What's new

Who is Fighting Who in Syria?

Recent confessions from arrested militants have revealed alarming details about their operations and support networks. These confessions indicate that militants have received substantial backing, including equipment and financial compensation, particularly from Turkey.

Key Highlights from the Confessions:​

  • Support from Turkey: The militants claimed that Turkey provides them with essential equipment and facilities to conduct their operations. This support reportedly includes financial compensation of 10,000 lira per day for each individual involved in militant activities.
  • First Combat Experience: One of the arrested individuals mentioned that this was their first time in combat after recently joining the armed group. This highlights the recruitment of new fighters, often inexperienced, who are drawn into conflicts with the promise of financial incentives.

Context of the Situation:​

  • Militant Groups in Syria: The ongoing conflict in Syria has seen various militant groups, some backed by foreign nations, engage in violent confrontations. Turkey's involvement has been a point of contention, as it has been accused of supporting groups that contribute to instability in the region.
  • International Concerns: The revelations about Turkish support for these militants raise significant concerns regarding terrorism financing and the broader implications for regional security. Such support not only fuels the conflict but also complicates efforts to achieve peace and stability in Syria.
  • Geopolitical Implications: The situation underscores the intricate web of alliances and hostilities in the region, where state actors like Turkey are implicated in supporting non-state militant groups. This dynamic poses challenges for international diplomacy and counter-terrorism efforts.

Conclusion​

The confessions of arrested militants shed light on the troubling connections between state support and militant activities in Syria. As these dynamics unfold, they highlight the urgent need for comprehensive strategies to address terrorism financing and promote stability in conflict-affected regions. The international community must remain vigilant and responsive to these developments to mitigate further escalation and violence.

 
. .
Hopefully, Syrian refugees from liberated areas will return. The regime and its supporters showed shocking inhumanity toward them as if they are terrorists. Never a word of concern for their safety and well being.
 
.
Saudi Arabia and Egypt have expressed their support for Syria in its ongoing struggle against terrorism, marking a significant shift in regional dynamics. This support comes amid heightened tensions and violence in Syria, particularly following recent advances by rebel groups in key areas such as Aleppo and Idlib.

Diplomatic Engagements​

In recent diplomatic meetings, Syrian Foreign Minister Bassam Sabbagh engaged with his counterparts from Saudi Arabia and Egypt, discussing urgent regional issues and reinforcing bilateral relations. The talks took place on the sidelines of a preparatory meeting for an upcoming Arab-Islamic summit in Riyadh. During these discussions, both Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan and Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty emphasized the importance of a unified Arab stance against terrorism and the need to restore stability to the region.Sabbagh highlighted Syria's commitment to bolstering alliances with neighboring Arab nations, reflecting a broader strategy to enhance cooperation against shared threats. The ministers agreed on the necessity of maintaining open lines of communication to address mutual interests and challenges.

Context of Support​

The backdrop of this support is the ongoing conflict in Syria, which has seen significant violence since the civil war erupted in 2011. The Syrian government, led by President Bashar al-Assad, has faced numerous challenges from various opposition groups, many of which are labeled as terrorist organizations by the regime. In recent months, there has been a resurgence of rebel activity, particularly with the capture of strategic locations in Aleppo.Saudi Arabia and Egypt's backing of Syria can be seen as part of a broader effort to counteract extremist groups that threaten regional security. Both countries have historically been wary of the rise of Islamist factions within Syria and have sought to stabilize the region through diplomatic engagement with Assad's government.

Implications for Regional Politics​

The support from Saudi Arabia and Egypt signifies a potential realignment in Middle Eastern politics. Historically, both nations have been critical of Assad's regime, especially during the height of the Syrian civil war when they supported opposition forces. However, recent developments indicate a willingness to engage with Assad as part of a strategy to combat terrorism and foster stability.This shift may also be influenced by broader geopolitical considerations, including concerns about Iranian influence in Syria and its implications for Gulf security. By supporting Assad's government, Saudi Arabia and Egypt may be attempting to counterbalance Iran's presence in the region while also addressing their own national security interests.

Conclusion​

The expression of support from Saudi Arabia and Egypt for Syria in its fight against terrorism marks a notable development in regional diplomacy. As these nations seek to strengthen ties with Damascus, it reflects a pragmatic approach to addressing shared security concerns. The evolving dynamics underscore the complexities of Middle Eastern politics, where alliances can shift rapidly based on emerging threats and strategic interests.As the situation in Syria continues to unfold, it will be crucial for all parties involved to navigate these changes carefully, ensuring that efforts to combat terrorism do not come at the expense of human rights and regional stability.

1733139860188.png
 
.
Russia has initiated extensive airstrikes across Syria in response to a rapid offensive by rebel groups, particularly targeting those backed by the United States and Turkey. This military action aims to halt the advances of Islamist-led factions that have recently captured significant territory, including parts of Aleppo, Syria's second-largest city.

