What's new

Why India is witnessing spike in attacks on Christians, churches

beijingwalker

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
65,195
Reaction score
-55
Country
China
Location
China
Why India is witnessing spike in attacks on Christians, churches
Rights groups record more than 300 attacks on Christians and their religious places in the first nine months of this year.

RSSBengalIndia.jpg

Volunteers of far-right Hindu group, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), march during a training session at Tatiberia village in West Bengal state, India [File: Rupak De Chowdhuri/Reuters]

2 Dec 2021

New Delhi/Roorkee, India – In late October, India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi met and invited Pope Francis to India, the country with the second-largest Christian population in Asia.
However, in a speech about two weeks earlier, Mohan Bhagwat, head of the far-right Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), the ideological mentor of Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), warned Hindus about religious conversions and alleged “demographic changes” in India’s northeastern states, which have a large Christian population.

In his annual speech on October 14 to mark the Hindu festival of Dussehra (also known as Durga Puja), Bhagwat said: “Rising population and demographic imbalance need to be addressed and population policy is to be redesigned. And that policy should be applicable to all irrespective of caste and creed. Illegal immigration in bordering districts and conversions in [the] northeast have changed the demographics further.”

The RSS aims to create an ethnic Hindu state out of India. As the head of Sangh Parivar, the umbrella group of Hindu nationalist organisations including the BJP, Bhagwat’s Dussehra speech is considered an agenda-setter for the year.

Rise in attacks on Christians across India
As things later unfolded, Bhagwat’s speech was supplemented with violent attacks on Christians and churches in different parts of India, with mobs making open calls to “behead” them and stop alleged conversions of Hindus.

Three days after the speech, Rameshwar Sharma, a BJP legislator in Madhya Pradesh, called for a “Chadar Mukt, Father Mukt Bharat” (an India free of veil-wearing Muslims and Christian priests) while addressing a crowd.

On Sunday, in southern Karnataka’s Belur town, alleged members of Bajrang Dal, a far-right Hindu group behind numerous attacks on minorities, disrupted a Christian prayer meeting, accusing the community of conversion.

On the same day in New Delhi, a warehouse turned into a church was allegedly vandalised and Sunday mass was disrupted by the same group, whose members were seen shouting “shoot the traitors” in a video accessed by Al Jazeera.


On October 3, a mob of nearly 250 Hindu vigilantes armed with iron rods ransacked a church in Roorkee in the northern state of Uttarakhand, which is governed by the BJP. Witnesses told Al Jazeera only about a dozen people were in the church when the attack occurred.

Pearl Lance, the daughter of the church’s pastor, was allegedly molested by men, abused and attacked by women, and her phone snatched. Rajat Kumar, a staff member at the church, was hit with iron rods multiple times on his head, resulting in serious injuries.

“They dragged me by my neck to the ground floor while raining blows on my face and back. I became unconscious after I was hit with a rod on my head,” Kumar told Al Jazeera, his right eye badly bruised and swollen.

Eva Lance, the pastor’s elder daughter, said the family had reported suspicious activity to the police at least four times before the attack. “We received hateful anti-Christian threats by unknown men who followed us before the attack. They accused us of conversion and threatened violence. I had sent an email, visited the police station, and registered a formal complaint on October 2,” she told Al Jazeera.

She also alleged a late police response when the attack happened. “We were assured of security by the police but no help came. Even on the day of the attack, we kept calling the police but they only came an hour after the mob had done the damage,” she added.

Police even filed a report against the pastor’s family, alleging forced conversions, promoting religious disharmony, criminal conspiracy, and even robbery.

Chhattisgarh ‘new laboratory’ for anti-Christian hatred
According to a report by human rights groups in October, more than 300 attacks on Christians took place in the first nine months of this year, including at least 32 in Karnataka.

The report found that of the total 305 incidents of anti-Christian violence, four north Indian states registered as many as 169 of them: 66 in BJP-ruled Uttar Pradesh, 47 in Congress-ruled Chhattisgarh, 30 in tribal-dominated Jharkhand, and 30 in BJP-ruled Madhya Pradesh.

At least nine Indian states have planned anti-conversion laws, including Chhattisgarh, which, activists say, has emerged as a “new laboratory” for anti-Christian hatred in India.

On October 1, more than 1,000 people gathered in the Surguja district of Chhattisgarh for a “Band Karo Dharmantran” (Stop Religious Conversions) rally – one in a series of events organised in the garb of anti-conversion protests in the central Indian state.

Addressing the gathering, Parmatmanand Maharaj, a far-right Hindu leader, urged the people to “arm themselves with axes to teach Christians indulging in conversions a lesson”.

“Why do you keep an axe? Behead them,” he said, asking the crowd to follow a “Roko, toko, thoko” (Stop, warn and kill) dictum against the Christians.

Among his audience were BJP Parliamentarian Ramvichar Netam, former BJP Parliamentarian Nand Kumar Sai and Chhattisgarh state BJP spokesman Anurag Singh Deo.

Muslims barred from public prayer sites in Indian city

Sushil Shukla, head of the communication department of the Congress party, which governs the state, accused the BJP of “running out of issues” and “stoking religious hatred”. He said the government will act against the organisers of the Surguja rally after an investigation.

T R Koshima, superintendent of police at Surguja, told Al Jazeera they are investigating the matter but no first information report (FIR) – a document prepared by police when they receive information about a cognisable offence – related to the rally has yet been filed.

“Though the investigation is ongoing, how much of the speech could be considered instigating since no violence took place thereafter in the district is to be seen,” he said.

However, it was not an isolated incident in Chhattisgarh in recent months.


On September 5, a Christian pastor was summoned by the police for questioning after complaints from right-wing outfits in the state’s capital of Raipur. Once he reached the police station, he was also allegedly assaulted by the same groups.

In the same month, a video clip of a woman – who runs a Hindu right-wing outfit – beating up a pastor in the presence of police constables in the Bhilai district went viral.

Jyoti Sharma, the woman accused of attacking the pastor, told Al Jazeera she did not do anything wrong. Though she accepted that an FIR has been filed against her, she called it an “intimidating tactic” and said it will not deter her from “doing ‘kutai’ and ‘thukai'” (attacking and assaulting).

In July this year, Sunil Sharma, superintendent of police in Chhattisgarh’s Sukma district, issued a circular asking his subordinates to increase surveillance over the “activities” of the Christian missionaries.

In Karnataka as well, a BJP-ruled state, attacks on Christians have escalated in recent years, according to William Michaels, president of the United Christian Front.

The government recently ordered a “survey” of churches in the state to check “forced conversions” and deployed intelligence officers to gather more information on them.

In October, a right-wing mob stormed a makeshift church in Hubballi and sang “bhajans” (Hindu prayer songs) in what they said was a protest against alleged conversions.

Several pastors and Christians in Belagavi said they have been given “friendly warnings” by the police against going to the church for prayers until the state assembly session begins in mid-December. In the session, an anti-conversion bill is likely to be proposed by the BJP.


‘It’s Christians after Muslims’
Dharamlal Kaushik, BJP legislator and leader of the opposition in the Chhattisgarh assembly, told Al Jazeera his party “is not against any community but the Congress must stop vote-bank politics” – a reference to minority communities presumably acting as captive voters in India.

When asked about increasing attacks and hate speech against Christians, Kaushik instead questioned the Congress on “its silence on the issue of conversion” and blamed the opposition party for the alleged increase in “conversions of Hindus into Christianity”.

“In the recent past, the right-wing Hindu nationalist forces have intensified their attacks against the Christians,” a Christian rights activist who documents hate crimes against the community told Al Jazeera, on condition of anonymity.

“We can’t unsee the large mobilisations in Chhattisgarh, the attack on the church in Roorkee, the police order in Sukma, the ‘survey’ of churches in Karnataka, and Mohan Bhagwat’s talk on conversion as isolated events. Simply put, it’s Christians after Muslims. Not that these attacks are new but they want them to be more visible public spectacles.”

Apoorvanand, who teaches Hindi literature at Delhi University and regularly writes against religious violence in India, said the “normalisation of anti-Christian violence is deeply troubling”.

“This doesn’t get reported as much as it should be,” he said.

“By choosing a different target (apart from Muslims) for a supposedly different crime, the ‘Hindutva’ (Hindu supremacist) project in India is adding diversity and objectivity to its anti-minority hatred. To the followers, this makes anti-minority hate and vigilante justice look rational and more natural.”


 
Sooner or later they would come for Christians and Sikhs as well, right now they are just after those chicken Indian Muslims.
 
There should not be any space for any religion in india that claims ownership of heaven and god.
This world should get itself rid of religions which divide people on the basis believers and non believers ( based on some fairy tales).
Three religions which originated from around the same area have been the source of all the violence ,ignorance and bloodshed in the world for centuries.
These religions are nothing but political ideologies in the guise of religions that are out to conquer the world...such barbaric cults must not have any place in a civilised world.
 
There should not be any space for any religion in india that claims ownership of heaven and god.
This world should get itself rid of religions which divide people on the basis believers and non believers ( based on some fairy tales).
Three religions which originated from around the same area have been the source of all the violence ,ignorance and bloodshed in the world for centuries.
These religions are nothing but political ideologies in the guise of religions that are out to conquer the world...such barbaric cults must not have any place in a civilised world.
So says a fascist hindutva racist on this forum. A pagan religion whose supposedly peaceful followers, as witnessed in the videos, will do anything to go live in the countries dominated by those same three religions that the fascist hindus despise the most.
 
But Indian minister claims India is the world most secular country...
 
Sooner or later they would come for Christians and Sikhs as well, right now they are just after those chicken Indian Muslims.
Is the Christian in the video chicken too? If a religious minority is chicken, what are Muslims states with large militaries, embassies and diplomats.
 
There should not be any space for any religion in india that claims ownership of heaven and god.
This world should get itself rid of religions which divide people on the basis believers and non believers ( based on some fairy tales).
Three religions which originated from around the same area have been the source of all the violence ,ignorance and bloodshed in the world for centuries.
These religions are nothing but political ideologies in the guise of religions that are out to conquer the world...such barbaric cults must not have any place in a civilised world.
The oldest Monotheist religious text is Rig Veda. You are not a believer in God though.

You forget Hindus are lynching people in the name of religion. Buddhists are murdering and raping in Myanmar in the name of religion. They have literally committed ethnic cleansing and a genocide.

God and heaven are words in every major language, hence God was not invented by religion. However, you cannot explain your religion because there is nothing to explain in idolatry which is like a cult-ure. That is why you get frustrated and angry.

Idolatrous religions are based on a cult of worship or devotion to idols. So you lash out at people who believe in the unseen God to whom we are accountable. We can't own God. If you own something you cannot be accountable to it. That is what your problem is.

In Monotheism, extremists assume ownership over God. It is a carry over from paganism. That means paganism, polytheism, or idolatry are philosophically extremist. That makes sense because idolizing something is like becoming its fan which is technically extremist. Hence, the word fan is based on fan-atic.
 
What is the endgame here? do Indians aspire to kill all of them or force them out of the country?

Neither Indians can keep this up nor the victims can sit and wait their turn
 
What is the endgame here? do Indians aspire to kill all of them or force them out of the country?

Neither Indians can keep this up nor the victims can sit and wait their turn
Ghar wapsi-conversion, they think islam came with force it'll go with force
 
Ghar wapsi-conversion, they think islam came with force it'll go with force
It's not just the Muslims. The ideology being followed advocates all religions borne out of India. But what territorial definition of India? Everyone defines India separately
 
It's not just the Muslims. The ideology being followed advocates all religions borne out of India. But what territorial definition of India? Everyone defines India separately
Ask them mate... 😁
 
Ghar wapsi-conversion, they think islam came with force it'll go with force
Ghar wapsi for Hindus would be to Islamic Monotheism because Islam is in Rig Veda, at least in the initial scriptures. We never left it. Rig Veda uses the words heaven and earth in combination as does the Quran.
 
Last edited:
Dharamlal Kaushik, BJP legislator and leader of the opposition in the Chhattisgarh assembly, told Al Jazeera his party “is not against any community but the Congress must stop vote-bank politics” – a reference to minority communities presumably acting as captive voters in India.

LOL. It is the BJP which is the biggest vote-bank party in the world !

Three religions which originated from around the same area have been the source of all the violence ,ignorance and bloodshed in the world for centuries.

Ha ha. Tell that to the Dalits, the Shudras and the Hindu women who have been oppressed for 3000 years by the Brahminical caste system in South Asia. This system which is extremely Capitalist is the most oppressive human system ever devised.

Look below at how Islam brought emancipation to married women around the world including to Hindus. The below section from my thread from 2015 has the OP by an Indian Christian woman who married an Indian Muslim under Islamic law because that better secured her socio-economic rights in case of divorce :
One wonders why a reference to the Islamic law was not made either by the minister or other experts. Married Muslim women, we find, are often on a higher and more secure footing than their counterparts from other religions. In fact, as a Christian marrying a Muslim, I chose to marry under the Muslim personal law, even over the seemingly modern Special Marriage Act, 1954, to better secure my economic rights. My mehr was a house in my name and my nikahnama includes necessary clauses to safeguard my and my children’s rights. My husband’s family members were witness to this document, which is registered and enforceable by law.

When we examine marriage laws in their historic context, it is interesting to note that the universally accepted notion that marriages are contractual rather than sacramental originates in Muslim law, which was accepted by the French law only in the 1800s and incorporated into the English law in the 1850s and became part of codified Hindu law as late as 1955. Today it appears to be the most practical way of dealing with the institution of marriage. Treating marriage as a sacrament which binds the parties for life has resulted in some of the most discriminatory practices against women such as sati and denial of right to divorce and remarriage, even in the most adverse conditions.

The cornerstone of a Muslim marriage is consent, ejab-o-qubul (proposal and acceptance) and requires the bride to accept the marriage proposal on her own free will. This freedom to consent (or refuse), which was given to Muslim women 1,400 years ago, is still not available under Hindu law since sacramental rituals such as saptapadi and kanya dan (seven steps round the nuptial fire and gifting of the bride to the groom) still form essential ceremonies of a Hindu marriage. Even after the codification of Hindu law, the notion of consent is not built into the marriage ceremonies.

The contract of marriage (nikahnama) allows for negotiated terms and conditions, it can also include the right to a delegated divorce (talaq-e-tafweez) where the woman is delegated the right to divorce her husband if any of the negotiated terms and conditions are violated.

Mehr is another unique concept of Muslim law meant to safeguard the financial future of the wife. It is an obligation, not a choice, and can be in the form of cash, valuables or securities. While there is no ceiling, a minimum amount to provide her security after marriage must be stipulated. This is a more beneficial concept than streedhan which is given by choice and usually by the natal family. In addition to Mehr, at the time of divorce, a Muslim woman has the right to fair and reasonable settlement, and this is statutorily recognised under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 as per the 2001 ruling of the Supreme Court in the Daniel Latifi case.

It is also important to address polygamy and triple talaq, two aspects of Muslim law which are generally used to discredit the community and argue in favour of a uniform civil code. While sharia law permits a man to have four wives (before 1956 Hindu law permitted unrestrained polygamy), it mandates equal treatment of all wives. If a man is not able to meet these conditions, he is not permitted to marry more than one woman. (Quran 4:3; Yusuf Ali’s translation)

On the other hand, though codification introduced monogamy for Hindus, the ground reality has not changed and Hindu men continue to be bigamous or polygamous. The most disturbing aspect is that while men in bigamous/adulterous relationships are allowed to go scot-free, it is the women who are made to pay the price. Women in invalid relationships with Hindu men are denied maintenance and protection and are referred to as “mistresses” and “concubines”, concepts specific to the uncodified Hindu law. Any attempt to codify Muslim law to bring in legal monogamy should not end up subjecting Muslim women to a plight similar to that of a Hindu second wife. This is an important concern which needs to be taken into account while reforming the Muslim law.

And lastly, the much maligned triple talaq or talaq-ul-biddat, which the Prophet himself considered as the most inappropriate form of divorce. Fortunately, in 2002, in Shamim Ara vs State of Uttar Pradesh & others, the Supreme Court laid down strict Quranic injunctions which must be followed at the time of pronouncing talaq, hence now fraudulent practices adopted by errant husbands (including email and SMS talaq) can no longer constitute valid talaq. Yet, after a decade and a half, very few know challenge the validity of such divorces in court as they are unaware about this ruling.

Though Muslim law stipulates many different ways to end a marriage, including a woman’s right to dissolve her marriage (khula), divorce by mutual consent (mubarra), delegated divorce (talaq-e-tafweez), judicial divorce (fasq) and dissolution under Muslim Marriage Act
 
But Indian minister claims India is the world most secular country...
Secularism is a belief system that rejects religion, or the belief that religion should not be part of the affairs of the state or part of public education. The principles of separation of church and state and of keeping religion out of the public school system are an example of secularism.

Violence has no relation with the Secularism.
And most of the violence is due to mass conversions and protests against it, I’ve seen this many times in my home state where this BS happens everyday. Hindus crying Christians doing mass conversions, Christians crying Muslims doing Love Jihad and Muslims crying Hindus doing Fascism.
 
Back
Top Bottom