What's new

Zumwalt-Class Destroyer vs. Kirov-class Battlecruiser Vs. Type 055

zon95

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jul 13, 2011
Messages
224
Reaction score
0
The recent decline in relations between Russia and the West has put ship-vs.-ship warfare back on the table. After more than a decade of supporting land wars in the Middle East and Central Asia, the U.S. Navy is reinvesting in the core mission of sinking ships. The U.S. Navy is expanding this capability but at the same time introducing a new class of ship, the guided missile destroyer USS Zumwalt, designed primarily to support land warfare.

Meanwhile in Russia, Moscow is still trying to squeeze life out of its Kirov-class battlecruisers. The gigantic surface ships, all nearly thirty years old, have aging but still generally effective armament, and are still capable of carrying out their primary mission: attacking very large enemy ships, especially aircraft carriers.

SHIP_DDG-1000_2_Ships_Firing_Concept_lg.jpg


What if the two ships met in combat, one-on-one?

The Zumwalt-class is the latest class of U.S. Navy guided missile destroyer. The three ships: Admiral Elmo Zumwalt, Michael Mansoor and Lyndon B. Johnson, are optimized for naval gunfire support. The ships are the first true “stealth” ships in Navy service, with flattened, angular features designed to reduce their radar signatures.

The Zumwalts will displace fourteen thousand tons, making them the largest U.S. Navy destroyers ever. Their size and weight is largely a function of the ship’s stealthiness, which requires virtually everything to be hidden underneath a radar-defeating exterior. The 610-foot-long Zumwalt allegedly has a radar signature equivalent to a small fishing vessel, and a maximum speed of thirty knots.

Another contributing factor to the weight is the suite of weapons and sensors. The AN/SPY-3 Multi-Function Radar offers superior medium-to-high altitude search performance over previous radars, and can direct Standard SM-2 surface-to-air missiles. The Zumwalt class has eighty vertical launch silos for launching SM-2 and Evolved Sea Sparrow Missiles, Tomahawk land attack missiles and ASROC anti-submarine rockets.

Although Zumwalt may not be capable of area air defense (although there was initially some question, it appears it will indeed be equipped with the SM-2) it will be more than capable of defending itself. The Navy placed an order for eighteen SM-2AUR missiles, likely for the first ship of the class. It can also fit four shorter range Evolved Sea Sparrow Missiles in every missile silo, giving it a theoretical maximum loadout of 320 ESSM.

Given the atrophying of the Navy’s anti-surface capability and the land wars of the early twenty-first century, it’s no surprise Zumwalt is deficient in is the anti-ship mission. There no Harpoon missiles on the stealth destroyers, which do not fit in missile silos and must be accommodated on angled tube launchers, typically located on the main deck.

The ship’s two 155-millimeter Advanced Gun Systems, which have a range of up to eighty-three miles and a rate of fire of ten rounds per minute, have an anti-surface capability and would do tremendous damage against lightly armored surface ships of today.

Zumwalt’s opponent, the battlecruiser Kirov, is a relic from another era. Constructed in the late 1980s to quickly neutralize American aircraft carriers, the ships are designed for an offensive mission. At the same time, they have formidable anti-air capabilities.

The Kirovs were the largest non-aircraft carrier warships built by any postwar navy. Each was 826 feet long—nearly as long as the World War II battleships Bismarck and Iowa—but weighed just 24,000 tons. This was in large part due to their use of nuclear power for propulsion instead of boilers and turbines, giving Kirov and her sisters a top speed of up to thirty-two knots.

Another reason: Kirov traded heavy guns (the nine 16-inch guns of the battleship Iowa together weighed 1,075 tons, not including turret, armor, and ammunition) for missiles. For offensive armament, Kirov has twenty gigantic P-700 Granit antiship missiles. Each Granit is approximately thirty-three feet long and weighs more than fifteen thousand pounds, making them practically unmanned airplanes.

Granit had a range of 300 miles at Mach 2.5 and a 1,653 pound warhead. Initial targeting information could be provided by another platform, such as the Kirov itself, the Kirov’s helicopter, or land-based patrol aircraft such as the Tu-95 Bear. It could even be provided by the Legenda satellite targeting system, which was specifically established to feed target data to the Kirov and Granit combination.

Kirovs were also designed with air defense protection in mind, each armed with a generous arsenal of defensive missiles to keep her alive—at least until her Granits were expended. Ninety six S-300F long-range surface to air missiles formed an outer air defense, 192 3K95 and forty 4K33 short-range surface to air missiles created a layer inside that, and as a last resort, the ships had six AK-630 close-in weapon systems equipped with thirty-millimeter gatling guns.

In a battle between the two ships, which would prevail? Let’s assume place the two ships on the high seas at the maximum range of either side’s antiship weapons: 300 miles, the range of Kirov’s Granit missiles. Unlike previous scenarios, we’ll not assume that each ship knows where the other is, but that eventually, one will find the other. Kirov has the Legenda satellite system working for it, but Legenda is a radar satellite, and Zumwalt is a stealthy destroyer with the radar signature of a small fishing boat.

Both ships are furiously searching for the other, embarked helicopters scanning the ocean beyond the horizon. In this situation the stealth destroyer has the distinct advantage over the majestic, but non-stealthy battlecruiser. Zumwalt’s helicopters detect Kirov first, sending positional data back to their mothership. Kirov detects the helicopters but is unaware of Zumwalt’s actual location.

If Zumwalt’s stealth can hold, theoretically it can close to within gun range of the Kirov. The Russian battlecruiser, on the other hand, will want to hang back and strike Zumwalt from a distance. Unfortunately for the Russian side, everything about Kirov’s systems, from its satellite targeting to the guidance systems of its Granit missiles are radar-guided. Kirov could launch her missiles in a direction she suspects Zumwalt is at, the active homing radars of the Granits would still have to be able to pick up the American destroyer’s tiny radar signature.

Even if the Granits could lock onto Zumwalt, the latter has the air defenses to deal with it. Equipped with at least eighteen SM-2 medium range air defense missiles and several dozen Evolved Sea Sparrow short range air defense missiles, Zumwalt could probably knock down most of the Granits.

95ab251647e9002c5935d7d9a0b057e9.jpg


Can Zumwalt engage with its guns? It depends. At their maximum eighty-three mile range, a Long-Range Land Attack Projectile fired by the Advanced Gun System would take 161.89 seconds to reach the target. Even if Zumwalt knew precisely where Kirov was, the shells would be traveling much too slow to hit the moving battlecruiser. The GPS guidance of the AGS wouldn’t help much either, unless Zumwalt were able to observe Kirov moving at steady speed and bearing, and adding a little Kentucky windage. That might be good for the first barrage, but once Kirov started zig-zagging it would be impossible to get a bead on her.

The end result of this scenario: it’s a tie. Neither side can accurately target the other. In the future new weapons such as the Long Range Anti-Ship Missile would give the Zumwalt a real edge. Alternately, a 155-millimeter projectile capable of receiving terminal guidance from an unmanned aerial vehicle would be useful.

Zumwalt, unable to get close enough to target with guns and Kirov, unable to use its radar-guided weapons, both break off to fight another day.

http://nationalinterest.org/feature/...s-17191?page=2

That's a thought. But according to me

Kirov is being upgraded with

80 VLS S-400 (Range 400km) 3M22 Zircon (600km Range, Mach 6) Kalibr (anti-sub/ship/surface)

http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/rus...-an-1763392754

Zumwalt is not equipped with missiles (anti-air or anti-ship/surface) until the present time

http://www.popularmechanics.com/mili...too-expensive/

For The Type 055. It will also be strong if completed

On Oct. 15, 2016 in Baltimore on the U.S. East Coast, the U.S. Navy commissioned the guided-missile destroyer USS Zumwalt into service following a protracted and costly development.

Six hundred feet long and displacing 14,500 tons, Zumwalt — the first of three stealthy land-attack destroyers — is America’s largest surface combatant in generations.

But she’s not alone in her weight class. While the Americans were celebrating Zumwalt’s entry into service, on the other side of the world at a shipyard in Shanghai, the Chinese navy was hard at work on its own 14,000-ton-displacement surface warship.

The Type 055 just began major construction and probably won’t enter service before 2018. But when she does, she could be the biggest and most powerful surface warship in Asia.

It’s unclear exactly what the Type 055 will do, but indications are that she’ll function as the main air-defense escort for China’s new domestically-built aircraft carrier, currently under construction at Dalian in northern China.

Consider the Type 055’s superstructure facets, apparently meant to support radar emitters similar to the SPY-1 emitters that are part of the U.S. Navy’s Aegis air-defense system. U.S. Navy flattops never go anywhere without at least one Aegis-equipped cruiser and several Aegis destroyers as escorts. Zumwalt, notably, is the first new major American surface combatant class in 30 years not to have Aegis.