Details of the Airstrikes​

The joint air raids conducted by Russian and Syrian forces primarily focused on areas controlled by the Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) coalition and other allied factions. These strikes have resulted in numerous civilian casualties, with reports indicating at least 25 deaths, including children, as the attacks targeted populated areas and displacement camps in regions like Idlib province. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reported that the airstrikes hit locations where displaced families were seeking refuge from ongoing conflict.

Context of the Conflict​

The escalation of violence comes after a period of relative dormancy in the conflict, which has persisted since President Bashar al-Assad's crackdown on pro-democracy protests in 2011. The recent offensive by rebel groups marks one of the most significant challenges to Assad's regime in recent years, as they have managed to seize control of strategic locations and military installations around Aleppo.Assad's government, supported by Russia and Iran, has vowed to reclaim lost territories and eliminate what it describes as terrorist threats. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov reiterated Russia's commitment to supporting Assad, stating that they are analyzing the situation closely and will continue their military assistance.

Implications for Regional Stability​

The renewed fighting raises concerns about further destabilization in Syria and the potential for increased humanitarian crises. The conflict has already resulted in over 500,000 deathsand displaced millions. With many civilians living in makeshift shelters under dire conditions, the latest airstrikes threaten to exacerbate an already critical humanitarian situation.International reactions have been mixed, with Western nations urging for de-escalation and protection of civilians. The U.S., along with allies such as France and Germany, has called for all parties involved to prioritize humanitarian access and prevent further displacement.

Conclusion​

Russia's massive airstrikes across Syria represent a significant escalation in the ongoing conflict, aimed at countering rebel advances that threaten the Assad regime's stability. As both sides prepare for continued hostilities, the humanitarian implications remain severe, necessitating urgent international attention to protect vulnerable populations caught in the crossfire. The situation underscores the complexity of the Syrian civil war, where multiple factions and foreign powers continue to vie for influence amidst a backdrop of widespread suffering.

 
.
More than 30,000 members of the Shia Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) from Iraq have reportedly crossed into Syria to support the Syrian army in its ongoing battles, particularly in Aleppo. This deployment is part of a broader Iranian strategy to bolster the Assad regime against various opposition forces amid escalating conflict in the region.
Key Details:
  • Deployment Context: The influx of PMF fighters, including groups like Kataib Hezbollah and Harakat Hezbollah al-Nujaba, comes as Syrian opposition forces have made significant advances, capturing key areas. The PMF's involvement aims to reinforce Assad's military capabilities and stabilize his regime during this critical phase of the Syrian civil war
  • Iran's Role: The deployment is seen as a direct result of Iranian influence over these militias, which have historically operated under Tehran's guidance. Many of these groups report directly to Iran rather than the Iraqi government, reflecting their role as proxies in regional conflict
  • Strategic Implications: The presence of such a large contingent of Iraqi fighters in Syria highlights the ongoing sectarian and geopolitical dimensions of the conflict. It underscores Iran's commitment to maintaining its influence in Syria and supporting allied regimes against both local and external threats, including U.S. interests in the region
Current Situation:
The situation remains fluid as both the Syrian army and opposition forces continue to clash over control of strategic territories. The involvement of Iraqi PMF fighters is likely to escalate tensions further, complicating an already volatile situation in Syria and potentially drawing more regional actors into the conflict.

 
.
The Syrian Air Force has conducted airstrikes targeting terrorist strongholds and their supporters in central Idlib as part of its ongoing military operations. This action is a response to the recent advances made by rebel forces in the region, particularly following their capture of significant areas, including Aleppo.

Key Details:​

  • Targeted Areas: The airstrikes focused on positions held by Islamist groups, notably Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), which has been a dominant force in Idlib. The Syrian government aims to reclaim control over territories that have been under opposition control since the civil war began.
  • Context of the Conflict: The Syrian civil war, which started in 2011, has seen various factions vying for power, with Idlib being one of the last major strongholds for opposition forces. The recent military actions by both the Syrian government and its allies, including Russia, indicate a renewed intensity in the conflict.
  • Civilian Impact: Airstrikes in densely populated areas often lead to civilian casualties and exacerbate the humanitarian crisis in the region. Reports from monitoring groups indicate that recent military operations have resulted in significant fatalities among both combatants and civilians.

Broader Implications:​

The escalation of airstrikes and military operations highlights the fragile situation in Syria, where ceasefires have repeatedly failed to hold. As the Syrian government seeks to consolidate power and eliminate opposition forces, the potential for increased violence and humanitarian suffering remains high. The international community continues to monitor these developments closely, with calls for accountability and protection of civilians amidst ongoing hostilities.

