What's new

Why Pakistan is wealthier than India

Yes, that's rights.

What are the Types of GDP?
GPD can be measured in several different ways. The most common methods include:

  • Nominal GDP – the total value of all goods and services produced at current market prices. This includes all the changes in market prices during the current year due to inflation or deflation.
  • Real GDP – the sum of all goods and services produced at constant prices. The prices used in determining the Gross Domestic Product are based on a certain base year or the previous year. This provides a more accurate account of economic growth, as it is already an inflation-adjusted measurement, meaning the effects of inflation are taken out.
  • Actual GDP – real-time measurement of all outputs at any interval or any given time. It demonstrates the existing state of business of the economy.
  • Potential GDP – ideal economic condition with 100% employment across all sectors, steady currency, and stable product prices.
What is included in GDP?

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the monetary value, in local currency, of all final economic goods and services produced in a country during a specific period of time. It is the broadest financial measurement of a nation’s total economic activity. The total goods and services bought by consumers encompasses all private expenditures, government spending, investments, and exports but excludes imports that take place within a designated country. Below are three different approaches to the GDP formula.


#1 Expenditure Approach
The most commonly used GDP formula, which is based on the money spent by various groups that participate in the economy.

GDP = C + G + I + NX

C = consumption or all private consumer spending within a country’s economy, including, durable goods (items with a lifespan greater than three years), non-durable goods (food & clothing), and services.

G = total government expenditures, including, salaries of government employees, road construction/repair, public schools, and military machines.

I = sum of a country’s investments spent on capital equipment, inventories, and housing.

NX = net exports or a country’s total exports less total imports.



#2 Income Approach
This GDP formula takes the total income generated by the goods and services produced.

GDP = Total National Income + Sales Taxes + Depreciation + Net Foreign Factor Income

Total National Income – the sum of all wages, rent, interest, and profits.

Sales Taxes – consumer tax imposed by the government on the sales of goods and services.

Depreciation – cost allocated to a tangible asset over its useful life.

Net Foreign Factor Income – the difference between the total income that a country’s citizens and companies generate in foreign countries, versus the total income foreign citizens and companies generate in that country.



#3 Production or Value-Added Approach
The sum of the value added to a product during the production process. To determine the value added between businesses, the price at which the product is sold by the seller is deducted from the price it was bought for from the supplier.

GDP PER CAPITA

A country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per person is obtained by dividing its GDP for a particular period by its average population for the year.

There are other adjustments of GDP you can do, but ALL GDP FIGURES ARE BASED ON THE FORMULA FOR CALCULATING GDP

AS YOU CAN SEE, THE WORLD BANK HAS A BETTER METHOD FOR CALCULATING COUNTRY WEALTH, AS DESCRIBED IN THE ORIGINAL ARTICLE.
So why isn't it as commonly used as gdp per capita or hdI? Also this "measure" is nothing new. it has been around for a while but still is not used as much.

And you forgot about GDP per capita ppp, the best measure of standard of living that considers COL.
 
.
And you forgot about GDP per capita ppp, the best measure of standard of living that considers COL.

There are other adjustments of GDP you can do, but ALL GDP FIGURES ARE BASED ON THE FORMULA FOR CALCULATING GDP

e.g GDP per capita PPP

The point is it makes no difference what GDP you quote, because the now we don't value wealth on any form of GDP, but other factors too, as described in the original article.
 
.
There are other adjustments of GDP you can do, but ALL GDP FIGURES ARE BASED ON THE FORMULA FOR CALCULATING GDP

e.g GDP per capita PPP

The point is it makes no difference what GDP you quote, because the now we don't value wealth on any form of GDP, but other factors too, as described in the original article.
you may not care about gdp per capita nominal and ppp, but most economists do. for all its problems, it is still an effective way to measure income, and in turn wealth. especially ppp.
 
.
.
Just Google 'why gdp is bad measure'
except i am only talking about gdp per capita. And yes i knoe it has problems, but it is still one of the more effective measures in particular ppp. And i am not only using gdp per capita data, but hdi data, which eas literally created by the un to measure development, or "wealth" as you call it. You still haven't disproven the majority of measurements that show average indians are wealthier than average pakistanis. Mayne not by much, but still wealthier.
 
.
https://qz.com/1250127/barclays-is-...eful-measure-of-economic-growth-and-progress/

except i am only talking about gdp per capita. And yes i knoe it has problems, but it is still one of the more effective measures in particular ppp. And i am not only using gdp per capita data, but hdi data, which eas literally created by the un to measure development, or "wealth" as you call it. You still haven't disproven the majority of measurements that show average indians are wealthier than average pakistanis. Mayne not by much, but still wealthier.

Just read the articles. If you have any comments after that let me know

https://raywilliams.ca/gdp-not-good-measure-progress/

https://hbr.org/2016/07/gdp-is-a-wildly-flawed-measure-for-the-digital-age
 
.
.
except i am only talking about gdp per capita.

GDP PER CAPITA IS BASED ON GDP

most of your articles show that the problems with gdp per capita are that it does not take into account damage to the environment or sone categories that measure standard of living(such as life expectancy) That is why i also used hdi data, which includes ehat gdp per capita misses

Stop arguing for the sake of it. What a preposterous proposition.
 
.
and i agree gdp is flawed. But its flaws are that it does not measure some aspects of standard of living, which is where hdi comes in. With that being said, there is a correlation between hdi and gdp per capita.
 
.
and i agree gdp is flawed. But its flaws are that it does not measure some aspects of standard of living, which is where hdi comes in. With that being said, there is a correlation between hdi and gdp per capita.

Whats wrong with HDI?