The Type 055 likely won’t be a direct competitor of Zumwalt. Rather than integrating Zumwalt and her two sisters into carrier battle groups, the U.S. Navy will probably deploy the giant destroyers on solo cruises near land in order to take advantage of the vessels’ radar-evading hull-form and their twin, 155-millimeter guns, which can fire projectiles a distance of at least 80 miles in order to support amphibious landings and special operations.

The Type 055 just began major construction and probably won’t enter service before 2018. But when she does, she could be the biggest and most powerful surface warship in Asia.

It’s unclear exactly what the Type 055 will do, but indications are that she’ll function as the main air-defense escort for China’s new domestically-built aircraft carrier, currently under construction at Dalian in northern China.

Consider the Type 055’s superstructure facets, apparently meant to support radar emitters similar to the SPY-1 emitters that are part of the U.S. Navy’s Aegis air-defense system. U.S. Navy flattops never go anywhere without at least one Aegis-equipped cruiser and several Aegis destroyers as escorts. Zumwalt, notably, is the first new major American surface combatant class in 30 years not to have Aegis.

The Type 055 likely won’t be a direct competitor of Zumwalt. Rather than integrating Zumwalt and her two sisters into carrier battle groups, the U.S. Navy will probably deploy the giant destroyers on solo cruises near land in order to take advantage of the vessels’ radar-evading hull-form and their twin, 155-millimeter guns, which can fire projectiles a distance of at least 80 miles in order to support amphibious landings and special operations.

The Type 055 just began major construction and probably won’t enter service before 2018. But when she does, she could be the biggest and most powerful surface warship in Asia.

It’s unclear exactly what the Type 055 will do, but indications are that she’ll function as the main air-defense escort for China’s new domestically-built aircraft carrier, currently under construction at Dalian in northern China.

800-417.jpeg


Consider the Type 055’s superstructure facets, apparently meant to support radar emitters similar to the SPY-1 emitters that are part of the U.S. Navy’s Aegis air-defense system. U.S. Navy flattops never go anywhere without at least one Aegis-equipped cruiser and several Aegis destroyers as escorts. Zumwalt, notably, is the first new major American surface combatant class in 30 years not to have Aegis.

The Type 055 likely won’t be a direct competitor of Zumwalt. Rather than integrating Zumwalt and her two sisters into carrier battle groups, the U.S. Navy will probably deploy the giant destroyers on solo cruises near land in order to take advantage of the vessels’ radar-evading hull-form and their twin, 155-millimeter guns, which can fire projectiles a distance of at least 80 miles in order to support amphibious landings and special operations.

http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the...-zumwalt-18248

Armament:

128 VLS Surface-to-air missiles HHQ9 Land attack cruise missiles DH10 Anti-ship cruise missiles YJ18 Anti-submarine missiles
 
Last edited:
The Type 055 is neutralizing armed strength and relatively good RCS reduction, however the quality of radar, sensors China is a big question mark (Their radar exports to Ecuador did not really work, C705 anti-ship missiles can not shoot in the Indonesia naval exercises), quality of Chinese weapons in general need to be considered carefully. Kirov upgrade has too much firepower (more than 300 new missiles), but its drawback is revealing large RCS. Zumwalt only unique advantages is stealth, combat gear too weak. Stealth is not all, it is not invisible

Long-range strike capability anti-ship, beyond the horizon

Kirov: P700/3M22 Zircon
Type 055: YJ-12/18
Zumwalt: no (maybe in the futre it can carry: LRASM)

Winner: Kirov (3M22 Zircon max speed Mach 6, max range 400km)

Land-attack capability:

Kirov: Klub
Type 055: DH-10
Zumwalt: no (maybe in the futre it can carry: TLAM Block IV)

Winner Type 055 (DH-10 max range 4000km)

Air defense capability: Type 055

Kirov: S-300F/400F
Type 055: HHQ9A/HHQ9B
Zumwalt: no (maybe in the futre it can carry: SM-2MR/ER/6/3)

Winner: Kirov (S400 can max range 400km)

Low RCS

Zumwalt - Type 055 - Kirov

Winner: Zumwalt (It's RCS by a fishing boat)

Speed

Kirov: 32 kt
Type 055: 30kt
Zumwalt: 30kt

Winner: Kirov
 
I would still go for Arliegh Burke which is perfect combination of anti air,anti surface warfare in a singles ship
 
remove both 155mm guns, and replace them with 80 more missile cells for 160 cells in total.

the shit can fire the SM-2/SM-3, and I would assume SM-6 with software upgrades.

it's reduced radar section would outclass Kirov easily and it's got enough missiles to shoot down all the Kirov anti ship missiles.

