What's new

China-Pak in MoU to develop stealth variant of JF-17 Thunder

Status
Not open for further replies.
just one thing who is not doing JV

JSF-35
euro fighter

and in future there will be more examples

it better to do JV

as product will be in air in years

like JF-17

instead trying to work alone and make product in decades like

LCA

When Indian programs succeed they are no longer Indian effort to build alone but a foreign program. When the project is delayed, it is an Indian project.

Good ... I am slowly understanding the Pak mindset.
:cheers:
 
We won't be developing a 4th gen project again, it'll be a 5th gen and it's called MCA.
The reason why we can do that is because:
We have composite tech. we've worked on engine tech, we've got radar tech, almost all of it through LCA program.

Now if your problem is that JF 17 is likely to enter turkish armed forces, then you've gotta analyze it from your requirements perspective.

So your saying that the LCA was a testing bed for foreign tech so you can develop your own (Isn't the LCA your fighter ?) Its been almost a decade since the aircraft flew and your still having large amounts of foreign input on it. Now your saying your going to be able to build a 5th gen aircraft ? What will that take a 2 to 3 more decades of foreign input ? Another sinkhole ? :rofl:

I have no problem with anything entering our Air Force we are already set with our F-35/F-16s/Possible Eurofighter and if the JF-17 needs induction that can be added too. It is just that you seem to be under the impression that a JF-17 can not be made stealthy. Though now your maintaining that it can just not F-35/F-22 stealth which is a no brainer.
 
God, seems like Indians cannot live without dissing Pakistan
 
Rafale and EFT never claimed to be stealth aircraft. They only claim HS

take EFT for example
0000012927f685fab40b574b007f000000000001.eurofighter&


This claim of stealth for the Jf-17 is false.



So no limitations here :what: ,

Let alone the R&D limitations of never having made or tested any 5th gen tech other than an AESA radar.

On top of this they have to build on the limitations of the JF-17's original design. As well as the fact that it is a light weight , single
engine aircraft with very little room for internal Changes.

Single engine also means harder to justify any increase in weight.


:taz::taz:

:bunny:

You completely missed the point. Obviously they are not Stealth aircraft in the sense of the F-22(All Aspect) and such. You need to understand though to keep competitive RCS reduction was taken to give them(EFT Rafale) that extra edge. This is what is to be done with the JF-17. No one here is saying it is now going to be turned into a F-22.

Yeah sure there are limitations but you see Pakistan and China will be working on it. Unlike India which is trying to figure out the tech through foreign suppliers. Last time i checked your still running the EL/M-2032 radar in the Tejas and that is a 100% Israeli Radar. Now they are trying to get a AESA in it to keep up with the times with bids coming from ELTA. Projects have to be completed on a certain time frame or you will always end up having to upgrade an aging initial avionic package and performance characteristics .
 
So your saying that the LCA was a testing bed for foreign tech so you can develop your own (Isn't the LCA your fighter ?) Its been almost a decade since the aircraft flew and your still having large amounts of foreign input on it. Now your saying your going to be able to build a 5th gen aircraft ? What will that take a 2 to 3 more decades of foreign input ? Another sinkhole ? :rofl:

I have no problem with anything entering our Air Force we are already set with our F-35/F-16s/Possible Eurofighter and if the JF-17 needs induction that can be added too. It is just that you seem to be under the impression that a JF-17 can not be made stealthy. Though now your maintaining that it can just not F-35/F-22 stealth which is a no brainer.

killed it :rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
When Indian programs succeed they are no longer Indian effort to build alone but a foreign program. When the project is delayed, it is an Indian project.

Good ... I am slowly understanding the Pak mindset.
:cheers:

:no::no::no: when an Indian indigenous project succeeds, it is acknowledged....I wonder how would you derive your conclusion....Pakistan has opted mostly for joint projects as you may not have all the knowledge about a thing you are going to develop (no one acknowledges JFT as indigenous -at least most of the responsible posters- its not always about the pride of producing every thing in house. PAF knows its limitations....so if China is helping Pakistan to walk on its feet in aviation industry we will take it. The same is Nuke deal, we need it and we'll try to take it (no matter how some Indian posters were posting NSG, and so called "ethical" stuff I remember you as well and I still remember an extremely substandard post from u about insulting Pakistan) anyways...India has both the indigenous and foreign programs...and experience shows that foreign programs have been completed on schedule...MKI....Brahmos....and others....but I would appreciate If you guys do not mix indiginous programs with foreign ones...
btw I don't want a reply (as whenever I see your avatar:angry:)
 
Last edited:
Atleast we have guts to say we made JF 17 with China, it was a joint venture, Indians on the other say LCA is entirely there own while its inputs are all foreign made

If LCA was entirely your own then I bet it wud have taken atleast another decade:lol:
 
Atleast we have guts to say we made JF 17 with China, it was a joint venture, Indians on the other say LCA is entirely there own while its inputs are all foreign made

