What's new

Wikileaks Diplomatic Cables

This one takes the cake -

Washington is running a secret intelligence campaign targeted at the leadership of the United Nations, including the secretary general, Ban Ki-moon and the permanent security council representatives from China, Russia, France and the UK.

A classified directive which appears to blur the line between diplomacy and spying was issued to US diplomats under Hillary Clinton's name in July 2009, demanding forensic technical details about the communications systems used by top UN officials, including passwords and personal encryption keys used in private and commercial networks for official communications.

It called for detailed biometric information "on key UN officials, to include undersecretaries, heads of specialised agencies and their chief advisers, top SYG [secretary general] aides, heads of peace operations and political field missions, including force commanders" as well as intelligence on Ban's "management and decision-making style and his influence on the secretariat". A parallel intelligence directive sent to diplomats in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Uganda, Rwanda and Burundi said biometric data included DNA, fingerprints and iris scans.

Washington also wanted credit card numbers, email addresses, phone, fax and pager numbers and even frequent-flyer account numbers for UN figures and "biographic and biometric information on UN Security Council permanent representatives".

The secret "national human intelligence collection directive" was sent to US missions at the UN in New York, Vienna and Rome; 33 embassies and consulates, including those in London, Paris and Moscow.

The operation targetted at the UN appears to have involved all of Washington's main intelligence agencies. The CIA's clandestine service, the US Secret Service and the FBI were included in the "reporting and collection needs" cable alongside the state department under the heading "collection requirements and tasking".

The leak of the directive is likely to spark questions about the legality of the operation and about whether state department diplomats are expected to spy. The level of technical and personal detail demanded about the UN top team's communication systems could be seen as laying the groundwork for surveillance or hacking operations. It requested "current technical specifications, physical layout and planned upgrades to telecommunications infrastructure and information systems, networks and technologies used by top officials and their support staff", as well as details on private networks used for official comunication, "to include upgrades, security measures, passwords, personal encryption keys and virtual private network versions used".

The UN has previously asserted that bugging the secretary general is illegal, citing the 1946 UN convention on priveleges and immunities which states: "The premises of the United Nations shall be inviolable. The property and assets of the United Nations, wherever located and by whomsoever held, shall be immune from search, requisition, confiscation, expropriation and any other form of interference, whether by executive, administrative, judicial or legislative action".

The 1961 Vienna convention on diplomatic relations, which covers the UN, also states that "the official correspondence of the mission shall be inviolable".
 
Jackdaws said:
Also, I've never seen Pakistanis criticize Iran and very few of them criticize the Arabs - so where does Pakistan as a state and where do Pakistanis as a people stand on the Iran / Arab divide?

Maybe because Pakistan is 85% Sunni ? :confused:
 
Saudi King called Zardari greatest obstacle to Pak progress: report

NEW YORK: Saudi King Abdullah called President Asif Ali Zardari the greatest obstacle to Pakistan’s progress, according to an online report of New York Times that quoted Wikileaks as saying.

The report further quoted King Abdullah as saying: “When the head is rotten, it affects the whole body.”

The cables released by Wikileaks, the whistle-blower, disclose that aging monarch of Saudi Arabia, King Abdullah, as speaking scathingly about the leaders of Iraq and Pakistan.

Speaking to another Iraqi official about Nuri Kamal al-Maliki, the Iraqi prime minister, King Abdullah said, “You and Iraq are in my heart, but that man is not.” The king called President Asif Ali Zardari of Pakistan the greatest obstacle to that country’s progress. “When the head is rotten,” he said, “it affects the whole body.”

AFP quoting US documents leaked by WikiLeaks and published by Britain's Guardian newspaper, said King Abdullah urged the United States to attack Iran to destroy its nuclear programme.

Leaked memos from US embassies across the Middle East recorded the king's "frequent exhortations to the US to attack Iran and so put an end to its nuclear weapons program."

The memo showed that the king told the United States to "cut off the head of the snake," and said that working with Washington to roll back Iranian influence in Iraq was "a strategic priority for the king and his government."

11-29-2010_75020_l.gif


Saudi King called Zardari greatest obstacle to Pak progress: report - GEO.tv
 
I now know (which I didn't earlier) that Arabs hate the Iranians. Can someone tell me why? Is it because Iran is Shia?

Also, I've never seen Pakistanis criticize Iran and very few of them criticize the Arabs - so where does Pakistan as a state and where do Pakistanis as a people stand on the Iran / Arab divide?

Maybe because Pakistan is 85% Sunni ? :confused:

Just like our stand on Palestine - Israel.

Gotta credit the Pakistanis for this.
 
and what good was / is Mr Saud to his country !? less oil you guys are nothing but nomads
 
Muslim Ummah thing will happen on its time .. it just need some things around the world to EVOLVE in a favorable manner.. Its not something which can be forcefully brought about...!!!
 
I agree with this man about Zardari but it shows how much of a hypocrite he is because he isn't any better than Zardari.
 
I agree with this man about Zardari but it shows how much of a hypocrite he is because he isn't any better than Zardari.

That doesn't clears zardari either. This person is 2000 times worse than x-president but I am only being careful.. .in reality zardari could be 3000 times worse!
 
ALL of them hate Iran. Besides Saudi, even the smaller ones UAE, Oman, Kuwait etc. which completely loathe the Iranians.
I am surprised a little bit for Qatar
But of course i know so much the hatred of UAE, Oman, Kuwait, Saudis
this is well known

it is not only shia it is persian too
but being shia made us be bad muslims and bad people to their eyes: you know the first thing the talibans did when they entered Kaboul is kill the Iranian diplomats
 
Any thing about BD?

By the way, hate for Saudi.
 
Back
Top Bottom