No country can defeat the US on ground or anywhere else. Case closed...(US can defeat anyone anywhere, because the war if there is one..which I dont think will happen, will be fought on US terms.
You're wrong again. Ever heard about the Sino-Russia border conflict in 1969? Where hundreds of thousands of soldiers were committed and hundreds died? Possession of Nukes did not prevent that conflict from happening and it did not escalate into an all-out war either.
well yes, the Soviets were fighting for/in their own territory(not for another country) So they had every reason to engage in war/shed their blood for this/same with China. Its also why they didn't intervene when China invaded Vietnam years later (even though they had a mutual defence agreement with Vietnam). The thing is no major power will accept to shed its blood for you, more even so when it means fighting/putting its own territory in danger for you. The risks far outweight any gains from this, even more so when it means fighting a nuclear power as well. except that country itself is being threatened then yes. If not, then its a NO, NO.
However this isnt the case with the contested islands in SCS which isnt a U.S territory and which several countries are claiming it as theirs. So why would the U.S risks a major war which will affect its economy and maybe even territory over these small islands with no real value?lool As i said as it stands the U.S already controls Asia from its military bases in Japan, Korea, acess to bases in Philippines to diego Garcia in Indian ocean facing India, to its bases in Hawaii etc It simply has no reason to risk a major war for these islands, if not even during the scarboroh shoal incident it would have intervened(having a mutual defence treaty with Philippines). The reason is its simply too trivial a reason for the U.S to engaged itself for these small matters. However, if China or even Russia to make any move against/threaten U.S military bases in Japan/South Korea. Diego Garcia or hawaii, then thats another matter altogether, which will justifiably require a swift military response from the U.S no matter if its means going to all out war(even a nuclear one).
The thing is no major power will accept to shed its blood for you, more even so when it means fighting/putting its own territory in danger for you...
... However this isnt the case with the contested islands in SCS which isnt a U.S territory and which several countries are claiming it as theirs. So why would the U.S risks a major war which will affect its economy and maybe even territory over these small islands with no real value?lool As i said as it stands the U.S already controls Asia from its military bases in Japan, Korea, acess to bases in Philippines to diego Garcia in Indian ocean facing India, to its bases in Hawaii etc It simply has no reason to risk a major war for these islands, if not even during the scarboroh shoal incident it would have intervened(having a mutual defence treaty with Philippines). The reason is its simply too trivial a reason for the U.S to engaged itself for these small matters. However, if China or even Russia to make any move against/threaten U.S military bases in Japan/South Korea. Diego Garcia or hawaii, then thats another matter altogether, which will justifiably require a swift military response from the U.S no matter if its means going to all out war(even a nuclear one).
Who has the interests to ask US go to war in the SCS?How many countries have the US defeated so far in the past in a war that involved China - when China was really backward in weaponry and when US was much advanced and backed by its allies
Without USA, the Japanese wont stand a chance against either China or Russia
Who has the interests to ask US go to war in the SCS?
Strange. Why don't you count another country? Twins, do you know?Very difficult question
Let me see:
Indians - they can be the supa powa at last
Finally this is the only chance to realise their dream that has been keeping them wetting their pants for over 60 years
Of course the U.S will allow us to use our nuclear weapons if we were to come under attack. Since the U.S will also be greatly affected by it, it also has a military base here as well(though a minor one). Moreover our nuclear based deterent is mainly sea based, and its diffcult to keep tag of nuclear submarines, so no country can dare us in the first place..
We all know (well i thought we all did) there will never be a war between nuclear powers, since no power can attack a nuclear one, NEVER. Not even the U.S will ever attack small crude backward North Korea, nor wil any nuclear power: China/Russia ever dare attack us. So forget about other bigger nuclear powers. Its just our fanboyism on here that makes us say such unrealistic stuffs/wishful thinking. Nothing more.
Strange. Why don't you count another country? Twins, do you know?
To me, the writer just want to find another business, and the poster just want to find any potential candidates for support.