Type-055 would be a harder foe, but 1vs1 Zumwalt would win.
 
remove both 155mm guns, and replace them with 80 more missile cells for 160 cells in total.

the shit can fire the SM-2/SM-3, and I would assume SM-6 with software upgrades.

it's reduced radar section would outclass Kirov easily and it's got enough missiles to shoot down all the Kirov anti ship missiles.

Type-055 would be a harder foe, but 1vs1 Zumwalt would win.

but you are not sure SM-2/6 can shooting down all Zircon Ashm 100%, no test shoot down missiles flying mach 5 of American had made. RCS carriers around 50,000m2, the Kirov is smaller I guess it will reach 10.000-20.000m2. With the removal of the missile launch tubes diagonally and add VLS, it will be strongly reduced RCS

In fact the Zumwalt FCR would be difficult to search for Type 055. 055 there is the danger by AESA. Zumwalt is not equipped the RWR to detect signal of AESA radar scanning

SPY-3 radar only 320km max range. It is not enough to detect distant Kirov, 055 while the Kirov or 055 can be equipped with radar OTH & ka-31. Let see their anti-ship missiles: YJ-18/12 range >400km and 3M22 >400km (some sorce say 1000km). Zumwalt is not equipped with radar OTH & weapons to against targets beyond the horizon beneath the surface (warship).

E-2D is the only means to detect targets beyond the horizon of the US Navy, MH/SH-60 is not capable of this. 055 is the Mineral radar (China version) and Kirov is with Ka-31 + Top Dome/ Tomb Stone radar
 
Last edited:
but you are not sure SM-2/6 can shooting down all Zircon Ashm 100%, no test shoot down missiles flying mach 5 of American had made. RCS carriers around 50,000m2, the Kirov is smaller I guess it will reach 10.000-20.000m2. With the removal of the missile launch tubes diagonally and add VLS, it will be strongly reduced RCS

In fact the Zumwalt FCR would be difficult to search for Type 055. 055 there is the danger by AESA. Zumwalt is not equipped the RWR to detect signal of AESA radar scanning

SPY-3 radar only 320km max range. It is not enough to detect distant Kirov, 055 while the Kirov or 055 can be equipped with radar OTH & ka-31. Let see their anti-ship missiles: YJ-18/12 range >400km and 3M22 >400km (some sorce say 1000km). Zumwalt is not equipped with radar OTH & weapons to against targets beyond the horizon beneath the surface (warship).

E-2D is the only means to detect targets beyond the horizon of the US Navy, MH/SH-60 is not capable of this. 055 is the Mineral radar (China version) and Kirov is with Ka-31 + Top Dome/ Tomb Stone radar


Zircom isn't in service, and probably won't be for another decade. no matter what Zumwalt RCS is several exponentials smaller than the Kirov.


as for radar and weapons I would say Kirov and 055 are better than the Zumwalt.
 
Zircom isn't in service, and probably won't be for another decade. no matter what Zumwalt RCS is several exponentials smaller than the Kirov.


as for radar and weapons I would say Kirov and 055 are better than the Zumwalt.
SM-2/3/6 is not equipped for Zumwalt. Zumwalt RCS small fishing boat, but that ad parameters by the US Navy, the F-117 had been advertising undefeated and still downed

Radar Tech: 055, Zumwalt (AESA)
Max Radar Range: Kirov
Low RCS: Zumwalt
Bring many armed: Kirov
 
Another factor, which is the strength of the vessel armors

Kirov was designed with the concept of the 1980s, at that time had enormous warships and suffered a lot of damage (Kirov, Iowa). Type 055 and DDG-1000 to reduce the RCS concept in the 21st century, so they are designed with a slim hull, composite materials are used a lot. And absolutely no armor against big bullets even fragmentation....it's just less of armors the WW2 battleship

What is this vessel name?

95ab251647e9002c5935d7d9a0b057e9.jpg
model 3D of Kirov upgrade at 2022
 

Back
Top Bottom