What's new

Why is America turning Islamophobic?

You should hold your breath for Bannon. Hes calling the shots but sadly for him, state responsibilities are something that is reserved for proper leaders within the U.S, not edgy radio hosts.

Mr. Bannon is well qualified for the job. He has a Graduate degree in Foreign Service, MBA from Harvard, served US Navy and worked for Goldman Sachs.
 
.
Mr. Bannon is well qualified for the job. He has a Graduate degree in Foreign Service, MBA from Harvard, served US Navy and worked for Goldman Sachs.
I'm sure he is. Lets see how long a sick mind like his stays in the white house.
 
. .
:lol:Why not talk straight? Are you talking about Saif Ali Khan? He was targeted by some internet trolls.
That was settled, I guess. And the child's name is still Timur.
What banning are you talking about?
What was settled? The fact he fears for his son's safety and is thinking about changing his name.
What kind of people target new born babies for their hate.:tdown:
 
.
It is about loyalty.
What is the natural loyalty of a US Muslim, when there is a conflict between
a US Christian and a foreign Muslim?

A conflict between an American Christian and an American Muslim? What does that have to do with loyalty to the United States? I think you meant something different.

Once You put citizenship above religion, you are done.
As long as You put religion over citizenship You are going to see rejection,
and it is You, that create that split.

(not ignoring the existence of prejudice)

How do you define putting religion over citizenship? This is the United States, where you can practice any religion you wish, while at the same time you have the right to peaceably assemble and petition the government for a redress of grievances. Isn't that exactly what was happening in this case? Or are you suggesting that because they are Muslim Americans, that right doesn't belong to them?

This has nothing to do with loyalty or lack of it because of religious affiliation.

What is it that you see that makes you believe it is disloyal to encourage unity in a community and connect with its own religion? How could that possibly be a wrong thing? The Untied States is the ultimate melting pot, where there is the most diverse communities who are allowed this inalienable right. They create programs to help each other, help people who have no outside assistance. Communities that advocate helping each other in times of need, communities that look out for their own people to help those who might need help. In Muslim communities there are assistance programs to help those who can't afford emergency health care, who have an ill person in the family who's family needs help until he gets better, or even raise funds so they can make the pilgrimage to Mecca. Assistance for Muslim refugees around the world. Syrian refugees, Palestinians etc. Assistance to help with burials if someone has passed away and they can't afford it, etc. This is not something you see just in Muslim communities. It happens with all sorts of Christian denominations through their churches throughout the entire country. It happens within communities of certain nationalities, like Brazilians, many other South Americans, Vietnamese, Chinese, Indians/Hindus and the list goes on.

Jewish communities are quite actively dominant in that regard, and they suffer considerable prejudices as well.

All these communities experience some form of prejudice or another and speak out because of it. So why are we especially singling out Muslim communities in this case?
 
. .
Force people not to remain fasts, banning scarves, names, limited mosques, not allowed to have more kids, having them strictly state monitered? I have been saying Indian communists must learn this from their chinese counterparts which they never do sadly. Even Indian atheists must learn from Chinese counterparts.



Not banned. The kids name is still Taimur.
First of all I never mentioned any indian atheists why mention them here?
Second Most of the things you read and said aren't true and fabricated. Let's ask some Chinese citizens
@Chinese-Dragon @ChineseTiger1986 I know about 1 child policy but the rest? Please clear this confusion.

Yes he whispered that in your ears . Ek ek ek pagal hai is forum pe .
Saif Ali Khan: I wrote a note changing Taimur's name
I might change Taimur's name: Saif Ali Khan | bollywood | Hindustan
Saif reveals more on son Taimur's name controversy

Actually the pagal comes from indian side not ours.




Just not the Modi style of nationalism where people are killed for eating cow meat. If that is called nationalism you need to see a shrink very fast.



White boy thinks Trump will save his angry and sorry a$$. LOL we are already seeing the results and they speak for themselves. Trump isolating America and owned by Putin. LOL at America first.
"Muslims should put their citizenship over Religion" but westboro church goers can put their religion over anything and even get away with celebrating deaths of American troops.
 
.
First of all I never mentioned any indian atheists why mention them here?
Second Most of the things you read and said aren't true and fabricated. Let's ask some Chinese citizens
@Chinese-Dragon @ChineseTiger1986 I know about 1 child policy but the rest? Please clear this confusion.


Saif Ali Khan: I wrote a note changing Taimur's name
I might change Taimur's name: Saif Ali Khan | bollywood | Hindustan
Saif reveals more on son Taimur's name controversy

Actually the pagal comes from indian side not ours.





"Muslims should put their citizenship over Religion" but westboro church goers can put their religion over anything and even get away with celebrating deaths of American troops.

The other issues were discussed to death in pdf sirji regarding to issues in Xinjiang.
 
.
A conflict between an American Christian and an American Muslim? What does that have to do with loyalty to the United States? I think you meant something different.



How do you define putting religion over citizenship? This is the United States, where you can practice any religion you wish, while at the same time you have the right to peaceably assemble and petition the government for a redress of grievances. Isn't that exactly what was happening in this case? Or are you suggesting that because they are Muslim Americans, that right doesn't belong to them?

This has nothing to do with loyalty or lack of it because of religious affiliation.

What is it that you see that makes you believe it is disloyal to encourage unity in a community and connect with its own religion? How could that possibly be a wrong thing? The Untied States is the ultimate melting pot, where there is the most diverse communities who are allowed this inalienable right. They create programs to help each other, help people who have no outside assistance. Communities that advocate helping each other in times of need, communities that look out for their own people to help those who might need help. In Muslim communities there are assistance programs to help those who can't afford emergency health care, who have an ill person in the family who's family needs help until he gets better, or even raise funds so they can make the pilgrimage to Mecca. Assistance for Muslim refugees around the world. Syrian refugees, Palestinians etc. Assistance to help with burials if someone has passed away and they can't afford it, etc. This is not something you see just in Muslim communities. It happens with all sorts of Christian denominations through their churches throughout the entire country. It happens within communities of certain nationalities, like Brazilians, many other South Americans, Vietnamese, Chinese, Indians/Hindus and the list goes on.

Jewish communities are quite actively dominant in that regard, and they suffer considerable prejudices as well.

All these communities experience some form of prejudice or another and speak out because of it. So why are we especially singling out Muslim communities in this case?

This is not about dissent but disloyalty

This is not about freedom of expression but about committing treason

This is not about freedom to practice a religion but to enforce their religious beliefs on others

This is not about humanitarian mission but supporting terrorists

This is not about protecting cultures but hating other cultures
 
.
This is not about dissent but disloyalty

This is not about freedom of expression but about committing treason

This is not about freedom to practice a religion but to enforce their religious beliefs on others

This is not about humanitarian mission but supporting terrorists

This is not about protecting cultures but hating other cultures

What are you talking about?
 
.
The other issues were discussed to death in pdf sirji regarding to issues in Xinjiang.
I made a comparison between two different types of atheists which has some correlation with the topic but I can't seem to figure why it triggered a angry indian reaction. When did I invoke india or it's atheists?
 
.
Yes he whispered that in your ears . Ek ek ek pagal hai is forum pe .

rs-234401-american-psycho.jpg
 
.
A conflict between an American Christian and an American Muslim? What does that have to do with loyalty to the United States? I think you meant something different.
I said a conflict between a US Christian and a foreign Muslim, not a US Muslim.
Example: Heavyweight boxing finals in the Olympics.
Who do You want to win as a US Muslim?
The American Christian boxer, or the Moroccan Muslim boxer?

What makes You more pissed off?
The Boston Bomber blowing up innocent civilians (war crime) or
US Marine firing an ATGM at an active ISIS sniper in a building,
which later turns out to kill two hidden innocent children held as hostages (not a war crime).

I gave a generic answer to a question, and have no opinion on the specific group mentioned.

You have no right to judge how he interacts with Dutch society, keep your BS to yourself white boy
This is a forum, and I have seen a lot of his comments that show where his loyalties are.
They are very far from what You would expect from a Dutch citizen,
and I am convinced, he would be considered an extremist by the average Dutch citizen.
 
.
Islamophobia is not limited to America alone..It is gaining ground across the globe, and Muslim community it itself to blame for this.
 
.
First of all I never mentioned any indian atheists why mention them here?
Second Most of the things you read and said aren't true and fabricated. Let's ask some Chinese citizens
@Chinese-Dragon @ChineseTiger1986 I know about 1 child policy but the rest? Please clear this confusion.

The one child policy only applied to Han Chinese citizens. Even the separatist like Rebiya were only to give more than dozen kids. You can't find any government more tolerant than the Chinese government.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom