Majority Pakistanis want legislation to be influenced by Islam, survey reveals

[RAMPAGE]

Wait what does that mean? The time of Rasool Allah (SAW) Muslims and non-Muslims lived together.

I hate to break it to you, love, But Sunni Islam forbids you from living in Dar-ul-Kuffar.

 

[Norwegian]

Sharia is divine, it doesn't require my endorsement, I'm but a mortal. I don't endorse a theocracy but a democratic Islamic state which draws its laws from Islamic jurisprudence. It must uphold our way of life and our value system.

How can you call such a state democractic when it's laws are not made by the demos (people) but divine and heavenly Mullahs?

 

[ACE OF THE AIR]

I am a secularist and doesn't care about qadiani beliefs. It's not Parliaments job to declare faith issues. But I am not surprised as Pakistani parliamentarians also runs the development projects so it should be a special "democracy" found nowhere else in the world

Pakistan's Parliament has been empowered to do such a thing under the Constitution.

All Parliaments are empowered to make what ever law the wish if it is the choice of the people. This is know as Parliamentary Supremacy.

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

Focus being on

a) Education
b) Hospitals
c) Jobs
d) Sports
g) Healthy entertainment/ Water/ Electricity

Thank you

home / mosque is always there for religion (Low priority already lots of places to worship)

Government matter has to be run by solid policy making, security & growth in economy sector

Religion should only take the 30 min time slot per day out of 24 hours

 

[Kompromat]

While the entire beuracracy of the British Empire was packed with Hindus. The deprivation of liberty and livelihood was the main driver between Muslim separatism calling British and Hindus as a double Bluff. Muslim leaders compared it to the two stones of a grinding mill in which Muslims were being royally oppressed.

What ???? Entire freedom struggle was dominated by Congress party spearheaded by likes of Gandhi, Nehru, Patel along their Muslim friends... It was a Hindu "Bose" who oraganized a proper army however ragtag...

Go ask the British themselves about if they think Gandhi, Nehru, Patel, Bose etc were cooperative, ML on the other hand...

@Joe Shearer will you endorse @Horus quoted statement?

 

[RoadRunner401]

yo bro dont say that I will go to jail.

Kind of confuse here, eating Jewish food is against the Law in England.

 

[Moonlight]

Followers of Ali never believed in the concept of Khalifa but Imamat. They are called Shias today but were there all along since first Khalifa.

Your question was Islam was always divided into different sects. ALWAYS! So my example were to tell you. NO! Islam wasnt divided into different sects from the day one.

 

[Norwegian]

Pakistan's Parliament has been empowered to do such a thing under the Constitution.

All Parliaments are empowered to make what ever law the wish if it is the choice of the people. This is know as Parliamentary Supremacy.

The Constitution doesn't empower Parliamentarians to declare who is Muslim and who is not.

 

[Moonlight]

I hate to break it to you, love, But Sunni Islam forbids you from living in Dar-ul-Kuffar.

Provide me the details of this fatwa. Please!

 

[Norwegian]

Your question was Islam was always divided into different sects. ALWAYS! So my example were to tell you. NO! Islam wasnt divided into different sects from the day one.

Sure it was. The first caliph wasn't supported by followers of Ali. They kept revolting until Ali was declared Caliph. And after his assassination completely moved away from Khilafat to form their own system of Imamat.

 

[ACE OF THE AIR]

I thought zakat is tax?(one of the taxes?)

There is a TAX on Non-Muslims. It is there to protect them.

This tax is not levied in Pakistan because Non-Muslims are equal citizens

 

[Spectre]

While the entire beuracracy of the British Empire was packed with Hindus. The deprivation of liberty and livelihood was the main driver between Muslim separatism calling British and Hindus as a double Bluff. Muslim leaders compared it to the two stones of a grinding mill in which Muslims were being royally oppressed.

Bureaucracy and freedom struggle both were characterized by demographic parameters as such you would find a majority of Hindus on both sides of the fence, as for bureaucrats themselves, they were gainfully employed by British that doesn't mean they did not want an Independent India. Are you saying there were no Muslim Bureaucrats or Muslims in British Indian Army?

Kindly look at the first war of independence and find out how it started and who were the major players...

I am not at all saying that Muslims are not to be credited but for heaven's sake don't say Hindus did not want freedom and it was Muslims singlehandly who got us freedom. This reeks of rank and false opportunism.

 

[Norwegian]

There is a TAX on Non-Muslims. It is there to protect them.

This tax is not levied in Pakistan because Non-Muslims are equal citizens

Are Qadianis equal citizens?

I am not at all saying that Muslims are not to be credited but for heaven's sake don't say Hindus did not want freedom and it was Muslims singlehandly who got us freedom. This reeks of rank and false opportunism.

Followers of Pakistan movement were fighting on two fronts:

• Struggle against the British
• Struggle against the Congress

The idea of Pakistan was not to implement sharia but independence from British and Hindu domination. The rest is history

 

[RAMPAGE]

Sharia is divine, it doesn't require my endorsement, I'm but a mortal. I don't endorse a theocracy but a democratic Islamic state which draws its laws from Islamic jurisprudence. It must uphold our way of life and our value system.

Sovereignty belongs to Allah. Will of the people has no place in an Islamic state. So you see, Democracy cannot be Islamic.

Provide me the details of this fatwa. Please!

Which is acceptable? Wahabi or Hanafi? Or would you like a Hadith?

@Zarvan bhai

Care to help out a mominah in distress? @Moonlight No offence intended.

 

[livingdead]

While the entire beuracracy of the British Empire was packed with Hindus. The deprivation of liberty and livelihood was the main driver between Muslim separatism calling British and Hindus as a double Bluff. Muslim leaders compared it to the two stones of a grinding mill in which Muslims were being royally oppressed.

It was mainly hindus who fought for independence, especially since muslim league became main muslim voice(and not congress party). Most of the time muslim league fought for parity with hindus and betterment of subcontinent muslims and not independence as such. The idea that british will leave and upper caste hindus will rule India again was their main fear.

Its also true that more hindus than muslims gained from british education system and furthered their career. Many of them were upper caste hindus who benefited from it.(some muslim reformists did try to bring british style education to muslims but were partially successful) But they were also the ones who understood the idea of nationhood and sovereignty later spearheading the campaign for independence. Muslims were either too poor or too much into fighting for their own rights.
So yes, the rebellious muslims fighting and hindus collaborating with british its a lie.