Why Modi’s changed approach to Pakistan is more likely to yield détente

[pursuit of happiness]

You are a copy cat only



Hahaha...Dawn took down the link suddenly mr. literate
Keep going, am off.

--
Truth does not need copies ..
flaese have serval version like you provided..
--
elders also teache us.. even mirrior give you opposite picture so use head ...

 

[notsuperstitious]

Hahaha...Dawn took down the link suddenly mr. literate
Keep going, am off.

Einstine, the link still shows on google search. If you have any understanding of how google (or anything other than flying angels) works, then you would not have made a fool of yourself yet again.

And of course you should be off, when kashmiris on pakistan side openly protest about pakistan pushing across militants, there's no rebuttal you are left with...

 

[Green Arrow]

At the end of the day, both countries have to sit for a dialogue. No matter what

 

[1971+]

Who accepted? Assumptions and speculations are hallmarks of Indian extremists, we know that. Am out of time only, you guys troll however you like, as always.

Hey buddy , don't get personal. Did I call you extremist or anything else ?? I don't carry gun , neither do I know how to make bombs and neither do I want to blow up myself to meet 72 houirs.

Neither I am delusional . I asked you to rebutt any of my points but what you did was to get personal and that's the sign of Troll. It's you who is trolling without any substance or rebuttals.

 

[Gunsnroses]

Hey buddy , don't get personal. Did I call you extremist or anything else ?? ............

Ok, sorry for that.

Einstine, the link still shows on google search. If you have any understanding of how google (or anything other than flying angels) works, then you would not have made a fool of yourself yet again.

And of course you should be off, when kashmiris on pakistan side openly protest about pakistan pushing across militants, there's no rebuttal you are left with...

Was it me who making a point? Shall I teach you the etiquettes of reasoning? Try harder next time cowboy before preaching how to google and .

 

[notsuperstitious]

Was it me who making a point? Shall I teach you the etiquettes of reasoning? Try harder next time cowboy before preaching how to google and .

There are other links for someone interested in a reasonable debate. Yoy trying to make this about ONE recently defunct link that still shows on google tells me exactly who is wanting in the etiquettes of reasoning and running away when out of arguments.

My argument stands, the protests by kashmiris on pakistan side clearly shows that pakistan is responsible for ceasefire violations over the years and not India just because we have now decided to retaliate.

 

[Kinetic]

At the end of the day, both countries have to sit for a dialogue. No matter what

But you have to stop cross border terrorism first. Otherwise no talk... just see.

Killing people and talking.... don't expect anything. We are OK with what is going on, we can go with it for next 50 years, but can you?

 

[notsuperstitious]

But you have to stop cross border terrorism first. Otherwise no talk... just see.

Killing people and talking.... don't expect anything. We are OK with what is going on, we can go with it for next 50 years, but can you?

Actually more than the terrorism, the real issue with talks is what is pakistan bringing to the table? Most pakistanis seem to think talks means India will hand over surrender documents and shake hands and leave...

Pakistan does not want to compromise as killing this issue is not in the interest of some powerful institutions in pakistan, whereas India benefits if the issue gets resolved, or if does not, even then India suffers far less than Pakistan.. yet India is willing to compromise. The ball is in Pakistan's court.

 

[Bang Galore]

Not many seemed to have looked at who the author was. Jay Panda is an well respected opposition member of Parliament belonging to the BJD, not from the ruling party. That should be an eye opener about what many members of Parliament think about the current situation. Important because many in Pakistan seem to be pushing the line that this is just Modi's (& the BJP's) doing and that other senior figures in India are not of the same opinion.

 

[Kinetic]

Actually more than the terrorism, the real issue with talks is what is pakistan bringing to the table? Most pakistanis seem to think talks means India will hand over surrender documents and shake hands and leave...

Pakistan does not want to compromise as killing this issue is not in the interest of some powerful institutions in pakistan, whereas India benefits if the issue gets resolved, or if does not, even then India suffers far less than Pakistan.. yet India is willing to compromise. The ball is in Pakistan's court.

If you understand this, u must this as well that Pakistan can't bring anything to table to negotiate. Not in foreseeable future. U know the situation in pakistan.

So its either status q or India takes steps.

 

[Areesh]

Radical Indians these days

Brilliant post. Summed up the whole delusional grandeur of BJP and Modi fans on this forum.

 

[Areesh]

Not many seemed to have looked at who the author was. Jay Panda is an well respected opposition member of Parliament belonging to the BJD, not from the ruling party. That should be an eye opener about what many members of Parliament think about the current situation. Important because many in Pakistan seem to be pushing the line that this is just Modi's (& the BJP's) doing and that other senior figures in India are not of the same opinion.

Doesn't matter to us if he is from BJP or BJD. Extremism is on a rise in your country so leaders from other parties would act and play according to the public mode despite how unrealistic and delusional it is.

They are politicians after all. Even if they know Indian public is delusional they won't wake them up unless sh!t hits the fan.

 

[ito]

So much that you 'know' already. Do you know why India is not interested in a solution to Kashmir dispute?

Now tell me why should India be interested in a solution to Kashmir?

 

[SrNair]

It's India's "Israel envy" or "US envy" which keeps popping up.

The reality which these bloggers don't understand is that Israel and US can deliver disproportionate response only because their adversary can't ratchet up the stakes in response.

They kill 1, you kill 10, problem solved.
Except: if the adversary applies the same rule and kills 100 in return.

Pakistan has acted mature and downplayed Modi's assertiveness because Pakistan understands that Modi is gong through the macho phase of his courtship of the Indian public, where he needs to puff up his chest and strut his stuff. This benevolence on Pakistan's part won't be extended indefinitely. If Modi continues to act like an irresponsibe juvenile, he will receive a hard lesson in growing up fast.

No .He is making one of best geopolitical move.He orderd his army for a befitted response after stocking necessry strategic back up plan.

 

[ito]

Doesn't matter to us if he is from BJP or BJD. Extremism is on a rise in your country so leaders from other parties would act and play according to the public mode despite how unrealistic and delusional it is.

They are politicians after all. Even if they know Indian public is delusional they won't wake them up unless sh!t hits the fan.[/quote

what is delusional about india's reaction. india is much more powerful than pak and that is the reality