What's new

India seeks talks with Pak army, ISI chief

Sri Lanka Military & Pakistan Military maintains good relations; I think Stable military relations with India & Pakistan will good for stability of South Asia

20110120_DS4.jpg
I dont think so.

Sri lanka is no where in picture.

Infact Pakistan signed a agreement with India named simla agreement which clearly says that no third party invovlement( not even UNSC,.............I know evil bharatis)
 
We will talk real ppl who are in power for decades in Pakistan now..

You yet to understand that who has power in your country?

so you are going to start talking with CIA or Pentagon too in America?

I think India wants to discuss something that really matters to them right now and is of great importance to them...and it wants to confidence of PAKistan Army that it wont do anything against them !!
 
one thing I never got to understand......................why Indian govt. is so much dieing for talks.....................what Pakistan has to offer to us??

O pyaray.. naraz bachay ki tara na bolnay say kya milay ga tumhien?:lol:
 
Pak-Ind should go ahead from Mumbai & Samjhota issues because both countries must not let these issues as negotiation stopper, we have issues more important like Kashmir, Siachen & Sir creek.

Blaming each other will give nothing but more untruthfulness in relations. Libyan example is enough for both countries to solve their problems without any third participants.

Both country's population need a stable regional environment as positive negotiations will effect not only military but on many other fields of cross relations.

Kashmir.........we not intrested.............its our
sir creek............we control it..............end of case
saichen..............we are height............end of discussion.

whats left
 
one thing I never got to understand......................why Indian govt. is so much dieing for talks.....................what Pakistan has to offer to us??

Not much. But peace is an inviting prospect isn't it? As unlikely as it seems.
 
Kashmir.........we not intrested.............its our
sir creek............we control it..............end of case
saichen..............we are height............end of discussion.

whats left

We only encourage open minded and non radical diplomatic counterparts, so your opinion will stay with you but this is not opinion of your government. You government itself has declared that they ready to discuss over all due issues with Pakistan, it means There is not END OF DISCUSSION.
 
look who is talking. We tried with bus service and we got kargil. We tried agin but we got mumbai...let me know what we are to gain if you are not involved anywhere? Lol

Bus service was mutual decision and bharat alone has nothing to do with that .

as far as your support for movements in india goes what the hell ex pigLeT chief doing in pakistan. Why is kasab a pakistani citizen. Why is to your leaders accept that they hav used terrosm as state policy in the past

:) we are talking about Insurgencies in INDIA which dates back to 70s and beyond all home grown so give us proofs for two dozen insurgencies in India and our involvement


2. You should make your own bharati officials responsible for releasing azhar and many more thats not our headache

3. India is sheltering BLA terrorists so bharatis have no right to even speak about terrorism neither cry over
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom