What's new

United Hindu Concern claims targeted killings orchestrated by AL

Never said I support BAL. My view is aligned with gov (Hope you understand the difference between supporting gov and supporting party). And anti BNP/JeI. And never said ppl are anti BD if someone takes anti BAL position. Quote me back if Im bashing someone for his anti BAL position. Many times I quote back against rumours, fallacy and anti national posts. Im only hardcore anti BNP because my family was affected by its terrorism. 75's takeover and alienating and 2001-06 terrorism. Also some of my family members took part to assassinate Zia.



If valid points are made no problems but cant live with hypocrite and liars. Its a moral position. BNP in the past silenced opposition views on gun points and bombs, so they shouldnt expect much decency in reality. BNP's nationalism is based on killing AL and they are proud of it. So both cant co exist in BD. They are living on poles apart. One has to go. Or a better solution is to get rid of 75's power grabbing beneficiaries. That makes Zia family the target. If BNP can get rid of Zia family, only that way all parties can sit together. Can expect BNP wont run out of leadership if they get rid of unwanted elements.



Jamaat as alliance of BNP, there is no way to think they are different but should be considered they are talking for one another. People talked in this very forum about many weird things how they will kill AL and anti independence posts etc. Your sweet talks maybe start but not hold much value in present scenario of BD. Though I dont see problems if pro independence people make their points of Islamic identity.


Bongbang it is a shame you do not see the irony of what you are stating.

Your position is extreme. BNP is intricately linked to Zia family they are going nowhere as is BAL with Mujibs family. Both are terrible and dynestic rule must end. Given your particular family history I guess your position is understandable but until you find common ground with other BD your stand will remain as extreme BAL fringe opinion and totally unrepresentative of BD population as a whole.
 
What kind of idiot are you. Doing cheerleading for jamaati munshi and asking me to lay off Awami weed. Do you think anyone can make sense talking with him. That will need some weirdest skills to silence their brainwashed mind. I suggest you to quote from something fresh discussion or not. Most of the time you just dont make any sense anyway, so I just ignore you.

Me cheerleading Munshi? Are you still high? :lol:

Jokes aside, it still doesn't explain how the US has stakes on Hasina. This is NOT to say that the US doesn't have any stake in Bangladesh. Global affairs does not run around nepotism.

And even if Munshi is a Jamaati, do you seriously believe that will end an ideology? For real?

This is the 21st century, and not the 60's or 70's. Wake up.
 
Last edited:
Jokes aside, it still doesn't explain how the US has stakes on Hasina. This is NOT to say that the US doesn't have any stake in Bangladesh. Global affairs does not run around nepotism.

That is no joke. That is trolling. That is your purpose here. Let me know on which pot you always remain so high. Check my post again, I said US vowed to work with BD in this region. Why did you just jump in overlooking the firstline? or third line that gov is in strong position in gov power internationally? or didnt quote him for any of his statements? Because you guys cant tilt the brainwashed people a bit but think that liberals are soft targets and easy to bash. This is how this forum works. That troll always pulls all kinds of conspiracy from his behind and mixes with other. With an iota of iq you didnt have any problem to understand the discussion and content. Or you really believed your guru's words US and India going to invade BD :lol:
 
That is no joke. That is trolling. That is your purpose here. Let me know on which pot you always remain so high. Check my post again, I said US vowed to work with BD in this region. Why did you just jump in overlooking the firstline? or third line that gov is in strong position in gov power internationally? or didnt quote him for any of his statements? Because you guys cant tilt the brainwashed people a bit but think that liberals are soft targets and easy to bash. This is how this forum works. That troll always pulls all kinds of conspiracy from his behind and mixes with other. With an iota of iq you didnt have any problem to understand the discussion and content. Or you really believed your guru's words US and India going to invade BD :lol:

First off, he's not my guru. Why are you so obsessed with him?

Secondly, intervention and invasion are two completely different meanings. So, your point there is moot.

And thirdly, I specifically criticized your post stating the they are working with the government due to family. That is not how international relations work. I see the nerd-rage worked out well there.

It just goes on to show that you cannot stand by anything you say. You criticize and even insult others, and yet you couldn't handle criticism or even trolling from others? If that is the case, then there's really no point for you of being here.

And FYI, I have criticized conservatives here before. I have criticized Munshi. Ask him and ask @Al-zakir if you don't believe. So, do not assume you understand me. You really don't. And that comrade is called arrogance - Pretending to know something when you clearly do not.

