What's new

World's top 100 universities under 50 years since establishment

I know you guys are grateful to Britain for creating you. :P

"India is merely a geographical expression. It is no more a single country than the equator." - Winston Churchill

The difference is that with our 100 years, we turned ourselves into a developed first-world city. Same with Singapore which is also a Chinese-majority city.

Whereas with 200 years under British rule, India has turned into a disaster, with more poverty and malnutrition than the entire continent of Africa.

I am happy that Winston Churchill is proved wrong, and it is plainly inappropriate for Chinese to claim success over Singapore.:)

As on India, remember China was not that great either until 1980. Both had similar GDP and GDP per Capita.
 
.
We don't have any autonomous district/ province.
According to the Wiki link I pasted since many people are a fan of wiki:

Autonomous regions in India include the following:
Bodoland (2003) · Chakma (1972) · Dima Hasao (1970) · Garo Hills (1952) · Gorkha Hills (1988) · Jaintia Hills (1972) · Karbi Anglong (1970) · Kargil (1995) · Khasi Hills (1952) · Lai (1972) · Leh (1995) · Mara (1972) · Tripura Tribal Areas (1982) and de facto autonomous area - North Sentinel Island (1947)

While those in UK include
Scotland (1999) · Wales (1999) · Isle of Man · Nothern Ireland

We have one passport that is blue, and on it says "The Republic of India".
That is the problem with you lot! The world does not run according to ONLY WHAT YOU KNOW...


No Idea why Indians do not do their homework:
An autonomous administrative division is an administrative division of a country that has a degree of autonomy, or freedom from an external authority. Typically it is either geographically distinct from the rest of the country or populated by a national minority. Decentralization of self-governing powers and functions to such divisions is a way for a national government to try to increase democratic participation, administrative efficiency and/or to defuse internal conflicts. Countries that include autonomous areas may be federacies, federations or confederations. Autonomous areas can be divided into territorial autonomies, subregional territorial autonomies and local autonomies.

Now how much power the govt gives this autonomous region is entirely upon them...If China wants to let them have their own passport then nothing you say or do can change it!

If India wants to be a control freak and not allow Kashimiris their own passport....nothing much we can do about it now can we?!
 
.
I am happy that Winston Churchill is proved wrong, and it is plainly inappropriate for Chinese to claim success over Singapore.:)

As on India, remember China was not that great either until 1980. Both had similar GDP and GDP per Capita.

The difference is that India was created by whites (Britain) and is still ruled by whites (Sonia).

And even then, India has more poverty and malnutrition than the entire continent of Africa. The lesson is Indians can't rule themselves, it turned a respectable world power (British India) into a country that is poorer than the continent of Africa, and growing slower too.

Whereas Hong Kong's leader is actually Chinese (CY Leung) and we are a first-world city, with the 2nd highest life expectancy in the world (whereas India has a lower life expectancy than North Korea).
 
.
According to the Wiki link I pasted since many people are a fan of wiki:

Autonomous regions in India include the following:

While those in UK include

That is the problem with you lot! The world does not run according to ONLY WHAT YOU KNOW...


No Idea why Indians do not do their homework:


Now how much power the govt gives this autonomous region is entirely upon them...If China wants to let them have their own passport then nothing you say or do can change it!

If India wants to be a control freak and not allow Kashimiris their own passport....nothing much we can do about it now can we?!

As far as I know, we don't have any autonomous regions nor do we have different passports for different regions. The list you have provided are geographic areas. Ours is a federal system where we have states and central territories. States have their own governance structures, while central territories are directly controlled by the centre. Many be some other Indian can shed light on this better than me on this.
 
.
Jade, look at all these Indian Asylum seekers desperately trying to come into Hong Kong:

Indian arrested in Hong Kong on rape charges - The Hindu

The accused had reportedly raped the university student in a guesthouse in Hong Kong’s famous Chungking Mansions, a sprawling complex of shops and cheap guesthouses that is popular with backpackers. The 26-year-old Indian man was reportedly working there illegally as a porter, and was seeking asylum in Hong Kong according to media reports. He had been granted temporary permission to stay in Hong Kong — as many asylum seekers are — although not allowed to seek employment.

And what do these Indian Asylum seekers do once they come to HK? The same thing they do back home, they rape women.
 
.
The difference is that India was created by whites (Britain) and is still ruled by whites (Sonia).

And even then, India has more poverty and malnutrition than the entire continent of Africa. The lesson is Indians can't rule themselves, it turned a respectable world power (British India) into a country that is poorer than the continent of Africa, and growing slower too.

