Why Japan's formidable navy is considered the best in Asia

[Suika]

DF-21 has very precise strike rate and Chinese will not be kind to fire one DF-21 for one Japan or US warship. SM-3 has yet to demonstrate capable of taking multiple ballistic missile attack couple with decoy deployed. This is fact. American war exercise is not realistic enough and is more for domestic consumption only... It don't work in real life.

Is there an example of DF-21D hitting a ship? All I recall is it hitting sand in the desert or splashing water in the South China Sea.

SM-3 Block2A has successfully tested against the sort of BMs expected from DPRK without 100% hit rate. It's limited use is noted within US and Japan as well. But its still a capability held by no other. SM-3 Block 2A will test against ICBM class later this year it seems.

Oh, I forgot to add the ego, smirk, boastful syntax. Here it is below:

 

[Beast]

Is there an example of DF-21D hitting a ship? All I recall is it hitting sand in the desert or splashing water in the South China Sea.

SM-3 Block2A has successfully tested against the sort of BMs expected from DPRK without 100% hit rate. It's limited use is noted within US and Japan as well. But its still a capability held by no other. SM-3 Block 2A will test against ICBM class later this year it seems.

Oh, I forgot to add the ego, smirk, boastful syntax. Here it is below:

Yes, DF-21 never hit a ship and is fake(I guess it makes u sleep soundly) but that doesn't take away fact SM-3 never demonstrated taking on multiple ballistic missile with even accuracy to mention....
Care to share any info u know to have conducted against multiple interception?

 

[Daniel808]

I'm not trying to groundlessley knock on the Type 55 so as to win impression points.

The problem when there are so many trolls on a forums is that even if some posters are sincerely not trolling, they are still assumed to be trolling.

Disinformation and misinformation for different reasons happens. Need more to get to the bottom of it. Even Pro-China posters repeat that about PRC weapon development quite a bit over at sinodefenseforums.

Grabbing the meaning of GaN in Chinese, 氮化镓, with Type 55 destroyer, or 55型驱逐舰, and several articles come up saying that the Type 346B uses the latest GaN. These two are May 2019 and March 2020. So if they are just echoing the reference to the 2017 statement, then its a bit of false information still going around. But if its its based on more official statements, then it seems to have it. Well after all, GaN is very heavy and energy thirsty so the big size of the Type 55 may help support the systems that enable the use of GaN in large arrays.
https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/64715764
https://mil.news.sina.com.cn/jssd/2020-03-22/doc-iimxxsth1019553.shtml

Its reported also in Science daily newspaper, which is kinda official news from the Radar Contractor.

Anyway, Navy recognition is one of the credible and objective media.
More importantly they are not biased like national interest typical fanboy media

Relax don't worry too much, with 4x QC-280 Gas Turbine (150,000 shp). Type 055 Cruiser is one of the most powerful warship in this world.
Even Zumwalt only have 105,000 shp

 

[Suika]

Yes, DF-21 never hit a ship and is fake(I guess it makes u sleep soundly) but that doesn't take away fact SM-3 never demonstrated taking on multiple ballistic missile with even accuracy to mention....
Care to share any info u know to have conducted against multiple interception?

Reframing the the parameters to beyond the design purpose and test made so far by SM-3 Block2A to only set up an implied disappointment position is a troll trick. I acknowledged the limited role of the interceptor missile. But again, it is still a capability that no other has.

 

[Beast]

Reframing the the parameters to beyond the design purpose and test made so far by SM-3 Block2A to only set up an implied disappointment position is a troll trick. I acknowledged the limited role of the interceptor missile. But again, it is still a capability that no other has.

Troll trick? It's legiment question. We are talking about real war or you think US/Japan has some gentleman agreement with China that only one DF-21D is allowed to fire at one ship only?

 

[Suika]

Troll trick? It's legiment question. We are talking about real war or you think US/Japan has some gentleman agreement with China that only one DF-21D is allowed to fire at one ship only?

I addressed the point already.

"SM-3 Block2A has successfully tested against the sort of BMs expected from DPRK without 100% hit rate. It's limited use is noted within US and Japan as well. But its still a capability held by no other. SM-3 Block 2A will test against ICBM class later this year it seems."

But if you want to raise nuke threat on Japan, then Japan should make 1,000 nukes.

Its reported also in Science daily newspaper, which is kinda official news from the Radar Contractor.

Anyway, Navy recognition is one of the credible and objective media.
More importantly they are not biased like national interest typical fanboy media

Relax don't worry too much, with 4x QC-280 Gas Turbine (150,000 shp). Type 055 Cruiser is one of the most powerful warship in this world.
Even Zumwalt only have 105,000 shp

That surely is a lot of horsepower.

Although Zumwalt uses Integrated electric propulsion which vibrates less and has better fuel economy while Type 55 uses common COGAG. Atago-class also uses COGAG but the Maya-class uses COGLAG for better fuel economy.

 

[ZY-CN-CA]

F-35B is a killer, we know