What's new

Indian diplomat held for counter espionage for Pakistan

Status
Not open for further replies.
One guy made a comment and you start jumping up and down. Should I also generalize by your comment and say that all Pakistanis are generalizing people incapable of a balanced perspective? Think before you type.

When did I say that whole of India is of the same view, I was only referring to a guys post and how he/she was generalizing all indian women based on a couple of incidents. And how is a women who married a Pakistani similar to an Indian women who has been accused of espionage.

You should think before you type, and as evident from the comments on such websites, MANY people hold the same view.

Stupidity at its peak.
 
She is the girl


pic.php

she looks so innocent,,,,, spying for Pakistan is not a sin,,lol:oops::D
 
Ok, put your bets out.

Who do you think seduced her. I vote for Maulana Fazal-ur-Rehman or Choudhary Shujat.

Could be Zardari, Gilani, Imran or anyone else too.

presidency1-3.jpg
 
Ok, put your bets out.

Who do you think seduced her. I vote for Maulana Fazal-ur-Rehman or Choudhary Shujat.

Could be Zardari, Gilani, Imran or anyone else too.

presidency1-3.jpg

Is that her at the table with Zardari and Gillani?
 
When did I say that whole of India is of the same view, I was only referring to a guys post and how he/she was generalizing all indian women based on a couple of incidents. And how is a women who married a Pakistani similar to an Indian women who has been accused of espionage.

You should think before you type, and as evident from the comments on such websites, MANY people hold the same view.

Stupidity at its peak.

Here's what you wrote in your earlier post -

A couple of women do something that Indians in general did not like and all women are being generalized.

You asserted that all women are being generalized by Indians, based on one idiot's comment. And I am not talking about Sania here. I am talking about generalizing all Indian women by Indians. See the difference now? And explain it to your other smart countrymen that replied to my post on Page 3.
 
Why do you all assume that she was apparently passing secrets to Pakistan? Has it been said anywhere that she was working for the Pakistanis? What incentives would she have working for among all other countries, for Pakistanis? Give me one. (Consulate workers get paid handsomely, so Pakistani money is NOT an incentive!)

IMHO, she was apparently working for some foreign intelligence agency, given her status and ranking in the consulate. Money would not be the motivator for working against India, and that too for Pakistan? LMAOROTL!! Maybe a permanent residency visa to a western country in all likelihood would have been the motivator. That narrows the culprits to a few countries.

Picking out Pakistan for recruiting such a mole is an interesting thing to do. Wonder what the agenda might have been?

---------- Post added at 05:27 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:26 AM ----------

In her heart of hearts she probably knew that India was in the wrong on most India-Pakistan issues. :D

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Nice try AM!
 
agreed, but i have one more point in my mind, she was under observation for one year , meaning Indians were double minded about her & they must have used her to feed the wrong info plus may be ISI found that Indians are doubtful about her so they intentionally busted her

Hi EMO

Actually i was expecting Pak member to raise the issue of timing behind this arrest.

It's surprising that MEA actually gave out this arrest information at so early a stage, considering that they suspect more individuals are involved. I had a friend working in minor capacity with a intelligence body. He said, such moles when detected, are kept under surveillance and once apprehended tried to be re-cultivated.

I'm not the typical conspiracy guy..... but something does not seem right here.

Regards.
 
Here's what you wrote in your earlier post -

A couple of women do something that Indians in general did not like and all women are being generalized.

You asserted that all women are being generalized by Indians, based on one idiot's comment. And I am not talking about Sania here. I am talking about generalizing all Indian women by Indians. See the difference now? And explain it to your other smart countrymen that replied to my post on Page 3.

A couple of women do something that Indians in general did not like and all women are being generalized by the commentator.

That is what I meant but you took it in a wrong manner, well its corrected now.

I was in no way attributing to all indians, if I were I would have indicated so.
 
Here's what you wrote in your earlier post -

A couple of women do something that Indians in general did not like and all women are being generalized.

You asserted that all women are being generalized by Indians, based on one idiot's comment. And I am not talking about Sania here. I am talking about generalizing all Indian women by Indians. See the difference now? And explain it to your other smart countrymen that replied to my post on Page 3.

self deleted
 
Money would not be the motivator for working against India, and that too for Pakistan? LMAOROTL!! Maybe a permanent residency visa to a western country in all likelihood would have been the motivator. That narrows the culprits to a few countries.

Picking out Pakistan for recruiting such a mole is an interesting thing to do. Wonder what the agenda might have been?

---------- Post added at 05:27 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:26 AM ----------



:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Nice try AM!

Hey Gubbi

Such moles are typically re-cultivated. I suspect this was not tried here was because they are sure that the mole would possibly not return back if released --- raising the suspicion that she was probably working for some western country

But lets wait and pray she did not leak data to ISI.

Regards.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom