in other words you want the IMF to be a punching bag for the austerity measuresAre you people illiterate or just stupid? Please read beyond the headlines.
The IMF said if reforms are not undertaken, growth will be low. As we know the very same REFORMS ARE BEING UNDERTAKEN. We know this because most of you like to b1tch and whine about the impact these reforms will have on your pocket.
The loan itself is not the big deal - we probably could have gotten a loan from elsewhere. What really matters is the austerity measures that will take place.
Expect much more of this in the future - no more living for free. No more subsidised fuel paid for by loans.
why would affluent nations get WB/IMF loans ?S Korea relied heavily in Japan for loans since the WB would not finance its projects....saying it's economy was too small. Look at S Korea today. There economist in S Korea that urge not to go the WB/IMF route since their medicine hurts developing nations more than it helps.
Wb/imf push western political interests. Population control is major objective of this institutions. Largest loans are given to affluent nations with pro american leaders.