I think that you are a very tragic person bongbang. The perfect reflection of what is wrong with the politics of Bangladesh - an endless cycle of vindication, violence and vengeance. You think we wanted this? Is this what we fought for? Is this your vision? Is this your 'Sonar Bangla'?

And lastly, I do believe in secularism, social development and tolerance. But, not like this.
 
First off, he's not my guru. Why are you so obsessed with him?

Secondly, intervention and invasion are two completely different meanings. So, your point there is moot.

And thirdly, I specifically criticized your post stating the they are working with the government due to family. That is not how international relations work. I see the nerd-rage worked out well there.

It just goes on to show that you cannot stand by anything you say. You criticize and even insult others, and yet you couldn't handle criticism or even trolling from others? If that is the case, then there's really no point for you of being here.

And FYI, I have criticized conservatives here before. I have criticized Munshi. Ask him and ask @Al-zakir if you don't believe. So, do not assume you understand me. You really don't. And that comrade is called arrogance - Pretending to know something when you clearly do not.

I think that you are a very tragic person bongbang. The perfect reflection of what is wrong with the politics of Bangladesh - an endless cycle of vindication, violence and vengeance. You think we wanted this? Is this what we fought for? Is this your vision? Is this your 'Sonar Bangla'?

And lastly, I do believe in secularism, social development and tolerance. But, not like this.

Overcoming the hate some Bangladeshis have for Pakistan may be difficult. But today most Pakistanis are very retrospective and critical about their role in Bengal in 71 and the preceding years. We have in our history a gaping hole where half the country was sacrificed just for Bhutto's lust for power and Yahya Khan's combativeness.

I know Bengal once believed in a Pakistan, in a land built for Muslims, all muslims of the subcontinent. There were figures so patriotic towards the newly formed Pakistan in Bengal that their patriotism outstripped those of Punjab. Some names of Muslim League leaders include Khwaja Nizamuddin and Fazlul Haq. Even Hindus like Jogindar Nath Mandal stood with the Muslim League. So what changed by 71? The language riots? Agartala? What divided two brothers so brutally?

Weren't both our forefathers on the same page-that a free land was required for muslims of the subcontinent and not a land based on the ethnic group of one people. Because if this was so then Bengal Sindh, Punjab and Balochistan would be formed rather than one Pakistan. Your forefathers trusted and believed in Pakistan and I don't have to be a mullah or enemy of secularism to realize this. I am from a simple Lucknowi family that migrated due to severe oppression to Pakistan. Entire generations of us muslims were butchered to make Pakistan. I cannot forget this. Thus Bengal's division in my heart is the bleakest and saddest chapter in Pakistani history.

It was mostly our fault-west Pakistan's fault but rather than independence shouldn't we have thought of a compromise and punishment of the people involved? As part of Pakistan today at least I believe Yahya Khan Tikka Khan and others would have received punishment-at least stripped of their honors. The division did not let us realize the size of the problem and attrocities our people had done on Bengal including urdu speakers who imposed urdu on Bengalis.

Now India clearly came to Bengals rescue but it had vested interests in mind. It's real purpose was to break the power of Pakistan which unified was untouchable for them. And if it was so eager to stop oppression against Bengalis by West Pakistanis then why does it still after 60 years treat Kashmir with oppressive violent policies. 93000 have died in Kashmir since 89. So the important question is if India was so noble then why does it still treat parts of its territory in the same way we west Pakistanis treated Bengal.

So the sympathy expressed by some members, like Bongbang for India is not understandable. They had their own interests in mind of breaking the only potential muslim superpower rather than sympathy for Bengal and the atrocities we west Pakistanis comitted. They are not the saviors some Bengalis see them to be. Loki is right to mention that Bengal is unfortunately following a policy of 3 things one of which is vengeance which I agree.

I mean how long will it take Bengal to forgive west Pakistanis most of whom did not even know what was going on in Bengal? Will we ever realize that once our forefathers fought for the same Pakistan that Mujib Ur Rehman abandoned?

Also if it comes to attrocities Germans killed east Germans, Congans are still killing Congans, La volencia was common in columbia and Hutu Tutsi massacred each other-probably in much higher proportions than west Pakistanis did in Bengal. None of them have asked for independence but rather a more inclusive leadership.

@bongbang @Al-zakir @mb444 @bluesky @MBI Munshi
 
Last edited:
First off, he's not my guru. Why are you so obsessed with him?

Secondly, intervention and invasion are two completely different meanings. So, your point there is moot.

And thirdly, I specifically criticized your post stating the they are working with the government due to family. That is not how international relations work. I see the nerd-rage worked out well there.

It just goes on to show that you cannot stand by anything you say. You criticize and even insult others, and yet you couldn't handle criticism or even trolling from others? If that is the case, then there's really no point for you of being here.

And FYI, I have criticized conservatives here before. I have criticized Munshi. Ask him and ask @Al-zakir if you don't believe. So, do not assume you understand me. You really don't. And that comrade is called arrogance - Pretending to know something when you clearly do not.

I think that you are a very tragic person bongbang. The perfect reflection of what is wrong with the politics of Bangladesh - an endless cycle of vindication, violence and vengeance. You think we wanted this? Is this what we fought for? Is this your vision? Is this your 'Sonar Bangla'?

And lastly, I do believe in secularism, social development and tolerance. But, not like this.

Maybe Ive harshly replied to you because of some past encounters. And settled some points, you yourself know this if you can remember 8-) Basically I observe and show my tolerance for one or two occasion then I act. So maybe you misunderstood my stand and took my tolerance as weakness. Hasina's family members are not only US UK citizens, but also white ones. That holds some value. I will stick to my opinion. Hasina represents the secular liberal people and her family members are western citizens, that is a deadly combination these days. For example see how US reacted in case of killing of desi bloggers and how they acted on US citizen blogger and how they acted on Xulhaz who was US embassy employee and western LGBT activist. You took only one line from my quote and made an issue out of it but I wanted show those statements as combination. Taking out one line may not make any sense. Also US policy shifted from balancing between Pakistan and India to India centric only. So they may not help pro Pakistan BNP as they did to Zia in the past and were harsh on SM fearing Soviet expansion but Hasina is successful balancing between all world powers. I dont know where from these intervention or invasion wet dream even coming. And btw they have some similar meanings if you want to use that way.


So the sympathy expressed by some members, like Bongbang for India is not understandable.

Bro most Pakistanis have no clue what is going on here, so why you guys just poke your nose if you have no clue?
 
Overcoming the hate some Bangladeshis have for Pakistan may be difficult. But today most Pakistanis are very retrospective and critical about their role in Bengal in 71 and the preceding years. We have in our history a gaping hole where half the country was sacrificed just for Bhutto's lust for power and Yahya Khan's combativeness.

I know Bengal once believed in a Pakistan, in a land built for Muslims, all muslims of the subcontinent. There were figures so patriotic towards the newly formed Pakistan in Bengal that their patriotism outstripped those of Punjab. Some names of Muslim League leaders include Khwaja Nizamuddin and Fazlul Haq. Even Hindus like Jogindar Nath Mandal stood with the Muslim League. So what changed by 71? The language riots? Agartala? What divided two brothers so brutally?

Weren't both our forefathers on the same page-that a free land was required for muslims of the subcontinent and not a land based on the ethnic group of one people. Because if this was so then Bengal Sindh, Punjab and Balochistan would be formed rather than one Pakistan. Your forefathers trusted and believed in Pakistan and I don't have to be a mullah or enemy of secularism to realize this. I am from a simple Lucknowi family that migrated due to severe oppression to Pakistan. Entire generations of us muslims were butchered to make Pakistan. I cannot forget this. Thus Bengal's division in my heart is the bleakest and saddest chapter in Pakistani history.

It was mostly our fault-west Pakistan's fault but rather than independence shouldn't we have thought of a compromise and punishment of the people involved? As part of Pakistan today at least I believe Yahya Khan Tikka Khan and others would have received punishment-at least stripped of their honors. The division did not let us realize the size of the problem and attrocities our people had done on Bengal including urdu speakers who imposed urdu on Bengalis.

Now India clearly came to Bengals rescue but it had vested interests in mind. It's real purpose was to break the power of Pakistan which unified was untouchable for them. And if it was so eager to stop oppression against Bengalis by West Pakistanis then why does it still after 60 years treat Kashmir with oppressive violent policies. 93000 have died in Kashmir since 89. So the important question is if India was so noble then why does it still treat parts of its territory in the same way we west Pakistanis treated Bengal.

So the sympathy expressed by some members, like Bongbang for India is not understandable. They had their own interests in mind of breaking the only potential muslim superpower rather than sympathy for Bengal and the atrocities we west Pakistanis comitted. They are not the saviors some Bengalis see them to be. Loki is right to mention that Bengal is unfortunately following a policy of 3 things one of which is vengeance which I agree.

