What's new

Western scholars press Japan's Abe on war history

Raphael

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 1, 2012
Messages
3,287
Reaction score
5
Country
China
Location
China
Western scholars press Japan's Abe on war history| Reuters

More than 450 mostly Western scholars have urged Prime Minister Shinzo Abe to confront boldly Japan's wartime past, the latest sign that the conservative leader has not erased concern that he wants to dilute past apologies.

During a high-profile trip to the United States last month, Abe expressed "repentance" over Japan's role in World War Two in a speech to Congress. But the scholars' letter suggests his public contrition has not eased foreign misgivings.

Japan's wartime legacy haunts ties with neighbors, in particular China and South Korea, and the 70th anniversary of the war's end in August has focused attention on the issue and on Abe's bid to adopt a more assertive defense policy.

The scholars, including two Pulitzer Prize-winning historians, called in a letter for Abe to address Japan's "history of colonial rule and wartime aggression", including the issue of "comfort women", as those forced to work in wartime military brothels are euphemistically known in Japan.

"As scholars of Japan and of Japan's place in the world, our collective responsibility rests on fostering open discussions ... and in leaving an honest record of its past for current and future generations," University of Connecticut professor Alexis Dudden, one of two coordinators of the project, told Reuters in an email.

Abe said during his U.S. visit he would uphold past apologies but has also repeatedly said he wants to issue a forward-looking statement to mark the anniversary of the war's end.

Many of his conservative allies think Japan has apologized enough.

One of them, Abe special aide Koichi Hagiuda, said the outline of the premier's anniversary comments on history had been set in his speech to Congress and at an April conference in Indonesia. "There won’t be a big change," he told Reuters.

The wording of Abe's anniversary statement could affect a thaw in Sino-Japanese relations and prospects for improved ties with South Korea, where the issue of "comfort women" is a major irritant.

Abe said in America his heart ached for the women's suffering and that he stood by a 1993 statement acknowledging authorities' involvement in coercing them.

Many Japanese conservatives, though, say the women were prostitutes and there was no evidence that Japan's military or government were directly involved in forcing them.

The scholars criticized such "legalistic arguments".

"This year represents an opportunity for the government of Japan to show leadership in addressing Japan's history of colonial rule and wartime aggression in both words and action," they said.
 
This is no small issue and Abe and like minded clowns cannot diminish the severity of the crimes commited in the past.

Accountability will be easier to settle now than to let the issue fester. Look at Germany and see the persecution of all things Nazi.

Chinese rise in the next half century will hopefully shy awar from seeking retribution but accountability for the war will not be let off.
 
Keep the presuure, and much harder, on Japan. Dont let up!!!

"The wording of Abe's anniversary statement could affect a thaw in Sino-Japanese relations and prospects for improved ties with South Korea, where the issue of "comfort women" is a major irritant."

It is not only about the attitudes of the Japanese as conveyed in Abe's high-profiled watered-down speech in Capitol Hill on the subject of "comfort women" which though by its own right is a very disturbing page in WW2 history about Imperial Japan's invasion but also it is about the post war Japanese wholesome denial of their severe atrocities, of course, on China which goes far beyond "comfort women.

On top, Japan's attempt to lodge these applications for the world's official recognition in UN is bizzare. They all together indicate Japan is not only endorsing but trying to gloss over its barbaric history while trying to fool the world by blanching its grave wrong doings


China opposes Japan's bid for wartime facilities' recognition
English.news.cn | 2015-05-14 20:20:11 | Editor: huaxia
China opposes Japan's bid for wartime facilities' recognition - Xinhua | English.news.cn


BEIJING, May 14 (Xinhua) -- China on Thursday said it opposed Japan's bid to have 23 coal mines, shipyards and other early industrial zones recognized as world heritage sites.

According to Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying, on the list there are some facilities where forced laborers from China, the Korean Peninsula and other Asian countries toiled during World War II.

The Republic of Korea (ROK) has condemned Japan's move as "distortion" and an attempt to gloss over crimes committed during a brutal colonial and wartime past.

Hua expressed China's grave concern over Japan's move and urged Japan to acknowledge and properly respond to such concerns.

Hua said a world heritage application should promote peace as upheld by UNESCO and the Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage.

However, reasonable demands by former forced laborers have never been resolved nor received any response from the Japanese side. "If Japan ignores the slave labor issues in theses industrial zones, what kind of signal is the country sending to the international community?" Hua said.

Earlier this week, the International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS) gave the green light to Japan's attempt to gain recognition for the sites, according to Japanese media.

