What's new

Kashmiris concerned by plans for Hindu satellite cities

there are reports and on the basis of small reports one cannot undermine it. :)

Do you see something comical in your sentences?

There are reports, and on the basis of small reports, one cannot undermine it? What on earth does that mean?
  1. Are you acknowledging that there are reports which say what you don't want to admit?
  2. Are you saying that these reports are unacceptable to you?
  3. Why, if so, are they unacceptable to you? Because they represent a view of reality which contradicts yours?
  4. Are you completely deranged?
 
Do you see something comical in your sentences?

There are reports, and on the basis of small reports, one cannot undermine it? What on earth does that mean?
  1. Are you acknowledging that there are reports which say what you don't want to admit?
  2. Are you saying that these reports are unacceptable to you?
  3. Why, if so, are they unacceptable to you? Because they represent a view of reality which contradicts yours?
  4. Are you completely deranged?
When Pakistan illegally handover part of kashmir to China. I don't nor does Indian government believe on Pakistan. They can do any thing and can change and changing the Demography. In Gilgit, it has already changed chacha.When they supported demography change in India, it is obvious in Azad Kashmir it is being done.
 
Last edited:
When Pakistan illegally handover part of kashmir to China. I don't nor does Indian government believe on Pakistan. They can do any thing and can change and changing the Demography. In Gilgit, it has already changed chacha.When they supported demography change in India, it is obvious in Azad Kashmir it is being done.

I have refuted your arguments time and again, and you have nothing new to add. Do you think that if you persist, people will agree with your nonsense?
 
I have refuted your arguments time and again, and you have nothing new to add. Do you think that if you persist, people will agree with your nonsense?


1)quote any post where you have refuted my argument with logic.

2)You failed to furnish any article from pakistan constitution which I asked

3)after repeatedly saying that my discusion does not revolve around article 370 but , illegal demographic change in Azad Kashmir. You braught back argument to article 370.

4)Quote any post where you have furnished any proof. or chacha mujhse proof mangta hai.. lol.

5)Even for instance if I have access to government documents , you think I am a fool that I will furnish them here? Well may be you can, right chacha?

6)Why are you interested in advocating Pakistan's innocence when they are not.

7) All of my posts blame Pakistan, but your posts say no I am wrong. Why double standard.


counter this first,

''When Pakistan illegally handover part of kashmir to China. I don't nor does Indian government believe on Pakistan. They can do any thing and can change and changing the Demography. In Gilgit, it has already changed chacha.When they supported demography change in India, it is obvious in Azad Kashmir it is being done.''
 
Last edited:
Our Prophet Muhammad (S.A.W.W) have told many things about, what will come in future and one thing he said that there will be time when muslims blood will spill alot and only one out of 72 sects will be true muslims and jews will be defeated when Prophet Essa (jesus) will come back to earth in Syria when jews had circled muslim army and would have thought that they have won, but after arrival of Phophet Essa he will accept Islam and then muslims will destroy jews.

Sorry for being off topic.

And you guys really believe that absolute piece of horse shit.........and that too in this age!!
 
Yes Bhaiyas pundits should be resetled but how we determine who is real and who is fake? Their population is not more then few thousands. Anyway they can go back after IoK is made part of Pakistan.

In your wet dream.
 
Why would they be ever concerned. Has any of these Kashmir pandits incited violence on anyone ever? It was always the other way around. Hence it should be the pandits themselves who should be a bit concerned.
 
Yesterday I watched a discussion. General Bakshi told that respectively 27 and 32 Kashmiri Pandeets died in effort to rehabilitate them in their old houses. So it is not possible. They must be settled in a highly secure place like proposed township.
 
1)quote any post where you have refuted my argument with logic.

Almost every single one?

2)You failed to furnish any article from pakistan constitution which I asked

You asked for an equivalent of Article 370! And in your next statement, below, you are pleading that you were not talking about that at all.

3)after repeatedly saying that my discusion does not revolve around article 370 but , illegal demographic change in Azad Kashmir. You braught back argument to article 370.

Your own doing. You insisted that you were talking about any article in the Pakistani constitution which was equivalent to Article 370. So that brought the discussion right back to Article 370.

4)Quote any post where you have furnished any proof. or chacha mujhse proof mangta hai.. lol.

Every one, idiot.

5)Even for instance if I have access to government documents , you think I am a fool that I will furnish them here? Well may be you can, right chacha?

How did government documents come into the picture? If you don't have public information that can be used as evidence, you don't have a case.

6)Why are you interested in advocating Pakistan's innocence when they are not.

I am interested in the facts, you are interested only in pretending that there is a case when you have no evidence whatever.

7) All of my posts blame Pakistan, but your posts say no I am wrong. Why double standard.

This shows that your grip on English is weak, and you don't know what a double standard means. It means that you are being judged differently from other people. However, since you are being judged exactly as others would have been judged, there is no question of doubt standards being applied here.


counter this first,

''When Pakistan illegally handover part of kashmir to China. I don't nor does Indian government believe on Pakistan. They can do any thing and can change and changing the Demography. In Gilgit, it has already changed chacha.When they supported demography change in India, it is obvious in Azad Kashmir it is being done.''

This is pure and unadulterated rubbish. Neither you nor the government of India has or had any jurisdiction over the land handed over. It was always a piece of cartographic aggression by the Ministry of External Affairs against the Chinese. No maps existed covering this piece of territory, and maps were hastily made up on Nehru's explicit instructions. Our earliest maps did not include this territory as part of India.

So where is the question of believing Pakistan? It is a question of whether anyone at all can believe India.

Second, neither Pakistan nor China changed demographics in any single way by the recognition of the Shaksgam strip as belonging to China. It was uninhabited land. So how does this have anything to do with demographics?

Thirdly, you have never quoted any proof that there has been demographic change in Gilgit. Your only argument is that if they can support it in Indian administered Kashmir, it is obvious that it is being done in Azad Kashmir. The defect with this is that in Indian administered Kashmir, Hindus, citizens of Kashmir as defined by the Kashmir constitution, were driven out; in Azad Kashmir, there are no Hindus to be driven out, and the people re-settled in Gilgit were Sunni Kashmiris, who have always been recognised as citizens of Kashmir under the Kashmir constitution.

You have no case.

You never had a case.

And stop hinting that those who do not agree with your stupid arguments are acting against India.
 
Yesterday I watched a discussion. General Bakshi told that respectively 27 and 32 Kashmiri Pandeets died in effort to rehabilitate them in their old houses. So it is not possible. They must be settled in a highly secure place like proposed township.

every one is aware except for few, that in Azad Kashmir demography is changed, and in Kashmir they are changing via proxy war.

This is pure and unadulterated rubbish. Neither you nor the government of India has or had any jurisdiction over the land handed over. It was always a piece of cartographic aggression by the Ministry of External Affairs against the Chinese. No maps existed covering this piece of territory, and maps were hastily made up on Nehru's explicit instructions. Our earliest maps did not include this territory as part of India.

So where is the question of believing Pakistan? It is a question of whether anyone at all can believe India.

Second, neither Pakistan nor China changed demographics in any single way by the recognition of the Shaksgam strip as belonging to China. It was uninhabited land. So how does this have anything to do with demographics?

Thirdly, you have never quoted any proof that there has been demographic change in Gilgit. Your only argument is that if they can support it in Indian administered Kashmir, it is obvious that it is being done in Azad Kashmir. The defect with this is that in Indian administered Kashmir, Hindus, citizens of Kashmir as defined by the Kashmir constitution, were driven out; in Azad Kashmir, there are no Hindus to be driven out, and the people re-settled in Gilgit were Sunni Kashmiris, who have always been recognised as citizens of Kashmir under the Kashmir constitution.

You have no case.

You never had a case.

And stop hinting that those who do not agree with your stupid arguments are acting against India.

ask RAW. :) they will give you proof.
 

Back
Top Bottom