ptldM3
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2009
- Messages
- 5,586
- Reaction score
- 19
- Country
- Location
Perhaps the smart@$$ who wanted to be called a smart@$$ by designing a new drive system for Russian tanks?
Everything about the tank is new, as it should be. By your logic why does the Abrams not use a "drive system" from the ww2 Sherman?
Everyone is human, the unexperienced driver made a mistake and all of the sudden the trolls come out in full force. Even if it actually broke down it is still a prototype and all prototypes have issues that take time to solve. At the end though it was human error and a bunch of trolls now have egg on their faces.
What, were you there, chief ? And it took them FIFTEEN MINUTES to figure out they had the brake on ? HOLY SHIT !!!
No i was not there but thousands of people were there as witnesses including a guy from another forum i go to. Obviously at first everyone suspected that it was mechanical but it turns out it was the emergency lockup breaking system. And while you are trolling and acting like a smart *** you would not have figured out the problem any sooner especially if you had little experience with the tanks operation systems, a tank is a lot more complex to operate then a car, i don't think that there is a hand break, so it would not be that obvious.