What's new

World sees new super power.

VERY Juvenile.

Sort of like when YOU constantly display your racism towards Chinese people? :rofl:

Chinese people are really really rude. They don't care about others.

That was not being racist, Chinese people are rude, its a fact I have noticed it among Chinese in this country and many people have noticed it in China.

look at how it is on here, people usually Chinese calling people ignorant and stupid when they dont agree with them.
 
VERY Juvenile.

Oh, "Juvenile"? are you referring to this? :hang2:
5.6.gif

Juvenile american indians natives Drug Abuse Violations
Feel really sorry for all those poisoning they apply on American Indians.
 
Indeed China still has a long way to go. It is a very good sign that the Chinese people aren't even celebratory. On a side note, CAPTAIN AMERICAN also produces eight times as many posts as a Chinese member on this forum.
 
Why isn't Captain American banned yet? He derails absolutely every thread he posts in and make it impossible to talk seriously about anything.

For every one post he write, three more useless off topic posts gets added to answer him.
 
Why isn't Captain American banned yet?

It's better if he is NOT banned.

He makes America look so ridiculous, it's better to keep him around.

Also he generates a lot of empathy for Chinese members. In that other thread about censorship, he even caused all the Indian members to stick up for the Chinese. :cheers:
 
Oh, "Juvenile"? are you referring to this? :hang2:
5.6.gif

Juvenile american indians natives Drug Abuse Violations
Feel really sorry for all those poisoning they apply on American Indians.
Really? So who is this 'they'? The government? Amerinds on tribal lands falls under the tribal authority jurisdiction. No one force anyone to use illegal hallucinogenics. Shed your crocodile tears all you want but do not be dishonest.
 
It's better if he is NOT banned.

He makes America look so ridiculous, it's better to keep him around.

Also he generates a lot of empathy for Chinese members. In that other thread about censorship, he even caused all the Indian members to stick up for the Chinese. :cheers:

No one looks good in that argument.
 
Really? So who is this 'they'? The government? Amerinds on tribal lands falls under the tribal authority jurisdiction. No one force anyone to use illegal hallucinogenics. Shed your crocodile tears all you want but do not be dishonest.

Hey, viet-commie, its not about vietnamese drug abuses, why so work up? need one for vietnamese too?:lol: Na, you ain't worth my breath.:argh:
 
GDP does not MEAN anything.

GDP is the total costs of goods and services produced. In other words how much MONEY has changed hands inside a country.

Gross Domestic Output = Consumption + Investment + Government Spending + Exports – Imports

So if the government lends money to people to build a Walmart that other people would then buy from.

And then theres also the lending chain, if the government gives money to one bank that then lends money to another bank, and that bank lends it to another bank and then that money gets lent back to the government you will get GDP growth even though nothing really happened.

How GDP is calculated is that each major business just fills out a form that shows how much money they earned from domestic consumption and the amount of moeny they invested.

So each of these banks would sign off that they have investments

The GDP does not take into account DEBT
 
China's Not a Superpower
Minxin Pei
The Diplomat, December 29, 2009

In world history, only one country--the United States--has truly acquired all the capabilities of a superpower: a technologically advanced economy, a hi-tech military, a fully integrated nation, insuperable military and economic advantages vis-a-vis potential competitors, capacity to provide global public goods and an appealing ideology. Even in its heydays, the former Soviet Union was, at best, a one-dimensional superpower--capable of competing against the United States militarily, but lacking all the other crucial instruments of national power.

Meanwhile, the challenges China faces in becoming the next superpower are truly daunting. Even as its economic output is expected to exceed $5 trillion in 2010, per capita income in China will remain under $4000, roughly one-tenth of the level of the United States and Japan. More than half of the Chinese population still live in villages, most without access to safe drinking water, basic healthcare, or decent education. With urbanization growing at about 1 percent a year, it will take another three decades for China to reduce the size of its peasantry to a quarter of the population. As long as China has an oversized peasantry, with hundreds of millions of low-income rural residents surviving on the margins of modernity, it is unlikely to become a real superpower.

In fact, the likelihood that China’s growth will slow down significantly in the next two decades is real and even substantial. Several favourable structural factors, such as the demographic dividend (derived from a relatively younger population), virtually unlimited access to the global markets, high savings rates and discounted environmental costs, will gradually disappear. Like Japan,

As the world’s second largest exporter (although China is expected to surpass Germany as the world’s largest exporter in 2010), China is encountering protectionist resistance in its major markets (the United States and Europe). In particular, China’s policy of maintaining an under-valued currency to keep its exports competitive is now being blamed for worsening global imbalances and weakening the economies of its trading partners.

A third constraint on China’s future growth is environmental degradation. Over the past three decades, China has neglected its environment for the sake of economic growth, with disastrous consequences. Today, air and water pollution kills about 750,000 people a year. The aggregate costs of pollution are roughly 8 percent of the GDP. Official estimates suggest that mitigating environmental degradation requires an investment of an additional 1.5 percent of GDP each year. Climate change will severely affect China’s water supplies and exacerbate the drought in the north. China’s business-as-usual approach to growth, which relies on cheap energy and no-cost pollution, will no longer be sustainable

First and foremost, Chinese leaders will find themselves in search of a global vision and a political mission. Countries don’t become superpowers merely because they have acquired hard power. The exercise of power must be informed by ideas and visions that have universal appeal

. At the moment, China is economically prosperous but ideologically bankrupt. It believes in neither communism nor liberal democracy

China's Not a Superpower - Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
 
Hey, viet-commie, its not about vietnamese drug abuses, why so work up? need one for vietnamese too?:lol: Na, you ain't worth my breath.:argh:
Of course not. It is about your lies that can be easily exposed.
 
At the moment, China is economically prosperous but ideologically bankrupt. It believes in neither communism nor liberal democracy

Yes the new ideology is pragmatism. :thinktank:

Have you finally realised what the word "Communism" means? :rofl:

com·mu·nism (kmy-nzm)
n.
1. (Government, Politics & Diplomacy) advocacy of a classless society in which private ownership has been abolished and the means of production and subsistence belong to the community
1. A theoretical economic system characterized by the collective ownership of property and by the organization of labor for the common advantage of all members.

Clearly this does not apply to modern China, which has private property, and even a "market economy". Our market economy is now even the second largest in the world.
 
Yes the new ideology is pragmatism. :thinktank:

Have you finally realised what the word "Communism" means? :rofl:



Clearly this does not apply to modern China, which has private property, and even a "market economy". Which is now the second largest one in the world.
This means we should have a new definition of 'communism': epic fail.

Agree?
 
Back
Top Bottom