Why doesn't Pakistan send its Military in Afghanistan to help the afghans?

[Indus Pakistan]

Don't give me that we don't want new enemies crap.

It would be a disaster. The last thing you want is to send the army in. However there was a time when we should have insisted on having boots on the ground.

Back in 2001 when US asked our help to destroy the Taliban government in Kabul Musharaf should have agreed on one condition. That Pak will help US to go in to hunt OBL but we would also go in to make sure our interests are safe guarded.

That after Afghanistan is invaded Kabul must not fall in hands of anti Pak groups like Northern Alliance. Musharaf should have told the American the following.

1) USA has every right to hunt for OBL and what is needed in that regards.
2) Pakistan has every right that it's enemies do not end up taking over Kabul.

With this clear Pak should have sent a small force ( SSG ) to make sure no Northern Alliance people end up taking over Kabul. Musharaf did not do this ( in doing this screwing for the second time to Kargil ) and Pakistan ended up helping America to remove a pro Pak Kabul regime with pro India regime. Bravo General Musharaf bravo. We see the result of that every day now.

I often hear people in UK talk about the British leaving European Union. However one of the strongest arguments made for staying in EU is that "If we are in we can influence on where Europe goes". That is Europe is UK's neighbour and it is going to have profound effect on UK. Therefore you should be in the centre of making decisions that might have profound effect on you.

In other words you want to be sat in the crew cabin of a aeroplane so you have some say where it goes. If your not in there you have no control over where it goes.

Ditto Afghanistan. We chose to hand Afghanistan over to America. They in turn handed it to India. We should have said "we both go in, you go for OBL we will hang around to make sure no NA groups take over Kabul. Also while there PA could have protected the Pashtuns some of who suffferd terrible retribution from Tajiks of NA. This would also have bought us extra goodwill over the Pashtuns in Afghanistan. That way we would have made sure we had a handle on who takes over Kabul.

No responsible government would allow or worse help a external power to come and replace a friendly neighbour with a hostile enemy.

Now it is too late.

 

[Uzair Shafiq [Босс]]

[QUOTE="
Ditto Afghanistan. We chose to hand Afghanistan over to America. They in turn handed it to India.[/QUOTE]
And don't you think the fact that india is in the mix makes it dangerous? Since we all know about its funding activities

 

[FaujHistorian]

Don't give me that we don't want new enemies crap.

That's what has to be done at some time in near future,


The problem is that Pakistani civilians do not appreciate fully what Pakistani army can do in the region,

We cleaned up (almost) North Wazirastan in one year.

We can stabilize Afghanistan in 2-3 years and with existing capabilities.

But our media and intellectuals behave like bheegi billis (wet pussy) when it comes to tackling militant gang like Daesh, Taliban etc.

Thus it becomes very hard for Pakistani army to get mass support.

Such support is absolutely necessary in order to win war in Afghanistan .

 

[Jaanbaz]

I would rather trust an Israeli with my life then an Afghan.

 

[rashid.sarwar]

Hell no, russia and america both have send the armies and the results are.....

Diplomatic negotiation for peace only solution...

 

[B@KH]

Hell no, russia and america both have send the armies and the results are.....

Diplomatic negotiation for peace only solution...

both usa and Russia achieved in mountains and jungles what they wanted too.

They are not fools waging wars in several dozens countries and achieving nothing.

Infact the people can't see behind the curtain.

 

[B@KH]

.

It would be a disaster. The last thing you want is to send the army in. However there was a time when we should have insisted on having boots on the ground.

Back in 2001 when US asked our help to destroy the Taliban government in Kabul Musharaf should have agreed on one condition. That Pak will help US to go in to hunt OBL but we would also go in to make sure our interests are safe guarded.

That after Afghanistan is invaded Kabul must not fall in hands of anti Pak groups like Northern Alliance. Musharaf should have told the American the following.

1) USA has every right to hunt for OBL and what is needed in that regards.
2) Pakistan has every right that it's enemies do not end up taking over Kabul.

With this clear Pak should have sent a small force ( SSG ) to make sure no Northern Alliance people end up taking over Kabul. Musharaf did not do this ( in doing this screwing for the second time to Kargil ) and Pakistan ended up helping America to remove a pro Pak Kabul regime with pro India regime. Bravo General Musharaf bravo. We see the result of that every day now.

I often hear people in UK talk about the British leaving European Union. However one of the strongest arguments made for staying in EU is that "If we are in we can influence on where Europe goes". That is Europe is UK's neighbour and it is going to have profound effect on UK. Therefore you should be in the centre of making decisions that might have profound effect on you.

In other words you want to be sat in the crew cabin of a aeroplane so you have some say where it goes. If your not in there you have no control over where it goes.

Ditto Afghanistan. We chose to hand Afghanistan over to America. They in turn handed it to India. We should have said "we both go in, you go for OBL we will hang around to make sure no NA groups take over Kabul. Also while there PA could have protected the Pashtuns some of who suffferd terrible retribution from Tajiks of NA. This would also have bought us extra goodwill over the Pashtuns in Afghanistan. That way we would have made sure we had a handle on who takes over Kabul.

No responsible government would allow or worse help a external power to come and replace a friendly neighbour with a hostile enemy.

Now it is too late.

I guess things are overlapped in yr post.

The best option for pak was to stay Neutral which pak cannot due to its sitting in camp of war mongers usa and Saudi.

how one musharraf can be blamed for policy of fingering Afghans.

Musharraf gave full access to usa and even allowed use of our air bases.
Not to take part and Not landing own military into Afghanistan was right.

The Russian invasion of Afhgan and the usa invasion are to ensure the isolation of IRAN. Rest Afghan problem had nothing to do with Pakistan. Pakistan is only used by the powers.

USA installed Taliban so that they fight against IRAN and even installed sophisticated Radars in western Afghanistan during Taliban era. But Taliban started to normalize relations with Iran and opened western borders for trade. USA infact tried to trap Iran in Afghanistan by installing Taliban but itself got trapped. same happened in Iraq.

USA went in to topple Taliban that infact created a local armed rising powerful opposition against Taliban that could be dangerous to usa and could tilt Afghan towards Iran. The things usa did was to disarms the opposition to Taliban.

Pakistan is pissed off due to its alliance with terror countries like usa and Saudi.

Only neutrality will ensure Pak better relations with Afghanistan.

 

[JOEY TRIBIANI]

We dnt have to do this.

 

[rashid.sarwar]

both usa and Russia achieved in mountains and jungles what they wanted too.

They are not fools waging wars in several dozens countries and achieving nothing.

Infact the people can't see behind the curtain.

So soviet broken into pieces and American's dept crossed 16 trillion mark... nice....

 

[Pakistani till death]

Muslims?
Brother hood?
Quran ?
if that's not important
How about the fact that a disestablished afghanistan is not in our intrest

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/08/world/asia/suicide-truck-bombing-in-kabul-afghanistan.html

There is no brotherhood between countries there are only allies. If it was in our interest to join hands with india to attack another muslim country i would support it. If there was brotherhood then we wouldnt see iran cozying up with india and afghanistan wouldnt have started the pashtunistan movement and other things. The only time we will send our military there would be in case of war and in almost no time we'll be in kabul!

 

[B@KH]

So soviet broken into pieces and American's dept crossed 16 trillion mark... nice....

the Bi-Polar world was broken with the Rise of Islamic Revolution. لا شرقية و لا غربية اسلامية اسلامية

Imam Khomeini r.a send a delegation to Moscow to inform them abandon communism as soon it will be going into history.

Capitalists survived as they started hiding behind Religion while communists pole can't use religion to hide.

After the revolution Khadem Harmain Sharefain.

 

[shah1398]

Then who will mediate between Afghan Govt and Taliban? Is sending forces stabilizing factor or holding peace dialogue between two parties is the one?

 

[Psychic]

No thankyou. We don't want to have our Vietnam. Besides we have got our assets to do the job.

 

[B@KH]

No thankyou. We don't want to have our Vietnam. Besides we have got our assets to do the job.

Scary Vietnam.

 

[Super Falcon]

Yes why not but you already invited our enemy there and gave them safe heavens to fund terrorist groups and open small clinics near afghan pak border to first aid terrorist under youf nose but you dont know anything

You allow hindus to create probleum for ur brother nation is not wise from your side we open universities in afghanistan we gave you homes in pak but in return what karzai and abdullah do u know i but we still help u becoz we r brothers