Should the US continue support to Israel?

[Falcon29]

Because the Palestinians continue to attack Israel for all those decades too.

No, because the stated intentions of Israel are to annex what they believe is their land. Resistance to occupation whether peaceful/violent is justified. Peaceful demonstrations never changed anything. Israel has one goal, to humiliate and expel all Palestinians and annex the West Bank and Gaza too if they could(but they can't.).

 

[500]

US support for Israel is purely military and it goes back to US own industries.

Better question to ask should US continue support of the Palestinians? UNRWA which breeds "refugees", corrupted PA? Should US fund the useless UN which only condemns Israel and does nothing productive?

 

[VCheng]

No, because the stated intentions of Israel are to annex what they believe is their land. Resistance to occupation whether peaceful/violent is justified. Peaceful demonstrations never changed anything. Israel has one goal, to humiliate and expel all Palestinians and annex the West Bank and Gaza too if they could(but they can't.).

Incorrect. Israel has its land and only seeks to get its borders accepted as part of an overall two state solution that is still to be negotiated.

 

[Falcon29]

Incorrect. Israel has its land and only seeks to get its borders accepted as part of an overall two state solution that is still to be negotiated.

@Chak Bamu @Fulcrum15 @WebMaster

He's spamming this thread with his rhetoric.

 

[VCheng]

@Chak Bamu @Fulcrum15 @WebMaster

He's spamming this thread with his rhetoric.

It is your views that are incorrect and serve to mislead others. I am only setting the record straight, fairly and squarely.

 

[Falcon29]

It is your views that are incorrect and serve to mislead others. I am only setting the record straight, fairly and squarely.

Sure it is buddy, you're spamming this thread with provocative rhetoric(Intentionally doing so for whatever sick reason, maybe it turns you on or you have a chemical imbalance in your brain) and it better stop.

You absolutely made no contribution to this thread. Stick to the topic.

 

[VCheng]

US support for Israel is purely military and it goes back to US own industries.

Better question to ask should US continue support of the Palestinians? UNRWA which breeds "refugees", corrupted PA? Should US fund the useless UN which only condemns Israel and does nothing productive?

USA has to ensure that a two state solution is implemented as quickly as can be achieved. For that, it must have leverage with both parties, and hence support to both sides is helpful in creating that leverage.

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

No, you stop embarrassing yourself. The blockade/occupation has existed in occuipped territories for decades.

It is even worse, occupation has existed in the occupied territories since the day they were occupied!

 

[Falcon29]

USA has to ensure that a two state solution is implemented as quickly as can be achieved..

US has never been trying to achieve a two state solution. If it wanted, tomorrow we could have one. Israel is entirely dependent upon the US. The US has massive leverage to end Israel's illegal activities. It does nothing. On the contrary it encourages/supports/allows Israel to continue.

 

[VCheng]

US has never been trying to achieve a two state solution. If it wanted, tomorrow we could have one. Israel is entirely dependent upon the US. The US has massive leverage to end Israel's illegal activities. It does nothing.

For the two state solution to actually come about, a basic requirement is for the Palestinians to recognize Israel's right to exist safely and securely within its negotiated borders. Only then can the process be moved forward.

 

[XenoEnsi-14]

H-E-L-L No.

Yes, U.S.A should continue to support for Israel... They have good contribution for humanity, i.e good contribution in chemistry , physics, optics, medicine, economics, biotechnology, theoretical computer science unlike Palestine which is master in developing only tunnels.

So, still can end support.

 

[Falcon29]

For the two state solution to actually come about, a basic requirement is for the Palestinians to recognize Israel's right to exist safely and securely within its negotiated borders. Only then can the process be moved forward.

Again not true, you don't follow anything in this conflict. Palestinians already accept that Israeli exists, it does. They won't recognize an apartheid state as a precondition to selling out the Palestinian cause and the US administration agrees with that.

Kerry: Netanyahu wrong to insist Palestinians recognize Israel as Jewish state

......
The US administration had already planned 1967 borders. Instead, Israel rejected it. And the Israeli PM came in front of the US Congress to denounce Obama. Whilst Congress members were bribed by Jewish Lobbyists.

If Jewish Lobbying prevents Middle East peace then it should be declared an illegal, terrorist entity.

 

[VCheng]

Again not true, you don't follow anything in this conflict. Palestinians already accept that Israeli exists, it does. They won't recognize an apartheid state as a precondition to selling out the Palestinian cause and the US administration agrees with that.

The problem is the Palestinians insistence on having the right to return to inside Israel. That makes the Jews a minority in their own country. This won't fly at all.

 

[Falcon29]

The problem is the Palestinians insistence on having the right to return to inside Israel. That makes the Jews a minority in their own country. This won't fly at all.

The problem is that you don't know anything you're talking about and should shut up. One excuse to another, you're an Israeli apologist. You either come debate with facts/sources or you take a hike.

Don't force your rhetoric down people's throats here. You're on a mission in this thread and have derailed it. I back my statements up with factual data. Stop spamming.

 

[VCheng]

The problem is that you don't know anything you're talking about and should shut up. One excuse to another, you're an Israeli apologist. You either come debate with facts/sources or you take a hike.

Sir, please respond to the content of my posts without resorting to personal attacks. Thank you.