spectribution
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2013
- Messages
- 632
- Reaction score
- -4
- Country
- Location
Did I say anything against that?
No.
What you said is generally true.
But my point went into another direction. My original point was that if a woman has the physical strength, endurance and the willpower to complete the 1 mile run in a good time, manages to do 10 pull ups, the balance test and the 9 ft ditch she is able to perform combat duties, from a physical point of view. The people who made those requirements did not come up with them without any thought. (This are the Indian Army requirements, which are indeed quite low and actually do not emphasis much upper body strength, but my point can be transferred to any other armies PT test as well.)
Whether men and women who passed all the requirements can achieve the same training goals using the same training program, rest ratio, nutrition etc etc in a specific time frame does not really matter in the military. They are not professional athletes or competitive bodybuilders.
Less than 1% of women are that fit. And that is minimum requirement. Most men exceed that limit. Army will always take whats best, not weaklings.
NOTE : KEEP LIBERAL FEMINISTS AND SOCIALISTS OUT OF DECISION MAKING THEY WILL RUIN THE ARMED FORCES AND THE ECONOMY.