What's new

Zero tolerance policy towards female harassment and misogyny.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Arey bhai how to know who is a women, psuedo names are prevalent.

Thanx for info upon two women moderators which were unknown to me. I have so far not seen any woman name here.

Are there?
 
.
LoL how very "feminist" of admin....Why not enforce these rules for everyone irrespective of gender? So swearing at females isnt allowed but at males is? Seems like a meaningless effort for point scoring, these rules are already there, lets learn to respect everyone.....nomatter who they are and where they are from.

Sir, those laws are already implimented.

Go through this thread.

http://www.defence.pk/forums/announcements/224099-tameez-civility-mandatory.html

When we moderate we deal both sexes equally, this is not a feminist drama but a need of the hour in the light of past and present user feedback.

Thanks
 
.
Arey bhai how to know who is a women, psuedo names are prevalent.

Thanx for info upon two women moderators which were unknown to me. I have so far not seen any woman name here.

Are there?

Now that`s a genuine concern ... I think we must behave our self infront of all members... but a little bit more cautious infront of someone who pretend to be a lady.
Don`t go after names buddy...
 
.
Sir, those laws are already implimented.

Go through this thread.

http://www.defence.pk/forums/announcements/224099-tameez-civility-mandatory.html

When we moderate we deal both sexes equally, this is not a feminist drama but a need of the hour in the light of past and present user feedback.

Thanks
Then why try to re-define the rules with special reference to females? When the rules are already there, then why create a division? What user feedback, do we have more females here or males?
 
.
Then why try to re-define the rules with special reference to females? When the rules are already there, then why create a division? What user feedback, do we have more females here or males?

1. why are you offended ?

2. the fact that you have more males does it give you any rigt to have a free hand?

3. user feedback: there are few females and mostly active members do know them still they through their origional IDs as well as multiple ones comedown to personal attacks. Thats where the line had been drawn or should have been drawn long ago.

Some female members try to be friendly in members cafe but that does not mean that majority of the male members will take it for granted and start throwing uncivlized abuses.
 
.
Then why try to re-define the rules with special reference to females? When the rules are already there, then why create a division? What user feedback, do we have more females here or males?

Certain female members were feeling targeted by sexist comments which were personal in nature and they conveyed their concerns to the management.

Male members (a select few) have a tendency to make some remarks deemed 'tharki' in nature towards the female members. This thread is for them.

Rest assured...the rules regarding abuses and personal remarks are same for both males and females.
 
.
About time...
Good move... Thats something rampant on the forum.
@cheekybird should come back now.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
. .
Pseudo name is used, is it allowed by woman? if so, who is at fault, me?

Please reply, because it is getting serious.
 
.
Then why try to re-define the rules with special reference to females? When the rules are already there, then why create a division? What user feedback, do we have more females here or males?

A land in the sand had to be drawn after the bakwas breaking loose towards our female users. It doesn't mean we are going to discriminate males. It just means that we are just going crackdown on misogynistic idiots.
 
. . . . .
@nuclearpak What about remarks by females and rumor about male poster declared female by few posters and these sexist remarks made on those victim male posters ? :cray:

Such cases should be referred to the red team for review.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom