What's new

‘World’s Poorest President’ Explains Why We Should Kick Rich People Out Of Politics

Dubious

RETIRED MOD
Joined
Jul 22, 2012
Messages
37,717
Reaction score
80
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Original Post Date: October 22, 2014 –

worlds-poorest-president-explains-why-we-should-kick-rich-people-out-of-politics.jpg


People who like money too much ought to be kicked out of politics, Uruguayan President José Mujica told CNN en Español in an interview posted online Wednesday.

We invented this thing called representative democracy, where we say the majority is who decides,” Mujica said in the interview. “So it seems to me that we [heads of state] should live like the majority and not like the minority.”

Dubbed the “World’s Poorest President” in a widely circulated BBC piece from 2012, Mujica reportedly donates 90 percent of his salary to charity. Mujica’s example offers a strong contrast to the United States, where in politics the median member of Congress is worth more than $1 million and corporations have many of the same rights as individuals when it comes to donating to political campaigns.

“The red carpet, people who play — those things,” Mujica said, mimicking a person playing a cornet. “All those things are feudal leftovers. And the staff that surrounds the president are like the old court.”

Mujica explained that he didn’t have anything against rich people, per se, but he doesn’t think they do a good job representing the interests of the majority of people who aren’t rich.

“I’m not against people who have money, who like money, who go crazy for money,” Mujica said. “But in politics we have to separate them. We have to run people who love money too much out of politics, they’re a danger in politics… People who love money should dedicate themselves to industry, to commerce, to multiply wealth. But politics is the struggle for the happiness of all.”

Asked why rich people make bad representatives of poor people, Mujica said: “They tend to view the world through their perspective, which is the perspective of money. Even when operating with good intentions, the perspective they have of the world, of life, of their decisions, is informed by wealth. If we live in a world where the majority is supposed to govern, we have to try to root our perspective in that of the majority, not the minority.”

Mujica has become well known for rejecting the symbols of wealth. In an interview in May, he lashed out against neckties in comments on Spanish television that went viral.

“The tie is a useless rag that constrains your neck,” Mujica said during the interview. “I’m an enemy of consumerism. Because of this hyperconsumerism, we’re forgetting about fundamental things and wasting human strength on frivolities that have little to do with human happiness.”

He lives on a small farm on the outskirts of the capital of Montevideo with his wife, Uruguayan Sen. Lucia Topolansky and their three-legged dog Manuela. He says he rejects materialism because it would rob him of the time he uses to enjoy his passions, like tending to his flower farm and working outside.

“I don’t have the hands of a president,” Mujica told CNN. “They’re kind of mangled.”

Written by Roque Planas of Breaking News and Opinion on The Huffington Post
 
Now this is my kind of President.

Botswana's former president Mogae and Masire were amongst the most humblest. I remember visiting Gaborone several years back and was in a bank when newly electect president Mogae walked in for some personal business. He stood in line with the rest. The bank manager came out to ask him he could be helped seperately, he refused. He expected the same as others. I was very impressed. A few months later i was visiting my brother in law who lives near his home. Botswana's presidential home is a very simple 5 bedroom place. A citizen can go by and see him if he was there. I usually walked by his home and that day i asked the 2 army guards posted outside his home (yes, two!!!) if the honourable president was in. He was away that day to visit another region. Mogae always said he is a civil servant meaning he is a servant of the people.

Nyerere was also very similar - his idea may have been flawed but this person who respectfully bow to any elder person.
 
Now this is my kind of President.

Botswana's former president Mogae and Masire were amongst the most humblest. I remember visiting Gaborone several years back and was in a bank when newly electect president Mogae walked in for some personal business. He stood in line with the rest. The bank manager came out to ask him he could be helped seperately, he refused. He expected the same as others. I was very impressed. A few months later i was visiting my brother in law who lives near his home. Botswana's presidential home is a very simple 5 bedroom place. A citizen can go by and see him if he was there. I usually walked by his home and that day i asked the 2 army guards posted outside his home (yes, two!!!) if the honourable president was in. He was away that day to visit another region. Mogae always said he is a civil servant meaning he is a servant of the people.

Nyerere was also very similar - his idea may have been flawed but this person who respectfully bow to any elder person.
:tup:

We need more of these kind of people and less of wanna be fairyland prince while looting the already poor whom they are supposed to serve
 
Now this is my kind of President.

Botswana's former president Mogae and Masire were amongst the most humblest. I remember visiting Gaborone several years back and was in a bank when newly electect president Mogae walked in for some personal business. He stood in line with the rest. The bank manager came out to ask him he could be helped seperately, he refused. He expected the same as others. I was very impressed. A few months later i was visiting my brother in law who lives near his home. Botswana's presidential home is a very simple 5 bedroom place. A citizen can go by and see him if he was there. I usually walked by his home and that day i asked the 2 army guards posted outside his home (yes, two!!!) if the honourable president was in. He was away that day to visit another region. Mogae always said he is a civil servant meaning he is a servant of the people.

Nyerere was also very similar - his idea may have been flawed but this person who respectfully bow to any elder person.
Wow!
 
Also applies to almost all politicos - of SA, USA, UK and elsewhere. Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was an exception. All are disgraceful. But we got no right to accuse/abuse others. Perhaps we get thieves/crooks/cheats/goons to rule over us because that is what we deserve, ourselves being the same.
 
It depends on the culture of the state than the wealth of the ldaders. This won't really work in other develping countries. If there is a culture where taking responsibility is encouraged, whether the leader rich or poor, positive reaults can be expected but generallly in other developing countries, poor heads of state are more likely to indulge in corruption. Also, many of leaders who developed East Asian countries were fairly rich.
 
The most corrupt are poorer countries.
Maybe it can be inferred that if politicians are poor they can more easily be manipulated by people with money.
Wake up to reality.Absolutely nothing beats the corruption at Wall Street-but you obviously conveniently do not talk about it.
Another point-why dont you check for yourself amount "lost" due to corruption in EU?
On topic-yes world definitely need such people in power.But do not look for them in the West where politicians from all colors are property of banks and corporations.
 
Only thing I have problem with the thread title is it presupposes all rich are bad.
If someone becomes rich after hardwork is that bad?
He is talking with respect to politics not any random rich ....People usually (both in the West and East) join politics to get rich this is apparent in after they become politicians and get VVVVIP treatment.... I mean in poor S.America this president can live on a farm without VVIP status....
Now this is my kind of President.

Botswana's former president Mogae and Masire were amongst the most humblest. I remember visiting Gaborone several years back and was in a bank when newly electect president Mogae walked in for some personal business. He stood in line with the rest. The bank manager came out to ask him he could be helped seperately, he refused. He expected the same as others. I was very impressed. A few months later i was visiting my brother in law who lives near his home. Botswana's presidential home is a very simple 5 bedroom place. A citizen can go by and see him if he was there. I usually walked by his home and that day i asked the 2 army guards posted outside his home (yes, two!!!) if the honourable president was in. He was away that day to visit another region. Mogae always said he is a civil servant meaning he is a servant of the people.

Nyerere was also very similar - his idea may have been flawed but this person who respectfully bow to any elder person.
In a poor and disturbed continent like Africa (generalizing I do know some of Africa is doing well) this guy could live a normal man's life than what the hell is stopping people from automatically becoming VVIP? with tens of bodyguards, mansion on acres of land and unlimited supply of petrol for the numerous cars and even a private jet?

- You need millions to campaign and when you owe your sponsors that much shit usually follows ....
 
Being "poor" allows this man to see the struggles and challenges of what much of his people face, and hence it makes his decision-making process a tad more realistic and selfless than most other leaders.
 
Only thing I have problem with the thread title is it presupposes all rich are bad.
If someone becomes rich after hardwork is that bad?
Yes...Hard work is good but benefiting from your own hard work is bad. It does not matter if you are an honest man, the undertone here is that if you live better than your neighbor, no matter how little, you are a bad person.
 
Also applies to almost all politicos - of SA, USA, UK and elsewhere. Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was an exception. All are disgraceful. But we got no right to accuse/abuse others. Perhaps we get thieves/crooks/cheats/goons to rule over us because that is what we deserve, ourselves being the same.
Indeed Ahmadinejad had guts.... That is what is lacking in the 3rd world. Too subservient to powers from outside.
 
wow...Simply wow...

How is saying that a top cream doesnt represent the majority (which democracy is based on) wrong? Apparently people love to be ruled by rich brats wonder why they object to monarchy (rich brats by birth) - just coz they didnt earn doesnt mean they still arent rich as for those who earned it then run your business....country isnt a business it is a country.....

The whole article is about the large difference between a poor and a rich and people are jumping to compare little difference...Maybe some cant comprehend poor president, who represent the majority and lives with them theory
 
Back
Top Bottom