I mean how long will it take Bengal to forgive west Pakistanis most of whom did not even know what was going on in Bengal? Will we ever realize that once our forefathers fought for the same Pakistan that Mujib Ur Rehman abandoned?

Also if it comes to attrocities Germans killed east Germans, Congans are still killing Congans, La volencia was common in columbia and Hutu Tutsi massacred each other-probably in much higher proportions than west Pakistanis did in Bengal. None of them have asked for independence but rather a more inclusive leadership.

@bongbang @Al-zakir @mb444 @bluesky @MBI Munshi


What happened is in the past. Forgiveness can not really happen until a formal apology is given and exchequer in this case the gold reserves of Pakistan at that that time proportionately split.

I know Musharraf expressed regret but unfortunately that fell too short of what was needed.

At a government level current BAL governments Pakistan bashing is a ploy to divert attention away from its illegitimacy and failures. Over the next few years expect this to get worse.

From a people perspective BD interest in Pakistan is perfunctory.

In the interest of the Muslim of the subcontinent I believe it is necessary for BD and Pakistan to work together.

People are fully aware of the history but as a independent state you can understand why the Pakistani era is not particularly emphasised.

The reality is BD and PK does not really need each other critically for anything. Together they would be greater than the sum of their parts but with populations in hundreds of millions the two wings are huge entities in their own right. Although I wish it otherwise the current situation of PK unable and unwilling to do what is necessity to mend the fence and BAL continuing to flog the ****-bogeyman for its failures the chasm separating the people of once single nations grows deeper as days go by.

All one can hope for is cordial mature relationship develops but I would not hold my breath. I for one would not wish for any level of enhanced relationship between the nations until at least the gold reserve issue is resolved. Apology to me is irrelevant as it has no practical value.

Summary... PK and BD are immature nations lead by morons who do not know their own interests and are slaves to their respective ego and damn their people and future.
 
What happened is in the past. Forgiveness can not really happen until a formal apology is given and exchequer in this case the gold reserves of Pakistan at that that time proportionately split.

Pakistan's policy on Bengal has forever been flawed. I agree to this. It includes the hyping up of the Agartala conspiracy and presenting the Mujib Ur Rehman government as anti Pakistan in the beggining when it was anything but. The isse could easily be resolved by accepting his government and then the gold reserve issue wouldn't even exist.

I know Musharraf expressed regret but unfortunately that fell too short of what was needed.

I think apology is very much politicized. ZAB, expressed apology and layed a wreath on the grave of Bengali freedom fighters. Then other leaders followed suit and accepted Bengal as a country. Of course Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto being the architect of the Bengal massacre-his apology meant nothing but at least Bengalis should with a sympathetic heart accept the apologies of other leaders.

But in reality apology cannot bring back dead people. Before killing professors with the Islamic sanction that they were Hindu or Liberalized to view Hindus positively we forever created a schism not only between Bengal and Pakistan but also between Bengali Muslims and Hindus which still exists today.

At a government level current BAL governments Pakistan bashing is a ploy to divert attention away from its illegitimacy and failures. Over the next few years expect this to get worse.

Just like not accepting Biharis is a political move by the government of Pakistan, to refuse responsibility for the Bengal crisis when indeed it is responsible. I really wish history had been different. Far different.

From a people perspective BD interest in Pakistan is perfunctory.

True

In the interest of the Muslim of the subcontinent I believe it is necessary for BD and Pakistan to work together.

I agree.

People are fully aware of the history but as a independent state you can understand why the Pakistani era is not particularly emphasised.

Yes. I see. But it is unfair. Forgetting our time together as one state united against Indian hegemony which even Bengal supported. A nation built on the basis of religion rather than ethnicity however I believe is always stronger than one which is though.

The reality is BD and PK does not really need each other critically for anything. Together they would be greater than the sum of their parts but with populations in hundreds of millions the two wings are huge entities in their own right. Although I wish it otherwise the current situation of PK unable and unwilling to do what is necessity to mend the fence and BAL continuing to flog the ****-bogeyman for its failures the chasm separating the people of once single nations grows deeper as days go by.

It does not need each other but I do not agree with the statement that east and west Pakistan was separated by an entire body of a hostile nation named India in the middle. If this was so then gibralter and reunion would not be under British French control nor could they have held India for so long. At that time the demand of Indians was British citizenship not independence.

I agree that repetition and constant thinking of history from the Bengal perspective is causing a divide between the 2 nations. As is Pakistani refusal to abandon its negative thinking of Bengal. Its Bangladesh's choice which government to elect and it is clear we did not punish Niazi Tikka Khan or Yahya Khan for what they did in Bengal. For the military 71 is the bleakest chapter in Pakistan.

All one can hope for is cordial mature relationship develops but I would not hold my breath. I for one would not wish for any level of enhanced relationship between the nations until at least the gold reserve issue is resolved. Apology to me is irrelevant as it has no practical value.

I really hope Bengal and Pakistan deal with their differences. Pakistan should take the lead role in both apologizing and expressing sympathy for the people of Bengal.

Summary... PK and BD are immature nations lead by morons who do not know their own interests and are slaves to their respective ego and damn their people and future.

I tend to agree fully here.
 
Pakistan should take the lead role in both apologizing and expressing sympathy for the people of Bengal.

Good. Work on accomplishing that FIRST before diving in to whine about Muslims in Lucknow and India at any given opportunity. Because your concerns seem really empty, hollow and hypocritical given you have flag of Pakistan flying under your username.
 
Good. Work on accomplishing that FIRST before diving in to whine about Muslims in Lucknow and India at any given opportunity. Because your concerns seem really empty, hollow and hypocritical given you have flag of Pakistan flying under your username.
India has been part of similar atrocities in Kashmir as well as Lucknow. So acting all cocky will not get you anywhere. Kashmiris want freedom from India. Why are they not being freed if you believe in this? There were entire muslim innocents butchered outside the Andhra Pradesh high courts who have received no justice just as the muslims of Gujarat haven't. It is unfair that for west Pakistan's atrocities the nation was torn apart while for India's atrocities no such thing happened.
 
India has been part of similar atrocities in Kashmir as well as Lucknow. So acting all cocky will not get you anywhere. Kashmiris want freedom from India. Why are they not being freed if you believe in this? There were entire muslim innocents butchered outside the Andhra Pradesh high courts who have received no justice just as the muslims of Gujarat haven't. It is unfair that for west Pakistan's atrocities the nation was torn apart while for India's atrocities no such thing happened.

It was enjoyable talking to local muslim kashmiri policemen when I was there. They had some choice words for your lot, lets leave it at that. Its fun talking with Kashmiris (especially the Shias) about what Pakistan did in 1971 to the Bengalis and what it meant for 2 nation theory. Its really too easy to have them prefer India well above Pakistan. I mean just look at how many vote in Indian elections. They are well aware a vote means next to nothing in Pakistan which has seen more years of military rule in its history and has just recently completed its first peaceful civilian transition of power (making it an exception to the rule). They are becoming increasingly aware in greater number of the economic opportunities in India compared to Pakistan and the stability and respect the name India brings worldwide each passing year. More and more Kashmiris join our defence forces, civil service, engineers, scientists and doctors....things found in greater demand in India compared to Pakistan....as evidenced by India putting more and more distance between itself and Pakistan economically. How much it must pain you to know that....but you can deny it all you want if it helps you sleep better :D.

A few fringe elements that support Pakistan and terrorism does not alter the reality of the majority who live peacefully and prosper in the Indian union. Just like we dont judge all Pakistanis to be like fringe groups like Taliban....its not wise to judge all or most Kashmiris as pro-Pakistan....especially after what Pakistan shamed itself in doing in 1971 to fellow muslims (not that the abuse on minorities is somehow more justified either)...and how Pakistan's Shias, minorities and non-Punjab ethnicities continue to suffer in all sorts of ways for all kinds of reasons.
 
It was enjoyable talking to local muslim kashmiri policemen when I was there. They had some choice words for your lot, lets leave it at that. Its fun talking with Kashmiris (especially the Shias) about what Pakistan did in 1971 to the Bengalis and what it meant for 2 nation theory. Its really too easy to have them prefer India well above Pakistan. I mean just look at how many vote in Indian elections. They are well aware a vote means next to nothing in Pakistan which has seen more years of military rule in its history and has just recently completed its first peaceful civilian transition of power (making it an exception to the rule). They are becoming increasingly aware in greater number of the economic opportunities in India compared to Pakistan and the stability and respect the name India brings worldwide each passing year. More and more Kashmiris join our defence forces, civil service, engineers, scientists and doctors....things found in greater demand in India compared to Pakistan....as evidenced by India putting more and more distance between itself and Pakistan economically. How much it must pain you to know that....but you can deny it all you want if it helps you sleep better :D.