If LCA was entirely your own then I bet it wud have taken atleast another decade:lol:

Another decade. Without foreign effort they would still be trying to draw it's design with a pencil and eraser. :lol:
 
So your saying that the LCA was a testing bed for foreign tech so you can develop your own (Isn't the LCA your fighter ?) Its been almost a decade since the aircraft flew and your still having large amounts of foreign input on it. Now your saying your going to be able to build a 5th gen aircraft ? What will that take a 2 to 3 more decades of foreign input ? Another sinkhole ? :rofl:

I have no problem with anything entering our Air Force we are already set with our F-35/F-16s/Possible Eurofighter and if the JF-17 needs induction that can be added too. It is just that you seem to be under the impression that a JF-17 can not be made stealthy. Though now your maintaining that it can just not F-35/F-22 stealth which is a no brainer.
There isn't anything in that list of fighters that isn't already been offered to us, be it JSF or Euro. F 16? We probably won't even bother to induct it. Our 'Sinkholes' are worldclass laboratories and R&D facilities which synergestically use all these technologies- the same tech used for LCA is also used for our space rockets (sorry forgot you don't have any of those) and Helicopters & the enormous talent pool we've built. Last time I checked boeing & LM were setting up their facilities in India and hiring out hundreds of engineers out here and NOT at your end.
 
There isn't anything in that list of fighters that isn't already been offered to us, be it JSF or Euro. F 16? We probably won't even bother to induct it. Our 'Sinkholes' are worldclass laboratories and R&D facilities which synergestically use all these technologies- the same tech used for LCA is also used for our space rockets (sorry forgot you don't have any of those) and Helicopters & the enormous talent pool we've built. Last time I checked boeing & LM were setting up their facilities in India and hiring out hundreds of engineers out here and NOT at your end.

Buddy we make parts for the F-35,A400M,Eurocopter Group,etc and build F-16s, we have also been offered a multibillion dollar contract to build EFTs in Turkey. And we use your LCA's state of the art Israeli made radar in our F-4 Terminators. :rofl:
 
Turning into a Jf-17 vs LCA thread.. hmm.. usual..
Ramu..the Indian mindset isnt entirely different either, we still moderate.. show me ten Indian posters who show moderate behavior, At max I can count 6 or 7.
 
There isn't anything in that list of fighters that isn't already been offered to us, be it JSF or Euro. F 16? We probably won't even bother to induct it. Our 'Sinkholes' are worldclass laboratories and R&D facilities which synergestically use all these technologies- the same tech used for LCA is also used for our space rockets (sorry forgot you don't have any of those) and Helicopters & the enormous talent pool we've built. Last time I checked boeing & LM were setting up their facilities in India and hiring out hundreds of engineers out here and NOT at your end.

No More

no_bullshit.jpg
 
Buddy, look at the history and you will get your answer just why Pakistan avoided the Indian route of reinventing the wheel. We went the smarter way of JV instead of lifting a massive burden of entire manufacturing process in house without having appropriate R&D and necessary resources. The fact is that JFT IS in service because of this strategy today and LCA is NOT. Until it arrives in IAF colors, lets not go into repeatedly discussed details plz..................
We haven't spent time reinventing anything. We experimented with new materials and mastered the tech (which you haven't done yet), created our own engines that performs to orginal specs though not to the new specs (the same as above), our own radar which right now has most components made in India and uses an Israeli processor. We spent time building AESA tech (which gives us our Awacs), we visited our windtunnels well over 7000 times to learn how to make a combat plane fly. We set up a whole new test facility for flight testing. We feel an acute need now to set up a high altitude test facility (And I hope we build that one too).
That's how REAL tech base is built. Plus, if there is a war, we will be far less vulnerable to spares and servicing problems if critical elements are in house. Plus we create JOBS, we used the LCA tech to build rockets, missiles and even prostheics for medical uses. We sold the CAD/ CAM software to infosys so that they can market it to the international industry. the kaveri will also be used in war ships (look at the money we save), didn't have a problem designing UAV engines coz of the experience.

Anyway i didn't derail the thread, i was bringing out some home truths about the JF 17 which Jigs hijacked. He's responsible for this mess.
 
Sure i am the culprit for trying to make you understand that a JF-17 can be stealthy. Arrest me mods. :bounce:
 
Buddy we make parts for the F-35,A400M,Eurocopter Group,etc and build F-16s, we have also been offered a multibillion dollar contract to build EFTs in Turkey. And we use your LCA's state of the art Israeli made radar in our F-4 Terminators. :rofl:
And you think making some parts is gonna make you equal our Industrial technological strength. Good luck for that.
P.S- Between the two of us, there is only one country that can think of a fifth gen project, and that ain't you
(Like I said, he's the one doing the hijacking, I'm ok sticking with 'stealth JF 17)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom