasoid? or you are just doing some mental Mast***bation

Buddha was never claimed as Mongoloid (of course except by YOU). And let me remind you old India is not having Mongoloids that time mostly people were Aryans/Dravidian. Nepal was that time under Mauryan empire regime and Buddha's father was king. Mongoloids first in any form came in India as Kushan and that time it was 125 AD.
 
I don't think Buddha was a Caucasoid.

He was born in Kapilavastu in Nepal and he was a Mongoloid. Thats why his ideology was accepted by the Asians (Mongoloids) easily.

Wrong argument there Commie. Nepalis are a mixture of mongoloid (Gorkhas and other ethnicity) and Indo-Aryans. I suppose you haven't met or seen any Nepali.
 
Wrong argument there Commie. Nepalis are a mixture of mongoloid (Gorkhas and other ethnicity) and Indo-Aryans. I suppose you haven't met or seen any Nepali.

Well lets show them the most famous Nepali in India



 
I think all have run away... another ruppee news BS busted!!!!!!!!!!!
 
so british who themselves were christians created a new religon for Indians called Hinduism

and the same british created a legend for Indians to feel proud of their ancestory not of British culture.

Seems like stupid way to rule people.
 
Its quite possible that like with anything else that old, lots of legends and myths have got mixed with reality. Like people challenge whether prophets existed, whether they recd god's word (zero evidence), whether confucius existed etc etc.

Whats interesting is nepali maoists claiming Buddha as one of their own LOL. Thats precious!!!
 
Last edited:
Wrong argument there Commie. Nepalis are a mixture of mongoloid (Gorkhas and other ethnicity) and Indo-Aryans. I suppose you haven't met or seen any Nepali.

Aryan my foot... let me see how long will you remain Aryan...

Already the Northern population is shrinking...

Have any idea about the South Indian Negroid population?

Only one decade, india will be de-Aryanized...

---------- Post added at 06:36 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:35 AM ----------

Its quite possible that like with anything else that old, lots of legends and myths have got mixed with reality and also. Like people challenge whether prophets existed, whether they recd god's word (zero evidence), whether confucius existed etc etc.

Whats interesting is nepali maoists claiming Buddha as one of their own LOL

Who are you? Tamil.... or any BC?
 
Aryan my foot... let me see how long will you remain Aryan...

Already the Northern population is shrinking...

Have any idea about the South Indian Negroid population?

Only one decade, india will be de-Aryanized...

---------- Post added at 06:36 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:35 AM ----------



Who are you? Tamil.... or any BC?

Doesnt matter if we de aryanized............ what we are interested in today is being Indians. Nothing more nothing less. we have an identity of being indians not some bull crap.
 
Doesnt matter if we de aryanized............ what we are interested in today is being Indians. Nothing more nothing less. we have an identity of being indians not some bull crap.

Say that to the nigger who called me nepali maoist...
 
I dont think Ashoka was mongolid...i think nepal was ruled by rajput monarchy which itself is of aryan blood.
I think north india itself has small population but how is it de aryanizing?are south indian marrying north indias or wat?
Thanks.
 
Say that to the nigger who called me nepali maoist...

which of the 2 is offending

being a nepali or being a maoist. i am really sorry i did not got your point. maoist are correct to a point till their demads but their ways are wrong.
 
I dont think Ashoka was mongolid...i think nepal was ruled by rajput monarchy which itself is of aryan blood.
I think north india itself has small population but how is it de aryanizing?are south indian marrying north indias or wat?
Thanks.

nothing of that sort. there are marriges between south and north but the trend is not much because of so many diffrences of language and all. nothing of that sort. even it gets de aryanized it does not matter.
 

Back
Top Bottom