A few fringe elements that support Pakistan and terrorism does not alter the reality of the majority who live peacefully and prosper in the Indian union. Just like we dont judge all Pakistanis to be like fringe groups like Taliban....its not wise to judge all or most Kashmiris as pro-Pakistan....especially after what Pakistan shamed itself in doing in 1971 to fellow muslims (not that the abuse on minorities is somehow more justified either)...and how Pakistan's Shias, minorities and non-Punjab ethnicities continue to suffer in all sorts of ways for all kinds of reasons.
You don't need to tell me about how muslims think when my entire family has lived in Lucknow for generations. Some have merged in the Indian fabric but the majority still feel the Indian nationality is imposed on them. If this is the situation in our Lucknow then imagine the situation in Kashmir where the sentiment for independence is far more common. Hiding things will not work anymore. At least the Pakistanis are looking within- they criticize their faults and problems including 71 but I have never even seen a single Indian admit that there have been atrocities committed against us muslims of Lucknow.

And note that the situation in Pakistan is temporary. As comparison 93000 have been killed in Indian Kashmir while 60000+ have been killed in Pakistan in the war on terror. In the past India was the victim of terrorism and intolerance far worse than Pakistan.

Lets admit it what do we Lucknowis have in common with India? Our religion is different, our forefathers completely supported the muslim league in its demand for Pakistan and we have relatives on both sides. The people who support India are confused. They do not realize the path for the betterment of us is with Pakistan. I agree there are such people but there exist still many who have no love for India as muslims. My grandfather on my mothers side was the chief Ansari to be advocating a Pakistan and supporting it. He married almost every daughter to settled Pakistanis on the other side even though he wasn't going to see them since. I know about muslim sentiment more than a Hindu eager to hide the oppression of Kashmiris
 
You don't need to tell me about how muslims think when my entire family has lived in Lucknow for generations. Some have merged in the Indian fabric but the majority still feel the Indian nationality is imposed on them. If this is the situation in our Lucknow then imagine the situation in Kashmir where the sentiment for independence is far more common. Hiding things will not work anymore. At least the Pakistanis are looking within- they criticize their faults and problems including 71 but I have never even seen a single Indian admit that there have been atrocities committed against us muslims of Lucknow.

And note that the situation in Pakistan is temporary. As comparison 93000 have been killed in Indian Kashmir while 60000+ have been killed in Pakistan in the war on terror. In the past India was the victim of terrorism and intolerance far worse than Pakistan.

Lets admit it what do we Lucknowis have in common with India? Our religion is different, our forefathers completely supported the muslim league in its demand for Pakistan and we have relatives on both sides. The people who support India are confused. They do not realize the path for the betterment of us is with Pakistan. I agree there are such people but there exist still many who have no love for India as muslims. My grandfather on my mothers side was the chief Ansari to be advocating a Pakistan and supporting it. He married almost every daughter to settled Pakistanis on the other side even though he wasn't going to see them since. I know about muslim sentiment more than a Hindu eager to hide the oppression of Kashmiris

We dont care for your propaganda about Lucknow muslims.....all Lucknowis here have already laughed at your silly assertions many times....yet you keep flogging it like a dead horse....and you wont stop or change. Its good comedy.

So you brought in numbers. What was the death toll for Bangladeshi civilians in 1971 at hands of Pak military? What number do you claim for that one?

More and more muslims prefer India, its only natural....as religion becomes less important/dominating and people want to get along with making money and a living. It's why there are 56 countries in between India and Pakistan in the fragile/failed states index (with Pakistan ranking near the bottom).

It must anger you to see Kashmiri muslims joining Indian army in greater numbers. They hunt down Pak sponsored terrorists with great ferocity. Then their relatives stand in line and vote in elections, elections that do not happen in Pakistan administered Kashmir which is under direct military rule and appointment. They welcome and host Indian tourists and enjoy their higher than average lifestyle in India....and send their kids to good schools across the country....who then become integrated with India even more.

Its good the last vestiges of pro-Pakistan ideology are sending their daughters blindly to Pakistan. We don't want their lineage or spawn here in India....good riddance and may it happen more to accelerate the current trend of mainstream muslims integrating peacefully and patriotically with India.

The spirit of Maulana Azad, Bacha Khan and many others live on. It gives you a special burn I know.
 
We dont care for your propaganda about Lucknow muslims.....all Lucknowis here have already laughed at your silly assertions many times....yet you keep flogging it like a dead horse....and you wont stop or change. Its good comedy.