Five observations are quite pertinent about the HDI:

  • First, the HDI is not a comprehensive measure of human development. It just focuses on the basic dimensions of human development and does not take into account a number of other important dimensions of human development.
  • Second, it is composed of long-term human development outcomes. Thus it does not reflect the input efforts in terms of policies nor can it measure short-term human development achievements.
  • Third, it shares all the limitations of composite measures. But it is important to keep it simple with minimum variables to ensure its acceptability, understanding and predictability.
  • Fourth, the HDI is an average measure and thus masks a series of disparities and inequalities within countries. Disaggregation of the HDI in terms of gender, regions, races and ethnic groups can unmask the HDI and can be and has been used widely for policy formulation.
  • Fifth, income enters into the HDI not in its own right, but as a proxy for resources needed to have a decent standard of living. The issue with regard to income is how it is transformed into the health and education dimensions of the HDI. Thus between income and the other two dimensions of the HDI, the issue is that of transformation, and not of substitution.
SOURCE OFFICIAL UN HDI WEBSITE
http://hdr.undp.org/en/hdi-what-it-is
 
.
GDP PER CAPITA IS BASED ON GDP



Stop arguing for the sake of it. What a preposterous proposition.
you still haven't disproven my arguements. And it is a fact that for all its problems, gdp per capita and gdp per capita ppp are still the most comonly used measures of wealth. The UN HDI is used to measure wahr gdp rankings fail to record. Those lists are how global economists measure wealth and syandard of living. period.

And we are not even talking about some of the more specific measures of development. you want to think pakistanis are wealthier than india when pakistan has a shorter life expectancy, higher infant and maternal mortality, and ranks lower on food security? The fact you claimed nigeria, the country with the highest pop below poverty shows the flaws of your measurements.
 
.
Richest 10% of Indians own over 3/4th of wealth in India
While wealth has been rising in India, not everyone has shared in this growth. There is still considerable wealth poverty, says Credit Suisse’s India wealth report
Last Published: Tue, Oct 23 2018. 06 27 AM IST

g-capacc-kEyB--621x414@LiveMint.jpg

The richest 10% of Indians own 77.4% of the country’s wealth, says Credit Suisse in their 2018 Global Wealth Report. The bottom 60%, the majority of the population, own 4.7%. The richest 1% own 51.5% (chart 1 above). And it’s not some bleeding-heart NGO that’s arrived at these figures, but a blue-blooded Swiss bank.

Such a high level of disparity raises several questions, not the least of which is the extent to which it subverts democracy. While everybody talks about development these days, a legitimate question from the Credit Suisse data is: whose development are we talking about? Is it development for the top 1%, or for the top 10%, or the poorest 60%?



The cornering of the fruits of development by the wealthy and the stark disparity in wealth shares provide fuel for social unrest and rising crime. It increases disaffection and threatens to tear apart the fabric of the nation—it puts enormous strain on nation-building if the share of the majority in the nation’s wealth is less than 5%.

https://www.livemint.com/Money/iH2a...Indians-own-over-34th-of-wealth-in-India.html

Off topic, Please start a new thread to discuss wealth inequality in India.
 
.
Richest 10% of Indians own over 3/4th of wealth in India
While wealth has been rising in India, not everyone has shared in this growth. There is still considerable wealth poverty, says Credit Suisse’s India wealth report
Last Published: Tue, Oct 23 2018. 06 27 AM IST

g-capacc-kEyB--621x414@LiveMint.jpg

The richest 10% of Indians own 77.4% of the country’s wealth, says Credit Suisse in their 2018 Global Wealth Report. The bottom 60%, the majority of the population, own 4.7%. The richest 1% own 51.5% (chart 1 above). And it’s not some bleeding-heart NGO that’s arrived at these figures, but a blue-blooded Swiss bank.

Such a high level of disparity raises several questions, not the least of which is the extent to which it subverts democracy. While everybody talks about development these days, a legitimate question from the Credit Suisse data is: whose development are we talking about? Is it development for the top 1%, or for the top 10%, or the poorest 60%?



The cornering of the fruits of development by the wealthy and the stark disparity in wealth shares provide fuel for social unrest and rising crime. It increases disaffection and threatens to tear apart the fabric of the nation—it puts enormous strain on nation-building if the share of the majority in the nation’s wealth is less than 5%.

https://www.livemint.com/Money/iH2a...Indians-own-over-34th-of-wealth-in-India.html
 
.
Whats wrong with HDI?

Five observations are quite pertinent about the HDI:

  • First, the HDI is not a comprehensive measure of human development. It just focuses on the basic dimensions of human development and does not take into account a number of other important dimensions of human development.
  • Second, it is composed of long-term human development outcomes. Thus it does not reflect the input efforts in terms of policies nor can it measure short-term human development achievements.
  • Third, it shares all the limitations of composite measures. But it is important to keep it simple with minimum variables to ensure its acceptability, understanding and predictability.
  • Fourth, the HDI is an average measure and thus masks a series of disparities and inequalities within countries. Disaggregation of the HDI in terms of gender, regions, races and ethnic groups can unmask the HDI and can be and has been used widely for policy formulation.
  • Fifth, income enters into the HDI not in its own right, but as a proxy for resources needed to have a decent standard of living. The issue with regard to income is how it is transformed into the health and education dimensions of the HDI. Thus between income and the other two dimensions of the HDI, the issue is that of transformation, and not of substitution.
SOURCE OFFICIAL UN HDI WEBSITE
http://hdr.undp.org/en/hdi-what-it-is
of ourse the hdi has its limits. but no other meslasure tskes into account all the categories hdi does.

But then agan there are plentynof limits to the median wealth listings
 
.
Off topic, Please start a new thread to discuss wealth inequality in India.
Don't act like moderator ..we are talking about wealth of countries and its important to know how its being distributed ..You could be wealthy nation overall but still could have majority population who are starving
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom