Why Are Indians Unhappy With Modi's Reception in Washington?

[Chhatrapati]

Link please.

Search for it and find why he attended a party meeting coinciding with a religious festival and thereby celebrating Bonalu festival.

But that goes against what you yourself said :

No... You can file a case if some candidate ask vote in the name of religion. We know who these parties adhere to and who their vote banks are by looking at their leaders and the causes they take up.

Not clear. You will have to elaborate.

That secularism is Indias principle and there is nothing in the constitution or the laws enacted that shows we stopped being secular.

 

[N.Siddiqui]

God Forbid, hope this doesn't show in the popularity of Modi in India and he wins for a third term with a landslide.

Modi is the best bet for Pakistan. An uneducated bigot, a megalomaniac, a chaiwala is a best bet for Pakistan.

Pakistan: Modi hai tau Mumkin hai.

'Dooh-Laan Trump': Internet breaks into fits following Modi's speech gaffe | The Express Tribune

To be honest,we should've seen it coming

tribune.com.pk

 

[hussain0216]

Jinnah would have been right if Pakistan was doing better than India. Pakistan is not even close to India. Jinnah must be turning in his grave.

Why not to prove your point, give a call to Indian muslims to take up arms? or ask them to join Pakistan by running away from Modi. Do you think there would be deluge of refugees to Pakistan? Do you think Indian muslims feel Pakistan is better than India? lol.

Pakistan has done better then India for the majority of its history, this is just statistical fact, you can look it up, for decades Pakistan has had a better standard of living, less hunger etc

Even now

Less hunger in Pakistan

India ranks below Pakistan, Sri Lanka in Global Hunger Index, report says not Open Defecation-Free yet

The annual index is designed to measure and track hunger at the global, national and regional levels and to assess progress and setbacks in combating hunger. India is now ranked below Pakistan (94), Bangladesh (88) and Sri Lanka (66) among South Asian nations.

www-indiatoday-in.cdn.ampproject.org

Safer for women

Exclusive: India most dangerous country for women with sexual violence rife - global poll

By Belinda Goldsmith and Meka BeresfordLONDON (Thomson Reuters Foundation) - India is the world's most dangerous country for women due to the high ri

mobile-reuters-com.cdn.ampproject.org

And millions of our people didn't die from covid due to Kumb Mela and government incompetence

India's Pandemic Death Toll Estimated At About 4 Million: 10 Times The Official Count

That's the number of "excess deaths" from January 2020 to June 2021, reflecting the true toll of COVID-19, say researchers in a new study. Why the big disparity?

www.npr.org

now let's be clear
Pakistan is only for Pakistani citizens

No Indians are welcome here, if you hate each other then partition india, but your not coming here and as India becomes a Increasingly hindutva extremist communal shithole full of hate divide and partition is only a matter of time

 

[Chhatrapati]

God Forbid, this doesn't show in the popularity of Modi in India and he wins for a third term with a landslide.

Modi is the best bet for Pakistan.

Pakistan: Modi hai tau Mumkin hai.

Strongman Indian PMs were mostly bad for Pakistan. I don't know how this reverse psychology coping mechanism works.
Take any for example Indira, Nehru, ABV, Modi. All of them has done irreversible damage to your claims vis Kashmir. Since 2000 you have been on a continuous decline vis India. And it's not going to change regardless of how bad you think Modi is for India unless you change your ways of dealing with India.

 

[Maula Jatt]

Strongman Indian PMs were mostly bad for Pakistan. I don't know how this reverse psychology coping mechanism works.
Take any for example Indira, Nehru, ABV, Modi. All of them has done irreversible damage to your claims vis Kashmir. Since 2000 you have been on a continuous decline vis India. And it's not going to change regardless of how bad you think Modi is for India unless you change your ways of dealing with India.

yes Modi is great
lets go!!
elect him all day, night long

no need to argue here

 

[N.Siddiqui]

Strongman Indian PMs were mostly bad for Pakistan. I don't know how this reverse psychology coping mechanism works.
Take any for example Indira, Nehru, ABV, Modi. All of them has done irreversible damage to your claims vis Kashmir. Since 2000 you have been on a continuous decline vis India. And it's not going to change regardless of how bad you think Modi is for India unless you change your ways of dealing with India.

Good that you are alluding to all these frivolous fancyful facts and you also think that Modi is good for India, we want this thinking to last and keep getting stronger.

 

[Sal12]

Strongman Indian PMs were mostly bad for Pakistan. I don't know how this reverse psychology coping mechanism works.
Take any for example Indira, Nehru, ABV, Modi. All of them has done irreversible damage to your claims vis Kashmir. Since 2000 you have been on a continuous decline vis India. And it's not going to change regardless of how bad you think Modi is for India unless you change your ways of dealing with India.

Modi is not strongman. You Indians have no idea how Modi is perceived outside India. Modi lost 1000 sq of Ladakh in 2020. Neither your Media nor Modi Govt disclosed publicly how much land of Ladakh became buffer zone and how much is still occupied by China since 2020. Every day we listen news of Chinese incursion and most recently was in Uthrakhand. Modi never named China in all this episode.

Then Feb 2019 was a total humiliation for India when world saw the wreckage of Mig21 and Indian media went to the new low where it was showing the wreckage of its Mig21 as a proof that it shot down F16.

 

[gulli]

Be fair and feel sorry for Mr. Modi too since his visit wasn't covered by the American press. Watch this vid at 02:13.

You may care for amriki media i don't.. I dont even care for Indian media.. all are corrupt to core..

 

[Wood]

That your advise to us has nothing to do with Secularism. And you don't understand what it is as seen from your subsequent posts.

Don't care enough to advise or argue with people on the internet. I'm just stating an opinion.

But you will find US President taking oath placing one hand on Bible. All these are cultural aspects specifically to the US. They don't need special laws to accommodate religious preferences because when US was created it was 99% Christian. Unlike India which had millions of people from other religions and the dietary restrictions which regards to beef is added in the Constitution by the makers. It's part of the culture of this land.
Defence minister is free to follow his religion and customs. So there is nothing wrong in what he did.

Legislation that is based on religious preference is not secular by nature.

 

[jamahir]

That secularism is Indias principle and there is nothing in the constitution or the laws enacted that shows we stopped being secular.

Fine, the preamble to the Constitution declares India to be secular and the Constitution itself tries to take a non-religious tone but have the governments been following that ?

You'll not find American defence minister performing religious rites on defence equipment. They don't have different civil laws to accommodate religious preferences.

Good point. Even though these Western governments continue their Crusader past by invading or sabotaging progressive Muslim-majority countries ( 1980s Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria etc ) yet they don't internally do much of Christian religious rituals.

Unlike India which had millions of people from other religions and the dietary restrictions which regards to beef is added in the Constitution by the makers. It's part of the culture of this land.
Defence minister is free to follow his religion and customs. So there is nothing wrong in what he did.

Since India has a mixed religion community, either the defense minister should have done religious rituals for all Indian religions or ideally not done any religious ritual at all.

I dont even care for Indian media.. all are corrupt to core..

I hope you include Godi Media as well.

 

[Turingsage]

Better than holding the phone to your chest and pinning and whining
"Why wont he call. Please please I beg you please call, Do you not realise the whole Izzat of Pakistan is at stake. What will people say"

 

[Falconless]

 

[Chhatrapati]

Don't care enough to advise or argue with people on the internet. I'm just stating an opinion.

Alright, I respect that.

Legislation that is based on religious preference is not secular by nature.

In a way yes. But certain laws are necessary to keep the union intact considering the large divide religiously and culturally. Constitution makers were aware of it and yet modelled a constitution that has been as true to the preamble as possible. Still has nothing that threatens secularism.

Modi is not strongman. You Indians have no idea how Modi is perceived outside India. Modi lost 1000 sq of Ladakh in 2020. Neither your Media nor Modi Govt disclosed publicly how much land of Ladakh became buffer zone and how much is still occupied by China since 2020. Every day we listen news of Chinese incursion and most recently was in Uthrakhand. Modi never named China in all this episode.

Then Feb 2019 was a total humiliation for India when world saw the wreckage of Mig21 and Indian media went to the new low where it was showing the wreckage of its Mig21 as a proof that it shot down F16.

Guess somebody doesn't know what a strongman politician means. please don't repeat the verbal diarrhea when you figure it out.

Good that you are alluding to all these frivolous fancyful facts and you also think that Modi is good for India, we want this thinking to last and keep getting stronger.

Only time will tell if he is good for India. His policies so far have far-reaching consequences and the repercussions or reactions are not immediately felt. Infrastructure and creation of basic needs wise, he is better than the last one and at par with ABV.

You shouldn't be even thinking about how he is for Indians because it doesn't affect you. The embarrassing thing about it is, Pakistani Prime minister and his cabinet are obsessed with the drama in Indian politics and they think the people around the world is watching the Indian political squabbles that you can't stop talking about RSS-BJP and Modi. As if anyone cares about all that.

 

[Valiant]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1443478933320527875

Be ready to gouge your eyes out and pour acid inside your ears

 

[salute]

I'm not at doubt about what secularism is supposed to be. Not sure what you want to show with a Google search.

You'll not find American defence minister performing religious rites on defence equipment. They don't have different civil laws to accommodate religious preferences. There is no dietary restriction on people based on religious guidelines.

The reference to 'one nation under God' was coined at a time when the Westerners themselves were not politically mature to practice secularism the same way that they practice today.

Seriously, you are equating Western Christian secularism which has its own history to India's secularism which actually meant a plural society and has not the word 'secularism' in the constitution. There are dietary restrictions as well as control of our temples by the government. Abolishment of many vices of our religions is also is done through legislation. None of these are to be seen in Western Christian secularism. They leave religion be no matter what.

You can't keep majority religion under the control and expect the secularism to be extended to only minority religions. If you want to be secular become truly secular.