Whereas Hong Kong's leader is actually Chinese (CY Leung) and we are a first-world city, with the 2nd highest life expectancy in the world (whereas India has a lower life expectancy than North Korea).

India was always there. The name India appeared somewhere in 350 BC. Yes, there was a lot infighting between Kingdoms, but it was more of power transfer between one ruler to other. Any attack that came west of persia was considered foreign invasion and when some foreigner invaded all the kingdoms used be united in repealing the attack. Our identity evolved over 5000 years and that is reflected in our culture, customs, the religion, the clothes we wear and food we eat that are still continuing until now and that made us Indians.
 
.
Jade, look at all these Indian Asylum seekers desperately trying to come into Hong Kong:

Indian arrested in Hong Kong on rape charges - The Hindu



And what do these Indian Asylum seekers do once they come to HK? The same thing they do back home, they rape women.

He is not a typical Indian. If he has been granted temporary permission to stay in Hong Kong, he must be there in HK for more than ten years. If he is 26 now, then he must have been very young when he entered Hong Kong, may be when British used to control HK.
 
.
We don't have any autonomous district/ province. We have one passport that is blue, and on it says "The Republic of India". Even though Kashmir has a special status in Indian Constitution, Kashmiris get the same passport as the one I have.

that's because the primitive Indians were collectively ruled by brits for 200 years, so that's why you don't have a clue
 
.
He is not a typical Indian. If he has been granted temporary permission to stay in Hong Kong, he must be there in HK for more than ten years. If he is 26 now, then he must have been very young when he entered Hong Kong, may be when British used to control HK.

no matter where you born, at the end day you are an Indian, and do what Indians do```

we have quite a few indian hotel boys r@pping some brits girls here in the U.K too

so it does not surprise me that the amount of idiocy and ignorance coming out of your posts
 
.
no matter where you born, at the end day you are an Indian, and do what Indians do```

we have quite a few indian hotel boys r@pping some brits girls here in the U.K too

so it does not surprise me that the amount of idiocy and ignorance coming out of your posts

In which hotel do you work? Are you a waiter?
 
.
@Chinese-Dragon

Why have two different passports? Why cannot you have one passport with only People's Republic of China.

It is not surprising that this phenomenon baffles you guys enormously, because of your lack of education and wisdom (in this aspect).

As I mentioned in many different posts, no country in the world, regardless how boastful it may be in terms of ideology, universal values, blahblah, dare to put two apparently contradictory and event hostile systems to co-exist peacefully, except China, who has the wisdom of imaging, proposing, then implementing a grand plan called “one country two systems”.

Chew on this for a while, buddy! Yes, I mean chewing on the meaning of “one country two systems”.

Dare USA the greatest implement a system that allowing two different ideologies, say, communism and capitalism, to co-exist peacefully?

Dare British or India allow a perceived hostile ideology to co-exist with their current democracy system?

No one. No matter how great or how “beacon for human” they claim to be, no country’s politicians have the wisdom to imagine and then the guts to implement it but China’s.

China allows two apparently contradictory and event hostile systems to co-exist peacefully so as for each to benefit from the other side the best, so as for each side to harvest the most from human wisdom.

That is why China can manipulate capitalism and authoritarianism to the best to fit its own situation. Thus, there is no surprise that China sustains such a high growth for such a long time, unprecedentedly in human history.

If you learnt some history, in earlier age, both UK and US had experimental societies to practice different ideologies (such as socialism, communism). That is one reason that both countries are strong.

Alas! Now the western developed countries are bogged down in ideological quagmire, busy in hunting witches, abroad and domestically roosted by lots ignorant and fanatics from within and without…
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Does that make any difference?

Those who do not like China's rule can go.

Actually, many of them left HK before 1997 but most of them in the end came back.

If they show no love for the country, well, go to whatever country they have love for. The same applies to certain tibetians, uighurs or whatever people they are in China.

One thing for sure. That is our land and that is for us to stay. Our determination will not be shaken a bit by anything. Who the heck care some HK Poll???




I know there of lot Hong Kongers that would not call themselves Chinese. In fact a poll in HK shows 92 percent would want to return to British rule. @Chinese-Dragon you are an exception than a norm.

Poll Says Hong Kongers Would Prefer British Rule
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
HK is not China...Its per capita is $50000 to China's $9000

On its own HK is developed world.

For HK, the credit should go to British.

Ladies and gentleman I present you an Indian in denial pot head .....
 
. .
you are insulting me by calling me an indian :P, or maybe that's how you insult people ?

I though you seem to know so much about the hotel that you work there, because I don't have any idea how hotels work or who work there.

By the way, no work is insulting.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom