sahaliyan
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2008
- Messages
- 742
- Reaction score
- -1
O3a is not Chinese,Sinitic or even Sino-Tibetan,it's too old,more than 20000 years old(even older than N-M231 as a whole,and N exist in many nations),in that time,no Chinese existThe Fudan University has conducted many SNP tests, and I was pretty shocked when I saw a such large amount of the exotic haplogroups such as N and Q, even R1a among the modern Chinese men.
However, the O3a is still quite dominant as over 60%.
Maybe the NO and RQ are not Caucasoid from the beginning, since R might steal a large amount of Caucasoid women from the native Europeans such as I and J.
And O3a-M324 exist in many nations too,Sino-Tibetan,Hmong-Mien,Altaic and Japonic-Koreanic,the relationship is pre-history,before any nations exist.
Such as the largest tribe of Kazakhs are Naimans,it's said there are 2 million Naiman Kazakhs in the world,yet the majority of Naimans are a subclade of O3a-M324,O3a2c1b-F444
The Jeonju Lee family,who ruled Korea 500 years,also belong to O3a2c1b-F444
vagabond : 한국 이씨의 부계 하플로와 M134 이성계 모달-1
Can we say the Naimans and Jeonju Lees are Chinese,Sinitic or Sino-Tibetan?Of course,we can't
The core of Sino-Tibetan population is a subclade of O3a-M324,O3a2c1a-M117,other O3a has nothing to do with Sino-Tibetans