What's new

Wise words from an old warrior

fatman17

PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
32,563
Reaction score
98
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Wise words from an old warrior

By Ardeshir Cowasjee

Sunday, 26 Apr, 2009 | 03:01 AM PST Ardeshir Cowasjee quotes words of wisdom by Air Marshal Asghar Khan. Air Marshal Asghar Khan, once, long ago, in what were the ‘good old days,’ was the world’s youngest chief of an air force, Pakistan’s air force, which he led with distinction.

Following his retirement, he involved himself in politics and formed his own party in 1972 which he led from the front. Those who joined him and then left for greener pastures would fill the pages of a present-day Pakistani who’s who. His participation in the uprising against Zulfikar Ali Bhutto landed him in jail for a few months in early 1977. Later, for his opposition to the rule of President Gen Ziaul Haq he spent 1,603 days under house arrest at his home in Abbottabad. Undeterred, he pressed on, and by 1994, tired and disillusioned, ended his political life.

But inactivity did not follow — he travels and frequently speaks. On April 20, he came to Karachi to address the Jinnah Society and there is much that was said by this wise man, who has seen it all, that deserves reproduction.

He asked what we have done to Jinnah’s Pakistan since his death, and then gave the answers: ‘The first blow to his vision of Pakistan was the so-called ‘Objectives Resolution’ passed within six months of his death. This turned Pakistan into an Islamic state which was not the vision of the founder of this country. Jinnah had said very clearly that the state would not interfere in religious matters. This departure from the concept that the creator of this country had about Pakistan has led us rapidly to the state of civil war we are in today. Initially it started with Shia-Sunni killings, and now we have the emergence of a band of fanatics who appear bent on destroying the Pakistan that Jinnah built.

‘In encouraging this, the United States and Ziaul Haq played a major role in mobilising the youth of the NWFP against the Soviet Union in the 1980s. Having become the ‘most dangerous country in the world’, Pakistan is also known as one of the half a dozen most corrupt nations. To be successful in politics in Pakistan you have to fool the people, and most of those who have succeeded in getting into power have done this successfully. Pakistan has the distinction of being led at different times by acknowledged criminals of world fame.’

He then dwelt on a subject that is mightily agitating the rest of the world in these times of troubles in which we now find ourselves, but which is largely ignored by both leadership and people who tend to brush off the dangers posed. ‘If Pakistan survives this kind of so-called popular leadership, there is another more serious threat to its existence. That is the pride we take in being a nuclear power. Ever since Pakistan started to arm itself with nuclear weapons, I have spoken and written against it because I believe that rather than strengthening Pakistan’s defence it endangers its safety and survival.

‘From the Jan 31, 2009 issue of The Economist, in an article entitled ‘Losing their way’, we learn that the United Kingdom is equipped at great cost to fight a nuclear war, whereas it should be preparing to fight a conventional war. If this is true of the UK it is more so of Pakistan. The cost of acquiring nuclear capability by Pakistan has not been made public but it has surely increased the defence budget manifold, at great cost to the national exchequer. This has, in turn, increased the miseries of the people.

‘The UK’s defence budget is half that of its budget for education and about one third of its health budget. In Pakistan the expenditure on defence is many times the country’s expenditure on both education and health. If the amount spent on the nuclear programme had been spent on education, the country would not have been at the mercy of the Taliban as it is today. This criminal misuse of national resources has cost the country dearly.

‘Until recently when the so-called Taliban became a problem, our defence expenditure was meant only to meet a threat from India. The fact is that in the last 60 years of our existence, India has not started hostilities against Pakistan unless provoked to do so, or until we created conditions, as we did in 1971 in East Pakistan, for India to interfere militarily….

‘Pakistan’s nuclear capability, by our own admission, is ‘India-specific’. India can justify its nuclear capability for different reasons. It has experienced hostilities with China, and is aspiring to be one of the permanent members of the Security Council, for which it feels that being a nuclear power would be a qualification. Its size, population, location and resources should, it could argue, entitle it to be a permanent member of the Security Council. Moreover, its relations with the United States and the latter’s desire to balance China’s influence and power in Asia is likely to assure for it the support of the United States and the western world….

‘If we did not have nuclear weapons, declared ourselves to be a non-nuclear state, and opened ourselves to international inspection, there would be no possibility of India or any other country using nuclear weapons against us…. [W]e should therefore prepare only for a conventional war. Wisdom demands that we stop planning for a nuclear war which, unless we start one, we will not have to fight. It is both unwise and unnecessary to prepare for the ‘wrong war’ which could destroy us even without fighting one.

‘In the last 60 years, self-serving politicians have exploited our emotional people for their own political advancement and have led the nation to a situation that does not serve the interests of the country and could result in its destruction.’

Now, if all that we read and hear carries weight, our self-serving politicians are leading us by the nose down a dark alleyway and may well succeed in bringing this country to its knees. Given the inactivity and relaxed attitude of army and government in the face of the advancing horde (to many of us the enemy at the gates), the world is justified in fearing that our nuclear assets may go astray — as indeed are we citizens who must be imbued with the same fears until those on top lower their raised hands, control or eliminate the invaders, and come to the rescue of their country.

arfc@cyber.net.pk
 
.
Wise words indeed from a True Warrior.

All of us armchair Generals should note the views Air Marshal Asghar Khan.
 
.
ofcourse being an INDIAN you would love such words they must be music to your ears...but let me correct it Jinnah didn't want a secular pakistan but he niether did want an extremist pakistan he wanted NATION to be surpeme but the nation should follow prinicipals from islam!!!
 
.
I do think that at the time no "wise man" at the time of the tension of Indian and Pakistan would want an unarmed Pakistan.
 
.
i have serious reservations about this article.
Firstly, Pakistan has been weakened by strife and disharmony due to regionalism(internally). Whereas there areother ways of dealing with it, people need a platform to be gathered together. Being Pakistani has clearly not worked, because we still think of ourselves as Sindhi, Punjabi etc etc. If 97%population of this country is Muslim, why cant we gather under the platform of islam? I hasten to sy, my islam is not the ***** and rigid Islam of the Taliban. However, if we are reasonable, Pakistan can have an Islamic ideology as a focus towards nation building.
Secondly, whereas there is merit in the debate of a non nuclear pakistan, this debate at this junctureis like an Ostrich approach. We dont need to hide it from anyone. we are a nuclear nation. I personally think , unlike Mr Cawasjee or Asghar Khan ,that it has prewvented at least 2 /3 wars between India and pakistan. So nuclearization is initself acting as a deterrent. As to our current condition, it is the bad planning of successive Governments which has led us to this stage, including the corruption within our own rank and file. There are certainly external factors, but these would have persisted inspite of our wanting to do something about it or not. So like it or not pakistan could not have escaped the current predicament it findis itself in.
With regards to India, I would like to say that contrary to the belief of the Author India cannot be absolved of the responsibility of creating havoc in the region. Kashmir and tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka have their origins in Indian policy. India could have resolved a lot of the regional problems by resolving the kashmir conflict, which it clearly want s to hold on to.
waSalam
Araz
 
.
Pakistan was created as an islamic state. Iqbal had given the idea of pakistan as an islamic state. if u read his poetry, u will find it everywhere. he also said western system of governance (democracy) is flawed as it weigh numbers and not character
also if u read jinnah's speach on the opening day of state bank of pakistan, he even talked about islamic financial system. Jinnah also said that idea of pakistan came into existance the day when first hindu converted to islam (or it was when first muslim stepped on the sub continent). now where exactly do we find any of our leaders talkin about other than a muslim state??
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom