What's new

Why can't China have national integration like India?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mughal were invaders from central Asia. Another chapter of Indian invasion started with Aryan invasion. And Maratha was just an empire within Indian subcontinent. Did Charlemagne's empire represented the whole Europe? Of course not. Neither would the regional empires within the Indian subcontinent.
Mauryan-Empire.gif
 
.
What has India done for Muslim minority? Nothing
 
. .
This is not surprising, because "India" land, no a nation has its own specific historical records, basically was alien occupation, race is quite complex, is a hybrid out

The land has been referred as Bharat or Bharatavarsha throughout history with foreign names India and Hindustan throughout history, all land East of Indus river and until Himalyas in the north had been India throughout history. ;) The name China is traced to Portuguese colonial period and mostly confined within East/South of Great Wall of China. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
.
.
What has India done for Muslim minority? Nothing

why should there be any minority/majority dichotomy in india?

why can't in india there be all considered indians?

similarly, why should there be any minority/majority dichotomy in china?

why can't in china there be all considered chinese?
 
. . .
"NO BRITISH, NO INDIA."

That is the Universal truth. Never understand why there's still people around denying this basic fact. India don't just come out of nowhere its a reaction to British Colonialism. Just like the Greeks of old decided to be "Greece" as a reaction toward Persian invasion.
 
.
"NO BRITISH, NO INDIA."

That is the Universal truth. Never understand why there's still people around denying this basic fact. India don't just come out of nowhere its a reaction to British Colonialism. Just like the Greeks of old decided to be "Greece" as a reaction toward Persian invasion.
so?? whatever be the history india exists now. Is india giving you nightmares ??
 
.
so?? whatever be the history india exists now. Is india giving you nightmares ??

Dude there's still people here that believe that the Brits done nothing in the unification of India. Usually when you have a differing opinions I don't mind it all, but when there's a guy denying basic fact like this is where I draw the line.
 
.
Dude there's still people here that believe that the Brits done nothing in the unification of India. Usually when you have a differing opinions I don't mind it all, but when there's a guy denying basic fact like this is where I draw the line.
It wasn't British. It was Muslims.
 
.
Dude there's still people here that believe that the Brits done nothing in the unification of India. Usually when you have a differing opinions I don't mind it all, but when there's a guy denying basic fact like this is where I draw the line.
Do u know anything about history of india??
 
.
What are views about cooked and uncooked barbarians in Chinese history and I heard most of Southern China wasn't Han Chinese even a 1000 years ago and they prefer to call themselves as Tang Chinese now. ;)

BTW my mother tongue in Hindi and I find it sharing light years distant similarities with European languages. :sarcastic:



As if Mongols and Manchus weren't foreign invaders. :sarcastic::sarcastic:

.


"Tang" wasn't even a concept of ethnic. It's just one of the names of how Chinese people call themselves (especially overseas Chinese) no matter if they are Northerners or Southerners.

Manchus (Qing) and Mongols (Yuan) were foreign invaders to Song and Ming, not "China".
Qing, Yuan, Song and Ming were Chinese dynasties.
 
. .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom