2012 - WORLD MILITARY RANKINGS

[DarkPrince]

what a ranking nepal is in the list but not BD


n why is greece no 33

they've got a very strong air force

 

[Serpentine]

Number of these bs rankings is so damn high in this forum
Any country,under specific circumstances can win a more powerful country,quantity doesn't always count
Viet Nam is a good example,so as Afghanistan.

 

[mb444]

Hilarious website...... Probably run by a kid as a school project...

 

[anarchy 99]

India at number 4?

And the countries it imports weapons from are below them. You cant make this sh*t up.

 

[Shinigami]

France at No.8
Israel at No.10
Australia at No.24
Saudi Arabia at No.26

no way.

BS ranking!!

1>Australia below Filipines(These guys don't even have a 4th Gen aircraft unlike Oz)

2> France and Israel below India.Oh!!Please cut the crap.

Nonsense rankings. The first six are definitely UN security council permanent members and Israel.
They have ranked India above France and Israel, whereas India mostly imports all its weapons and the makers are ranked below India.
Unbelievable.

Hilarious website...... Probably run by a kid as a school project...

India at number 4?

And the countries it imports weapons from are below them. You cant make this sh*t up.

u people know nothing about military power or warfare.

why are u here? at least dont make retarded comments.

This website is DEADLY accurate. You can take my word for it, because i am very familiar with these things.

 

[Mercenary]

Global Fire Power is a total joke.

Iran is ranked ahead of Germany.

Is this site for real?

 

[Shinigami]

what strikes me strange is that indians are blissfully unaware how powerful their military is. just because you dont go around threatening your neighbours, does not mean you are weak.

 

[Mercenary]

what strikes me strange is that indians are blissfully unaware how powerful their military is. just because you dont go around threatening your neighbours, does not mean you are weak.

Indian military is large and bloated.

India lost 700 men when they deployed forces along the Pakistani border in 2002.

Its a large moving elephant, while Pakistan is nimble as ants.

The elephant can kill hundreds, perhaps thousands of ants, but soon the ants will overpower that elephant and the elephant will be eaten to the bone.

 

[Shinigami]

Indian military is large and bloated.

India lost 700 men when they deployed forces along the Pakistani border in 2002.

Its a large moving elephant, while Pakistan is nimble as ants.

The elephant can kill hundreds, perhaps thousands of ants, but soon the ants will overpower that elephant and the elephant will be eaten to the bone.

pakistan lost a lot more in the stand off. i am guessing thats why your numbers were'nt released.

about your claim of Indian military is large and bloated,

The Sunday Times of London, which had reporters on all the fronts, wrote on 12 December1971 says, "It took only 12 days for the Indian Army to smash its way to Dacca, an achievement reminiscent of the German Blitzkrieg across France in 1940. The strategy was the same: speed, ferocity and flexibility."

 

[Vinod2070]

Pakistan is more of a nuisance for India.

PA's main (and real) adversaries are all inside.

All glorious victories have also been very much within. The 111 brigade, jumping a few fences and a glorious victory secured.

They will dare not fight India and we are not interested.

 

[Mercenary]

pakistan lost a lot more in the stand off. i am guessing thats why your numbers were'nt released.

about your claim of Indian military is large and bloated,

The Sunday Times of London, which had reporters on all the fronts, wrote on 12 December1971 says, "It took only 12 days for the Indian Army to smash its way to Dacca, an achievement reminiscent of the German Blitzkrieg across France in 1940. The strategy was the same: speed, ferocity and flexibility."

We didn't

India lost 700 men while Pakistan hardly lost any.

pakistan lost a lot more in the stand off. i am guessing thats why your numbers were'nt released.

about your claim of Indian military is large and bloated,

The Sunday Times of London, which had reporters on all the fronts, wrote on 12 December1971 says, "It took only 12 days for the Indian Army to smash its way to Dacca, an achievement reminiscent of the German Blitzkrieg across France in 1940. The strategy was the same: speed, ferocity and flexibility."

The fact that our army was isolated and surrounded by all sides.

Why don't you boast about Goa too and how you did a blitzkreig on Portugal.

And when you fought as equals, you got destroyed such as 1962 clash with China when India was totally and utterly defeated.

 

[harpoon]

We didn't

India lost 700 men while Pakistan hardly lost any.

There is no clear statistics bcs of the secretive nature of PA. The world don't even know how much PA men was lost in Kargil.

 

[Battle of Bach Dang River]

A bit of a surprise Taiwan ranks 14th and my country, Singapore, ranks 41st. Where's the all powerful Vietnam? According to the Dai Viet boys here, they can wipe Taiwan and Singapore off the map and subjugate the Chinese Hoas.

Seriously Nepal is stronger than Dai Viet. Oh wait, Philippines at 23rd? I don't believe it, a country that defeated the US of A is not ranked? Must be my eyes, can someone prove me wrong, please.

If GFP extended into a top 100, then hopefully you can see the rank of Vietnam.

If you cannot read any statement by the government or the military in Vietnam or at least from officials of Vietnam, then please dont conclude "they can wipe Taiwan and Singapore off the map and subjugate the Chinese Hoas". That is not the Vietnamese government's ideas and expectations of most Vietnamese.

Dont make others misunderstand that Singapore and Taiwan depend on the protection of Uncle Sam is because the threats from Vietnam.

Vietnam has never been stronger than China, but as you can see, we defeated them many times in the past to defend our country every times they had wanted to annex VN.

And an interesting thing, before the French invaded Vietnam in 1858, they had conducted a research Vietnam and concluded that "the Vietnamese dont know how to use guns, except some ethnic minority people in mountain areas". However, in 1858 coalition French-Spanish began opening fire attack Da Nang, they had to take 25 years to be able to invade entire Vietnam, but in the end we still won the French. Vietnamese army in 1954 with rudimentary equipment, but with special tactics, defeated the French at Dien Bien Phu, captured more than 11 thousand French soldiers, who were equipped to teeth and backed by the US...

 

[Holmes]

u people know nothing about military power or warfare.

why are u here? at least dont make retarded comments.

This website is DEADLY accurate. You can take my word for it, because i am very familiar with these things.

correkt. But militiary isnt everything. man power is even deadlier.. you'll soon see..
Where are the ICBM's?.. Rise..

 

[Vinod2070]

There is no clear statistics bcs of the secretive nature of PA. The world don't even know how much PA men was lost in Kargil.

Although the democraticaly elected PM of the time did clarify that.

He mentioned a figure of 4000 killed, perhaps a bit conservatively.