as expected india's biggest show of strength and comfort comes from back stabbing a small nation in the middle of a civil war!
Ohh, so now it is backstabbing a smaller neighbor... where was this sense victim hood and realization of being a "small neighbor"..when you tried incite a civil war Indian Kashmir in 65, the only difference is where you failed, we succeeded.
Your bouts of victim-hood, self pity (ohh poor us!!) coincide with your losses, otherwise you pretend to be lions.
clearly you cannot call 65 a victory because after 17 days of war india had not destroyed Pakistan and as for depeleted war ammunation etc etc well that if it was the case then india should have carried on fighting why stop and accept a ceasefire?
Obviously 65 was not clear victory for India, but India won more than Pakistan and lost less than her.
Intelligence about depleted resources was not available until the war was over. Out here Indian generals were worried that there reserves might get exhausted in the war..but it was only after the war, it was found that India had 85% of its reserves, where as Pakistan was down to 14 %.
17 days and Pakistan "DEFENCE!" was intact and hence the indians had to make do with a ceasefire! shameful fact given the sheer size of the nation of india!
65 unlike was not a planned war,It was war, which was thrusted upon India by Pakistani adventurism, Indian generals were merely reacting to developing situations, hence results were not as impressive as 71. We were lucky, we din't loose Kashmir in 65 and you were lucky, you din't loose Pakistan in 65".
however, as expected the indians got involved in a civil war 6 years later & till date boast about how they got involved in a civil war and "won". with or without indian support bangladesh would have been created! it was meant to be both nations had different ideology altogether!
Yes you are right, "as expected India got involved in a pakistani civil war" you definitely should have expected India to get involved,especially after what you tried do Kashmir in 65. Had you not tried your foolish antics in Kashmir, perhaps India would have felt necessary to get involved in your civil war and perhaps Pakistan still might have been intact.
Every body is smarter in hindsight..if you guys had a different ideology..why didn't give them freedom, why did you killed and raped so many of them and created a refugee problem for us.. thereby inviting our interdiction?
so i still maintain let india dare cross the border into Pakistan and see their dhotis get stained!
Indian Dhotis were neither stained, 65, 71 or 99..but we did manage to bring an end to your arrogance ,from " we are lions, One Muslim soldier is equal to 10 Hindu Kafirs" to "ohh we are a small neighbor".
by fooling its public should be ashamed and i m writing once more that if there wouldn't have been U.S,there was no pakistan.
coz U.S dont want to loose a ally who can fight its wars 
and whose military is just like own military .
