cabatli_53
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2008
- Messages
- 12,808
- Reaction score
- 62
- Country
- Location
Pakistan officials with T-129 Atak
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
WZ-10 has AKD-10 which is hellfire equavalent:
http://m.youtube.com/index?&desktop_uri=/#/watch?v=9CMsTtuhcuc&feature=related
Moreover, once it's powered by WZ-16 turboshaft, it will be able to carry 16 of them.
Cirit is nice but unlike apkws it is only loaded in dual or quad launchers as far as I have seen, probably due to the effect of rocket exhaust on delicate seeker head(apkws has pop out seekers on fins for this very reason) because of which it cannot be loaded in densely packed launchers, due to this it doesn't add much firepower.
purpose of discussion is not to criticize the Govt.
but i appreciate the govt dicission to import of helicopter
but there is miss understanding b/w arm forces and govt as always
like
COAS requested russian delegation 2 months earlier for mi-24
many experts suggested Chinese equipments
but govt is chooses other
why Chinese wz-10 is better because
- low price
- good record of china to deliver equipments on time
- no fear of sanctions specially war time
- modification by our own need in future
- in future we can also join Chinese in medium role helicopter program
8 Atgms are not ideal for us as we have the worlds biggest armored battles !!!!
WZ-10 is right choice for PAF as ATAK uses several US made parts; supply of mentioned parts is prone to sanction.
Why the hell you don't stop acting like an Indian who is bragging about LCA whick is not ready.
WZ-16 is something different in which French are involved.
AKD-10 <UTMAS<Hellfire why don't you understand saying something is equal don't make it equal :pissed'
New Recruit
wZ-16 is codeveloped, meaning both will hold full control on the product unlike license production that can have limiting clauses and some critical parts still being imported.
Beta pehlay aik baat samajh lay, you can't convince anybody buy just saying that this is > than that. as @Bilal. already said that if you have convince someone than you have to back up your views by sufficient proof.Soo ever noticed what WZ-10 gonna do in night time tank battles when compared to T-129??
T-129 has robust structure and ideal night time fighting capabilities and its survillance and spotting capabilities are also much better than Chineese counterpart…
Pakistan officials with T-129 Atak
There seems to be some confusion on T-129's licensing so let me try to clarify. As we all know AW-129's all rights belong to Agustawestland and that still holds true. TAI and AW created a special model, the "T-129" where AW is the subcontrator. That is, ALL RIGHTS of T-129 belongs to TAI (unlike AW-129) and Turkey is free to sell it to anyone it sees appropriate (except Italy and UK which was a part of the original deal). Hence, T-129 is not a licence production since all rights belong to solely Turkey and no one else. Now, I am talking about the gunship as a whole here. AFAIK there is one single license produced part in T-129 that is the engine. Even that is completely produced in Turkey and I am sure even under sanctions we can supply some spares to Pakistan under the table. I hope this clears it up.
care to mention 2 US nade part expect engine??
As far as i know
Turk Avionucs
turk radar
turk IRST
Turk HMDS(replaced topowl after first batch)
Airframe also produced in turkey
just the air-air missiles are of Aim series
abti tank UTMAS and some other french & US
I read somewhere that some avionics are US made.
Even if its just engine, it is enough to make problem. What if in time of war, US stops supplying spare equipment needed for engines and pressurises Turkey to do the same?
I read somewhere that some avionics are US made.
Even if its just engine, it is enough to make problem. What if in time of war, US stops supplying spare equipment needed for engines and pressurises Turkey to do the same?