 
.
Assad is unbothered that millions of Syrians are refugees for years, he is an egomaniac tyrant who outwardly seems reasonable but has no empathy for humanity, similar to serial killers (like Ted Bundy). What is horrifying is that we are in an age in which the world has many leaders and politicians like that.
 
Last edited:
.
Bhai we need to ensure that no Pakistani gets drafted into any of the parties fighting it out in Syria. Pakistanis should stay out of sectarianism and politics. Our country is not worthless nor our people cannon fodder.
 
.
Iran's delivery of Qaem-5 precision-guided glide bombs to Russia marks a deepening of their military collaboration. These weapons are reportedly being outfitted on Russian aircraft to execute targeted airstrikes, particularly in Aleppo, Syria. The Qaem-5, compatible with drones and manned aircraft, enhances Russia's ability to conduct precision strikes in contested regions where rebel factions and other non-state actors are present.
This partnership underscores Iran's and Russia's strategic interests in maintaining influence in Syria. Iran is set to lead ground operations, leveraging its established presence and support for the Syrian regime, while Russia focuses on aerial campaigns. Aleppo, a critical area due to its geographic and strategic significance, is central to these coordinated operations.
The collaboration has drawn international scrutiny, especially as both countries face criticism for their roles in escalating regional conflicts. The United States and its allies are particularly concerned about the implications of such weapon transfers, given their potential to change the dynamics of localized conflicts and extend Iran's and Russia's influence in the Middle East
This development reflects a broader geopolitical alignment between Moscow and Tehran, which continues to challenge Western policies in the region.

1733294368158.png
 
.
Reports indicate that significant numbers of Syrian government jets have been left at Neirab airbase, located near Aleppo International Airport. The situation raises questions about the operational status of these aircraft, as it is unclear how many are non-functional and how many could still be utilized for flight operations.

Key Points:​

  • Aircraft Status: The exact number of jets abandoned at Neirab airbase is not specified, but there are concerns regarding whether they are primarily dead jets intended for spare parts or if some remain capable of flying. The Syrian Arab Air Force (SyAAF) has faced heavy losses throughout the ongoing conflict, leading to a mix of operational and non-operational aircraft at various bases.
  • Historical Context: The Syrian Air Force has been significantly impacted by the civil war, with numerous aircraft damaged or destroyed due to combat operations and rebel attacks. Reports have indicated that many aircraft have been left in disrepair across various airbases, including Neirab.
  • Strategic Importance: Neirab airbase has historically served as a critical location for Syrian air operations, particularly in the Aleppo region. The presence of jets there could indicate potential for future military operations if they can be restored to operational status.
  • Current Military Dynamics: The ongoing conflict in Aleppo, with recent advances by rebel groups, may have influenced the Syrian government's decision to abandon certain aircraft at the base. The situation remains fluid, with potential implications for both government and rebel forces in the region.

Broader Implications:​

The status of the jets at Neirab airbase reflects broader challenges faced by the Syrian military in maintaining its air force capabilities amidst ongoing conflict. As the situation evolves, the ability of the Syrian government to leverage its remaining air assets will be crucial in its efforts to regain control over contested areas like Aleppo. The presence of these aircraft also highlights the complexities of military logistics and resource management in a protracted conflict.

 
. .
Reports indicate that significant numbers of Syrian government jets have been left at Neirab airbase, located near Aleppo International Airport. The situation raises questions about the operational status of these aircraft, as it is unclear how many are non-functional and how many could still be utilized for flight operations.

Key Points:​

  • Aircraft Status: The exact number of jets abandoned at Neirab airbase is not specified, but there are concerns regarding whether they are primarily dead jets intended for spare parts or if some remain capable of flying. The Syrian Arab Air Force (SyAAF) has faced heavy losses throughout the ongoing conflict, leading to a mix of operational and non-operational aircraft at various bases.
  • Historical Context: The Syrian Air Force has been significantly impacted by the civil war, with numerous aircraft damaged or destroyed due to combat operations and rebel attacks. Reports have indicated that many aircraft have been left in disrepair across various airbases, including Neirab.
  • Strategic Importance: Neirab airbase has historically served as a critical location for Syrian air operations, particularly in the Aleppo region. The presence of jets there could indicate potential for future military operations if they can be restored to operational status.
  • Current Military Dynamics: The ongoing conflict in Aleppo, with recent advances by rebel groups, may have influenced the Syrian government's decision to abandon certain aircraft at the base. The situation remains fluid, with potential implications for both government and rebel forces in the region.

Broader Implications:​

The status of the jets at Neirab airbase reflects broader challenges faced by the Syrian military in maintaining its air force capabilities amidst ongoing conflict. As the situation evolves, the ability of the Syrian government to leverage its remaining air assets will be crucial in its efforts to regain control over contested areas like Aleppo. The presence of these aircraft also highlights the complexities of military logistics and resource management in a protracted conflict.

All ancient derelicts! Abandoned for years, or they'd a flown off no?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom