What Has NOT Changed in China? An Analysis of the Chinese One-Party Dictatorship

[Thomas]

Do not forget that time, China just after independence, the belong to the Third World, famine is widespread in the Third World, you will accuse the Third World Government's massacre of their people because of famine?

The famine caused a large reduction in the population, of course, you could say he is because the Chinese government's wrong policies

The Cultural Revolution and famine are different, hope do not need to remind this point

the title of the thread is "What Has NOT Changed in China? An Analysis of the Chinese One-Party Dictatorship". I pointed out what still has not changed with the CCP. Looking at it's past faults which included it's part in causing much of the famine in China by mismanagement is relevant. Today's modern CCP mismanagement should also include the scale of industrial pollution in China. In at least a 2+ party system. Pressure can be brought to bear for better management of resources. And better treatment of it's people.

BBC NEWS | Asia-Pacific | China's murky waters

 

[huzihaidao12]

the title of the thread is "What Has NOT Changed in China? An Analysis of the Chinese One-Party Dictatorship". I pointed out what still has not changed with the CCP. Looking at it's past faults which included it's part in causing much of the famine in China by mismanagement is relevant. Today's modern CCP mismanagement should also include the scale of industrial pollution in China. In at least a 2+ party system. Pressure can be brought to bear for better management of resources. And better treatment of it's people.

BBC NEWS | Asia-Pacific | China's murky waters

Mao Zedongs cultural revolution killed more people then Stalin and Hitler combined. Also not sure what your talking about in regards to U.S. Government massacring hundreds of millions of people.

This is another issue, the discussion is free, but they should not confuse the problems discussed earlier. With regard to the environment, China's new energy strategy, you heard? That is the answer.

We are not rich, only side edge pollution control, of course, is also the case in other developed countries, the United Kingdom, the United States and Japan. Now, with adequate financial and technical reserves, China has started to control pollution and environmental governance in many parts of the project as the official assessment of his importance and even the same family planning.

Monitoring the government is important, but you gave a wrong example

 

[Thomas]

This is another issue, the discussion is free, but they should not confuse the problems discussed earlier. With regard to the environment, China's new energy strategy, you heard? That is the answer.

We are not rich, only side edge pollution control, of course, is also the case in other developed countries, the United Kingdom, the United States and Japan. Now, with adequate financial and technical reserves, China has started to control pollution and environmental governance in many parts of the project as the official assessment of his importance and even the same family planning.

Monitoring the government is important, but you gave a wrong example

You keep referring to other third world countries. But there are no other third world countries that have the scale of pollution that China does. 10 of the top 10 most polluted cites in the world are in China. Granted the Government has created some new environmental laws. But those laws are regularly ignored by the local Government officials. Other projects like the "Green Gross Domestic Product project" failed completely. just another example why 1 party rule is bad (no true accountability). and further showing that the local Governments are just as corrupt as they were in Mao's time.

 

[Honor]

You keep referring to other third world countries. But there are no other third world countries that have the scale of pollution that China does. 10 of the top 10 most polluted cites in the world are in China. Granted the Government has created some new environmental laws. But those laws are regularly ignored by the local Government officials. Other projects like the "Green Gross Domestic Product project" failed completely. just another example why 1 party rule is bad (no true accountability).

US is always the top polluter in the world. China just overtook US in this category.

US herself had pulled out from the Kyoto during the Bush Regime. US had no accountability to the world. She did what she see fits herself.

 

[huzihaidao12]

You keep referring to other third world countries. But there are no other third world countries that have the scale of pollution that China does. 10 of the top 10 most polluted cites in the world are in China. Granted the Government has created some new environmental laws. But those laws are regularly ignored by the local Government officials. Other projects like the "Green Gross Domestic Product project" failed completely. just another example why 1 party rule is bad (no true accountability).

third world ？Even the United States, Britain, France and Japan are the same, the inevitable pollution of industrialization, and accumulation of capital and technology, and then began to control pollution, this is the first controlled and then treatment. No other parties have a more accurate, because the money does not appear out of thin air.

China's industrialization is the largest in the world, and he is also the world's pollution level. Key words are industrialization, and that pollutionpollution,We do not have a big pollution 30 years ago, also did not present economies of scale.
But it is important that is changing, the Chinese government has formulated a new strategy, and indeed to do。China even has started to control pollution and environmental governance in many parts of the project as the official assessment of his importance and even the same family planning.

 

[huzihaidao12]

Monitoring the government is important, but you gave a wrong example .
Can only say that

 

[huzihaidao12]

You have gone too far into the deep end. Are you saying that for the last 60-something years, mainland China have been unable to generate wealth, not because of the flaws of communism, but because someone somehow stole the necessary resources, human and nature, to generate wealth?

Was almost confused you succeed, your logic have a problem. Simply put, it is America's logic, the logic of imperialism, not China's logic, nor is it the logic of sovereign states, I will specifically talk about have more free time.

 

[Sino-PakFriendship]

the title of the thread is "What Has NOT Changed in China? An Analysis of the Chinese One-Party Dictatorship". I pointed out what still has not changed with the CCP. Looking at it's past faults which included it's part in causing much of the famine in China by mismanagement is relevant. Today's modern CCP mismanagement should also include the scale of industrial pollution in China. In at least a 2+ party system. Pressure can be brought to bear for better management of resources. And better treatment of it's people.

BBC NEWS | Asia-Pacific | China's murky waters

USA is not a democratic state, but 2-party dictatorship state!

This is monopolistic competition!

No way for 3rd party to be elected!

 

[huzihaidao12]

If you have read the "CHINA SHAKES THE WORLD", a little note

In CHAPTER II
ACROSS THE GREAT PLAIN
7. Eating the Landlords' Flesh



　　“大娘，别唠叨啦，大家烦死了，人家这位外国客人也会见怪的。 “

　　“我不信人家外国人像你说的那样。”大娘顶了一句。

"Hush up, old woman, you'll talk us all to death. You'll be giving this foreign guest a bad impression."

　　"And do you think it's like that in his country?" the old woman retorted.

This "old woman", it should be in Chinese Village's "大娘" ，the English translation should be "aunt", which is kind of a habit honorific。 English language can be directly translated into "old (&#22823 woman (&#23064", but the tone is not right.

 

[Sino-PakFriendship]

Western Whites' view on China!