ICOMOS evaluates cultural relics for UNESCO's World Heritage Committee. Hua said China believes that the World Heritage Committee will handle the issue in a responsible way.

When asked to comment on security bills approved by Japan's cabinet on Thursday to significantly expand the scope of overseas operations by the self-defense forces, Hua hoped Japan would follow the path of peaceful development and play a constructive role in Asia.



Japan city renews UN bid for kamikaze pilot letters - BBC News

Japan city renews UN bid for kamikaze pilot letters
  • 13 May 2015
  • From the sectionAsia
_82978657_82978656.jpg

Hundreds of pilots carried out one-way missions to try and halt the Allied advance in the final months of WW2


A southern Japanese city is trying for a second time to seek Unesco recognition for letters written by kamikaze pilots during World War Two.

Minamikyushu wants the farewell letters of pilots who headed off on suicide missions in the last months of the war to be listed as documentary heritage.

Mayor Kampei Shimoide said the letters help to promote peace by highlighting the horror of war.

A similar bid last year was rejected amid concern the letters glorify war.

It failed to get approval from Japan's education ministry, which is needed before the application can continue to Unesco.

At the time, China - which suffered under Japanese rule during the 1930s - condemned the move as "an effort to beautify Japan's history of militaristic aggression".

But Shimoide dismissed that view on Wednesday when he confirmed the city's reapplication to Unesco.

"We believe that our project... represents a significant step in the direction of realising world peace," he told reporters.



_82978659_82978658.jpg

Planes laden with bombs targeted US and Allied warships



_82978655_82978654.jpg

The kamikaze - meaning "divine wind" of the gods - pilots wore honorary ribbons on their final missions


_82978661_82978660.jpg

Minamikyushu Mayor Kampei Shimoide says the pilots' letters highlight the horror of war


The kamikaze missions were launched from Chiran, a tea-farming town that is now part of the southern city of Minamikyushu.

Hundreds of young pilots left in hastily-constructed planes with just enough fuel to reach their targets, Allied warships, in the final months of the war in 1945.

The letters they wrote to loved ones before embarking on their one-way missions now reside in Minamikyushu's Chiran Peace Museum.

"Take courage, forget the past, and find new ways to be happy in the future," one 23-year-old pilot wrote to his fiance before he died.

Museum curator Mutsuo Kuwashiro called the letters "an invaluable record of the horror of war".

Minamikyushu is applying for the letters to be given Unesco's "Memory of the World" status.

Documents already registered include the diary of Anne Frank, the Jewish girl who hid with her family in a secret annexe of her father's business in Nazi-occupied Amsterdam for two years before they were betrayed and arrested in 1944. She died of typhus in the the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp in 1945.


Renowned Historians Urge Abe to Face Wartime Sexual Slavery

Historians condemn Japan’s whitewashing of war crimes
By Ben McGrath
11 May 2015


Last Tuesday, 187 prominent historians from universities in the United States, Canada, Australia and other countries published an open letter criticizing the Japanese government of Shinzo Abe for continuing to whitewash past war crimes.

The statement entitled, “Open Letter in Support of Historians in Japan,” takes aim at the Abe government’s stance on “comfort women,”—a euphemism for women coerced into becoming sex slaves for the Japanese army during the 1930s and 1940s. It calls for the defense of the “freedom of historical inquiry” in Japan and all countries against nationalistic distortions.

Among the signatories were notable historians such as Herbert Bix, professor emeritus at Binghamton University/State University of New York (SUNY), Ezra Vogel, professor emeritus at Harvard University, and Bruce Cumings from the University of Chicago. An earlier letter, released by 19 American historians in February, criticized Abe’s efforts to have references on comfort women altered in American university text books.

The comfort women system was established in the early 1930s. While the first women to be involved were Japanese, as the war spread throughout the Pacific, the military turned to its colonies, coercing poor women with phony promises of good jobs in factories. An estimated 200,000 women from Korea, China, the Philippines, and other Asian nations were then taken to brothels and prevented from leaving. Many committed suicide to escape their barbaric treatment.

The open letter stated: “The undersigned scholars of Japanese studies express our unity with the many courageous historians in Japan seeking an accurate and just history of World War II in Asia.” Historians, as well as journalists in Japan, who have published information on war crimes, have been criticized and in some cases threatened with violence by right-wing nationalists, who claim that comfort women were willing prostitutes and that stating otherwise is an affront to Japanese honor.

Yoshiaki Yoshimi, a leading Japanese historian on comfort women, received phone calls and letters threatening his life after he began publishing his research on comfort women in the 1990s. One such note read, “You must die.” In 1992, Yoshimi discovered extensive documents from the 1930s in the Japanese Ministry of Defense’s library (then called the Defense Agency), showing the military’s role in establishing “comfort stations” (military brothels) throughout Asia.

In January of this year, former Asahi Shimbun journalist Takashi Uemura filed a defamation lawsuit against Bungei Shunju, a publisher, and Tsutomu Nishioka, a right-wing professor at Tokyo Christian University and denier of the crimes against comfort women. Nishioka has accused Uemura of faking the information in his articles.

Uemura stated when he filed his lawsuit: “There is a movement in Japan to stop people who want to shine a light on the dark side of history, on the parts of the war that people don’t want to mention.”

Uemura first became the target of Japanese nationalists in 1991, following two articles he wrote on Kim Hak-sun, who is considered to be the first comfort woman to come forward. Uemura was accused of faking his stories and was attacked as the journalist who “fabricated the comfort woman issue.”

Condemnation of Uemura increased last August, following the Asahi Shimbun’s retraction of a series of articles on comfort women published in the 1980s and 1990s that referenced the accounts of Seiji Yoshida, a former soldier who claimed he had rounded up women during World War II in Korea. Historians had dismissed Yoshida’s story by the early 1990s, while emphasizing the clear evidence of the military’s role in establishing comfort stations.

Neither of Uemura’s articles relied on Yoshida’s story, but the retractions further opened the door for attacks on journalists and academics by right-wing nationalists like Nishioka. Not only was Uemura’s life threatened, but Hokusei University, where he is now employed, received bomb threats. Photos of Uemura’s teenage daughter also appeared online with calls to force the girl to commit suicide.

The Abe government strengthened the nationalists’ claims by calling into doubt the 1993 Kono Statement, a formal yet limited apology for the abuse of comfort women during the war in the Pacific, released by then Chief Cabinet Secretary Yohei Kono. In June 2014, Abe’s government released a report by five “experts” questioning whether women and young girls were coerced or forced into the military brothels.

Tuesday’s letter goes on to say, “[…] historians have unearthed numerous documents demonstrating the military’s involvement in the transfer of women and oversight of brothels. Important evidence also comes from the testimony of victims. Although their stories are diverse and affected by the inconsistencies of memory, the aggregate record they offer is compelling and supported by the official documents as well as by the accounts of soldiers and others.”

The letter also makes clear the fundamental difference between the comfort women system and justifications by Japanese nationalists that prostitution was common in other theaters of war: “Among the many instances of wartime sexual violence and military prostitution in the twentieth century, the ‘comfort women’ system was distinguished by its large scale and systematic management under the military, and by its exploitation of young, poor, and vulnerable women in areas colonized or occupied by Japan.” [emphasis added]

The open letter comes less than a week after Abe, the most right-wing Japanese prime minister in the postwar period, was warmly welcomed by Obama on a trip to the United States where the prime minister also made a speech to a joint session of Congress, the first Japanese premier to do so. The two sides agreed to new security guidelines to allow Japan to take part in the United States’ imperialist wars.

All of this is bound up with the United States’ “pivot to Asia,” designed to economically subordinate and militarily surround China. Japan has been encouraged by Washington to remilitarize and discard its postwar pacifist constitution, as well as to enflame territorial conflicts in the region. During Abe’s recent trip to the US, Obama once again promised to back Japan in a war with China over the disputed Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands in the East China Sea.

While the historians’ letter fails to directly tie historical revisionism to preparations for war, that is the purpose of Abe’s campaign: to whip up Japanese nationalism to condition public opinion, particularly young people, for future conflicts.
 
Last edited:
Japanese PM accused over Potsdam Declaration
CCTV.com
05-21-2015 14:52 BJT
A video clip:
Japanese PM accused over Potsdam Declaration - CCTV News - CCTV.com English

Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has been accused of refusing to accept the wording of a document which forced Japan's surrender in World War 2. The Potsdam Declaration labelled Japan's actions over 70 years ago a "war of aggression".

During a parliamentary debate on Wednesday, the head of the Japanese Communist Party, Kazuo Shii, asked Abe whether he recognized the statement.

"The Potsdam document clearly states in item 6 and 8 that the war waged by Japan was a war of aggression. Prime minister, do you agree in the Potsdam document that the war was wrong," Shii said.

"I did not notice this part of the Potsdam Declaration, so I can't make a comment here," Abe said.

"Please answer my question directly. Do you recognize the Potsdam Declaration," Shii said.

"Just as I said, accepting the Potsdam Declaration was the way Japan ended the war. Japan started to pursue a peaceful path after the war," Abe said.

"The Potsdam Declaration clearly states the war waged by Japan falls into the category of aggression. But the prime minister is reluctant to acknowledge the basic fact," Shii said.

The Potsdam Declaration was issued on July the 26th, 1945, by China, the United States and Britain. It urged Japan to surrender according to specific terms, and adhere to the Cairo Declaration, which had been signed two years earlier. The two documents became the cornerstones of postwar international order.





Japanese PM rejects to admit aggression war ruled by Potsdam Proclamation
Source:Xinhua Published: 2015-5-20 17:19:40

Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe on Wednesday rejected to recognize a rule of the Potsdam Proclamation which said the war Japan waged over 70 years ago is an aggression war, even declined to comment on whether the war was right or wrong.

During a Diet debate between Japanese political parties, the head of the Japanese Communist Party Kazuo Shii asked Abe to make a comment on the Potsdam Proclamation which said the war Japan waged falls into the category of aggression which aimed at occupy the world.

The prime minister rejected to comment on the historic documents which accelerated the end of the WWII and claimed that he did not noticed this part in the proclamation so that he can not make a comment.

Shii further questioned Abe that whether the prime minister recognizes the Potsdam Proclamation, but Abe again shunned from answering, saying that accepting the Potsdam Proclamation was a way that Japan ended the war.

The opposition party leader Shii said the world-recognized document clearly states the war Japan wage was an aggression war and the prime minister is reluctant to acknowledge the basic fact and unwilling to recognize the war was a wrong policy.

Shii said that the Abe's administration spared no effort to exercise the right to collective self-defense so as to help defend the United States, but the country's leader could not make a just decision since he himself even have no idea about the justice and injustice of the war Japan launched in the past.

China, the United States and Britain on July 26 in 1945 declared the Potsdam Proclamation urging Japan to surrender and demand Japan follow the Cairo Declaration. Both of the two documents are the cornerstone of the postwar international order.

The Japanese prime minister said he will issue a statement in the summer that marks the 70th anniversary of the end of WWII, but hinted that he will not offer apology to victim countries of Japan's wartime barbarities. The move triggers ire from Japan's neighboring countries and drew wide criticism at home and abroad.
 
I have heard that there are some that say "Why China cannot let bygone be bygone?"

I would like to say,
how could we forget,
why would we allow ourselves to forget,
given the constant reminder from Japanese leader's antics?

*****
Japan’s First Lady visits controversial Tokyo war shrine - Telegraph
Akie Abe risks raising tensions with China and South Korea after posting Facebook photographs of herself at Yasukuni, where war criminals are among the names remembered
By Danielle Demetriou, Tokyo

3:51AM BST 22 May 2015

The wife of the Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe has visited the controversial Yasukuni war shrine in a move likely to enflame tensions with China and South Korea.

Akie Abe posted photographs of herself on Facebook standing in front of the main shrine building at Yasukuni as well as at Yushukan, its military museum.

Yasukuni has long been a sensitive issue in the region, with Japan’s neighbours often regarding the shrine as a symbol of the nation’s wartime military aggressions.

“I paid a visit to Yasukuni for the first time in a long time,” Mrs Abe wrote in one of the comments.

Yasukuni honours nearly 2.5 million Japanese killed in the Second World War, among them 14 leaders who were later convicted as war criminals, including General Hideki Tojo, the prime minister.

Mrs Abe added: “I feel pain in my chest when I read [soldiers’] letters and farewell notes left for their families.

“I’m really thankful for being able to live in a peaceful, rich Japan and again have come to feel I should do what I can for world peace.”

Yushukan, the shrine’s war museum, is also a controversial establishment, with critics claiming it has supported revisionist accounts of Japan’s history and glorified its militaristic past.

Referring to the visit by Mrs Abe, Liu Jiangyong, professor of international relations and Japan specialist at Tsinghua University in Beijing, told Bloomberg: “The visit is a negative to the current status quo. She is the First Lady, not just a normal visitor or tourist, and this equals Abe’s vicarious or indirect visit.

“It’s hard to speculate on her motives, but it’s strange because she didn’t engage in politics before and gave the impression of a reasonable First Lady.”

Officials from China and South Korea regularly accuse Mr Abe of trying to revive Japanese militarism and whitewash the role played by the Imperial Army in its wartime past.

The First Lady’s visit comes just one week after Mr Abe took a step closer to his vision of easing restrictions on the nation’s pacifist post-war constitution following the cabinet’s approval of new defence bills.

The controversial bills – dubbed the “war legislation” – mark a new defence chapter for the nation, enabling the country’s military to fight abroad for the first time since the Second World War.
 
Back
Top Bottom