So you brought in numbers. What was the death toll for Bangladeshi civilians in 1971 at hands of Pak military? What number do you claim for that one?
I have already acknowledged our countries negative role in Bengal. But even Bengalis understand that Islam was sacrificed due to the dispute which India made full advantage of. As I said treat Kashmiris better then talk about Bengal. India is getting away with Kashmir because it is a much smaller population but oppression there is severe.
More and more muslims prefer India, its only natural....as religion becomes less important/dominating and people want to get along with making money and a living. It's why there are 56 countries in between India and Pakistan in the fragile/failed states index (with Pakistan ranking near the bottom).

I have never seen any other people so vain as are the Indians of today. A few years back you were in a state of sporadic decline. Its not about money. If you think bribing or telling tales of India's economy will win over us muslims you are wrong. Muslims need equal rights and even the most patriotic one will admit there are biases against not just muslims but minorities in Indian occupied parts.
It must anger you to see Kashmiri muslims joining Indian army in greater numbers. They hunt down Pak sponsored terrorists with great ferocity. Then their relatives stand in line and vote in elections, elections that do not happen in Pakistan administered Kashmir which is under direct military rule and appointment. They welcome and host Indian tourists and enjoy their higher than average lifestyle in India....and send their kids to good schools across the country....who then become integrated with India even more.

Indian propaganda over Kashmir is set to rival Israels over Palestine. Most of the forces in Kashmir are from outside the territory. Now you are proud of some mercenaries who abandon the cause of their peoples independence joining in huge numbers. There is no proof that they are joining Indian army in huge numbers but such obfuscation of the ground realities is well known among Indians.
Its good the last vestiges of pro-Pakistan ideology are sending their daughters blindly to Pakistan. We don't want their lineage or spawn here in India....good riddance and may it happen more to accelerate the current trend of mainstream muslims integrating peacefully and patriotically with India.

But most of us have not left our territory. If we go we will take Taj Mehal and Charminar with us. Lucknowis who escaped to newly made boundaries of Pakistan instead of trying to make our land Lucknow or Malwa as it was called in the past part of that Pakistan. This resulted in a moth eaten Pakistan. Though even my direct family moved I am more sympathetic to the 3/5th of our relatives who live in Lucknow or other occupied parts and support Pakistan. They are the real patriots.

The spirit of Maulana Azad, Bacha Khan and many others live on. It gives you a special burn I know.
As I said some traitors aren't going to change the ground facts or the 90%+ muslim vote the Muslim League won in UP in 47. This is why I keep saying to the foolish loyal Indian muslims that we are essentially one people and the moment there is trouble with the Hindus like in Gujarat you will run to Pakistan's current borders. It was this that we had to do. No one expects such a thing to happen. It happens suddenly.
 
I have already acknowledged our countries negative role in Bengal. But even Bengalis understand that Islam was sacrificed due to the dispute which India made full advantage of. As I said treat Kashmiris better then talk about Bengal. India is getting away with Kashmir because it is a much smaller population but oppression there is severe.

You gave me some numbers. I am just interested to know what numbers you believe happened w.r.t Bangladesh/East Pakistan in 1971.

I have never seen any other people so vain as are the Indians of today. A few years back you were in a state of sporadic decline. Its not about money. If you think bribing or telling tales of India's economy will win over us muslims you are wrong. Muslims need equal rights and even the most patriotic one will admit there are biases against not just muslims but minorities in Indian occupied parts.

State of sporadic decline? HAHA. Losing more money in a year than Pakistan has ever made in 5 may be a huge calamity to a Pakistan size economy. We shrug it off, elect a new govt and keep growing at a healthy clip....muslims included.

We don't care what a Pakistani says Muslims in India feel or think....we see and experience the reality every day for ourselves with our Muslim neighbours, friends and colleagues. Thats why a Muslim has made it to the highest office of India (president) a number of times. Can the same be said for non-Muslim in Pakistan? So its funny when you try to compare us with you. We certainly didnt barbarically slaughter hundreds of thousands, if not millions (lets see which number you choose) people in pretty much cold blood in just the span of a few months like Pakistan did in 1971. You see we can wash ourselves of any alleged blood on our hands much quicker....because we are responsible for magnitudes lower number of deaths than Pakistan. We will not stop to listen to your concerns....because they come from a hypocrite basically.

Indian propaganda over Kashmir is set to rival Israels over Palestine. Most of the forces in Kashmir are from outside the territory. Now you are proud of some mercenaries who abandon the cause of their peoples independence joining in huge numbers. There is no proof that they are joining Indian army in huge numbers but such obfuscation of the ground realities is well known among Indians.

I go by the evidence. I remember what the 90s were like regarding Kashmir and what the situation is like now on the ground. I have been there and seen it and talked to the Kashmiris themselves. A person like you can never visit Srinagar directly so you have to rely on whatever is fed to you by PTV and your govt/society which wants to deflect as much attention away from its own failings on almost every issue of real importance (development, education, jobs)

And dont compare with Israel. Israel does not see Palestine territories as an integral part of Israel. They are there to occupy to maintain security and to bargain away the land in any lasting peace settlement. India sees Kashmir as a complete integral part of India, we will not barter any piece of land away from it (like Pakistan did with China) and we will only take back what is not in our hands in the future eventually if Pakistan does not change its attitude by using the huge advantage that is accelerating in our favour now and will continue. Its really that simple.

But most of us have not left our territory. If we go we will take Taj Mehal and Charminar with us. Lucknowis who escaped to newly made boundaries of Pakistan instead of trying to make our land Lucknow or Malwa as it was called in the past part of that Pakistan. This resulted in a moth eaten Pakistan. Though even my direct family moved I am more sympathetic to the 3/5th of our relatives who live in Lucknow or other occupied parts and support Pakistan. They are the real patriots.

You can't take crap with you other than the clothes on your back. Those that dont integrate but want to stay get to keep their ghettoes....and they will be liquidated down the line at some moment if they ever openly espouse separatism or sedition. Its not because they are muslim, this applies to any community. Now if they know how to keep quiet, keep their views to themselves and behind closed doors and just grumble here and there....we dont have a problem. If they send their kids to Pakistan to marry and settle there.....thats great news for India.....its fewer potential problems for India down the road.

Likewise we accept any Hindus from Pakistan that seek sanctuary in India (and there are a good number more of them compared to Muslims leaving to Pak from India). But whats interesting is there is no huge flood of muslims leaving India to Pakistan. Its like when Musharaff got shocked when Delhi Jama Masjid Imam told him to focus on Pakistan and not Indian muslims (when Musharraf asked what Pakistan can do to help them)...that Indian muslims will deal with their problems and dont need Pakistan to help or direct.

Pakistan basically has no sustained credibility with Indian muslims as a whole other than a few fringe elements like your alleged relatives that you keep harping on about. Pakistan violent actions w.r.t Bangladesh in 1971 and its clear hand behind stoking Kashmir blood spilling in 1989 onwards just settles what Pakistan is in Indian muslims mind....a vicious desperado who's creation is a mistake but one that needs appropriate handling over time. Now add to this how Pakistan's relations are with fellow muslim countries like Afghanistan and Iran....and few Indian muslims see a true "ummah" character within Pakistan. I mean look at constant targetting of Shia minority in Pakistan. Its very upsetting/concerning to any Shia in India....and then he/she automatically thanks being in India.

Thats why India's situation w.r.t its muslims is very stable and peaceful overall....and people like you only have Pakistan forums to vent your frustration about it.

As I said some traitors aren't going to change the ground facts or the 90%+ muslim vote the Muslim League won in UP in 47. This is why I keep saying to the foolish loyal Indian muslims that we are essentially one people and the moment there is trouble with the Hindus like in Gujarat you will run to Pakistan's current borders. It was this that we had to do. No one expects such a thing to happen. It happens suddenly.

Good keep saying that to them (foolish loyal Indian muslims) to drive them away further from your kind and take as many middle ground muslims as possible with them (basically make them choose a side).

We want Muslims to get segregated more and more in their ideology so the relevant quarters can be isolated and picked off with ease when we deem it to be necessary. You are doing a good job for us, keep it going.

You are not essentially one people and you never will be, its why loyal Indian muslims even exist in the first place.

Muslims in general know that they should never ignite something like Godhra, Gujarat. If you burn a train down (with women and children in it on top of the people that you were targetting), you are not going to be received with love and compassion by the angry mob that forms. Its pretty simple common sense.

So as long as Muslims stay peaceful and learn to live under a non-Muslim majority...there is not going to be a problem. As soon as they decide they want to give some slap, they will receive 10 thumps in return till they remember the common sense again. Its too bad the slaps and thumps will be generally misdirected and involve many innocents on both sides....but thats the nature of undereducated, underdeveloped societies.....that element will change with time.....but not the common sense part that muslims will have to continue to live by....whatever their personal leanings may be.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom