What's new

Why Pakistan will never acknowledge the surgical strikes from India? - 10 Reasons

Status
Not open for further replies.

Trisonics

BANNED
Joined
Mar 6, 2009
Messages
1,997
Reaction score
-13
Why Pakistan will never acknowledge the surgical strikes from India?

Reason 1: After all the statements of bravado like "we will give a befitting response", super duper shows of aircrafts taking off from highways, they have been left speechless. Their preparedness will be questioned.

Reason 2: IF they admit, they have to respond. Their is no element of surprise left, Indian military is already expecting a response. If the loses are high in the eventuality that they respond, it's another major setback.

Reason 3: Unknown to us all, important nations may be tightening their grip on Pakistan not to escalate.

Reason 4: Admitting to the response also means admitting to the terror camps within it's own territory, it's state policy of terrorism.

Reason 5: Admitting would mean the rest of the world believing what India says about the so called uprising in Kashmir is funded and Pakistani terrorists causing all the trouble

Reason 6: Conventionally, India is stronger militarily. While Pakistan can cause damage, it can never sustain against the might of India's force.

Reason 7: Baluchistan has beeped up on the radar much to their discomfort, can any escalation lead to the unrest being taken advantage off?

Reason 8: CPEC. Escalations, small war would mean Pakistan will undo whatever economic gains it has seen, will China and other nations see CPEC as safe?

Reason 9: India has more influence in Afghaniztan, Iran and Bangladesh. Can India incite trouble from these areas if there was any escalation?

Reason 10: With US and India signing a pact on sharing military logistics China will distance itself from any situation involving Indo-Pak war actions. Is China in Pakistan's plan for any retaliation it plans against India?

Lastly, India has officially announced that it did carry Surgical Strikes. They have no reason to provide evidence. It is Pakistan's so called territory that was intruded so the onus is on them to provide evidence that it never happened. India does not need to prove anything to anybody...it was area under Pakistan's control that was intruded so it will stick to that story.

The above are my opinions so there is absolutely no need to troll. Agree, disagree of plain agree to disagree.

TY
 
. . . .
Pakistan have said it was only cross border firing. Indians are telling that it was surgical strike. Why dont Indian release proof of surgical strike if Indian soldiers were inside Pakistan.
 
. .
India pls
we conducted a surgical strike yesterday and killed 8 of your soldiers and also made on POW.......
 
.
So what are reasons for leaving 8 dead bodies behind and not rescuing one captured soldier?
 
.
Why we will not accept indian surgical strikes story

Reason 1- Because its bull shit:cheesy:


Take your nonsensical, air dropping, 150 soldier attack, 3 km into Pakistan, following a 10 hour trek with 4 hours of fighting somewhere else
This bollywood dramabazi may work in india but not anywhere else in the world
 
.
so I take, going by the troll posts here, that you really have no counter reasoning? calling us gandus only shows you are frustrated which has been manifested in scores of threads. If you cannot counter, let's just get civil for once and just say disagree and give your reasons..
 
.
Why Pakistan will never acknowledge the surgical strikes from India?

Reason 1: After all the statements of bravado like "we will give a befitting response", super duper shows of aircrafts taking off from highways, they have been left speechless. Their preparedness will be questioned.

Reason 2: IF they admit, they have to respond. Their is no element of surprise left, Indian military is already expecting a response. If the loses are high in the eventuality that they respond, it's another major setback.

Reason 3: Unknown to us all, important nations may be tightening their grip on Pakistan not to escalate.

Reason 4: Admitting to the response also means admitting to the terror camps within it's own territory, it's state policy of terrorism.

Reason 5: Admitting would mean the rest of the world believing what India says about the so called uprising in Kashmir is funded and Pakistani terrorists causing all the trouble

Reason 6: Conventionally, India is stronger militarily. While Pakistan can cause damage, it can never sustain against the might of India's force.

Reason 7: Baluchistan has beeped up on the radar much to their discomfort, can any escalation lead to the unrest being taken advantage off?

Reason 8: CPEC. Escalations, small war would mean Pakistan will undo whatever economic gains it has seen, will China and other nations see CPEC as safe?

Reason 9: India has more influence in Afghaniztan, Iran and Bangladesh. Can India incite trouble from these areas if there was any escalation?

Reason 10: With US and India signing a pact on sharing military logistics China will distance itself from any situation involving Indo-Pak war actions. Is China in Pakistan's plan for any retaliation it plans against India?

Lastly, India has officially announced that it did carry Surgical Strikes. They have no reason to provide evidence. It is Pakistan's so called territory that was intruded so the onus is on them to provide evidence that it never happened. India does not need to prove anything to anybody...it was area under Pakistan's control that was intruded so it will stick to that story.

The above are my opinions so there is absolutely no need to troll. Agree, disagree of plain agree to disagree.

TY
This is the level of critical thinking from an average Indian, no matter how easily you lot can be taken for a joy ride by your babus.
On topic Pakistan will acknowledge something when it happens and not myths and hawai firing (aerial firing by Indians)
If history is anything to go by than of all the times when is it that Pakistan has not responded to Indian provocation? If Indian military might is so superior how come Pakistan is than accused of stirring trouble? I mean what kind of weak nation are we that we dont stop poking the mighty super power India.
India started border violation we responded back, we even captured your soldiers forget about those that bite the dust and are now lying with no one to pick their dead bodies.
I dont know why am i even trying to defend it. I mean i dont mind if you Indians like to live in delusions. But the saner minds in India have already started questioning this so called strike. In the end i would say go figure out the meaning of the word surgical strike and how it happens instead beating the same drum every now and than.
 
.
India pls
we conducted a surgical strike yesterday and killed 8 of your soldiers and also made on POW.......

India made an official statement. Unless you are the PM or Leader of your military, you are talking garbage.
 
.
so I take, going by the troll posts here, that you really have no counter reasoning? calling us gandus only shows you are frustrated which has been manifested in scores of threads. If you cannot counter, let's just get civil for once and just say disagree and give your reasons..

Isnt the 10 hour trekking, air dropping, crossing heavily manned LOC and 4 hour fire fight with alleged terrorists enough to send you bull shit meter into the red?

I mean where is your brain
 
.
This is the level of critical thinking from an average Indian, no matter how easily you lot can be taken for a joy ride by your babus.
On topic Pakistan will acknowledge something when it happens and not myths and hawai firing (aerial firing by Indians)
If history is anything to go by than of all the times when is it that Pakistan has not responded to Indian provocation? If Indian military might is so superior how come Pakistan is than accused of stirring trouble? I mean what kind of weak nation are we that we dont stop poking the mighty super power India.
India started border violation we responded back, we even captured your soldiers forget about those that bite the dust and are now lying with no one to pick their dead bodies.
I dont know why am i even trying to defend it. I mean i dont mind if you Indians like to live in delusions. But the saner minds in India have already started questioning this so called strike. In the end i would say go figure out the meaning of the word surgical strike and how it happens instead beating the same drum every now and than.

What you spoke applies more to Pakistan. Pakistan claims they have tons and truck loads of proof of Indian terrorism but still lack the spine to counter it effectively. Your reaction to OBL strike and Kargil were similar. Stop living in denial, what I stated in my post are all real.
 
.
Because Pakistanis just like rest of the world do not consider inter-galactic stealth aeroplanes, which are in your use for more than thousands of years, as being real.

The day you wake up and actually fly a plane towards Pakistan, we'll acknowledge SirGKal strikes.

Untill then enjoy living in parallel universe. :alcoholic:
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom