What's new

Western Propaganda against Russia regarding Cargo Plane Crash

Madali

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 28, 2015
Messages
2,717
Reaction score
23
Country
Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Location
Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Western media always amuses me. Their most effective propaganda are the ones were they don't necessarily lie, but just use words in such a way to create a certain narrative.

Today a cargo plane crashed in Sudan. This has nothing to do with Russia except it was a Russian made plane.

However, this is the important part, (from RT)
"The plane was owned by the local Allied Services air carrier, and was 45 years old".

I did a quick search, and Allied Services is an Indian company. When American-made planes fall, they don't say "American Plane crashes" (such as the Malaysian incident), but mention the airline or the country the airline belongs to. But when it is about Russia, then "Russia" has to come into the headline.

So now let's look at the western headlines,
Russian cargo plane crashes in South Sudan days after Metrojet disaster in Sinai | Daily Mail Online

Here in the headline not only we read "Russian" as the start of the headline, but it is even linked for the readers to the Egypt incident, even though it has absolutely nothing to do with each other.

But now here are other such headlines from other western news,

At least 25 dead after Russian cargo plane crashes along Nile River in South Sudan | Fox News
Russian-made cargo plane crash in South Sudan leaves 'at least 40 dead' - Mirror Online
South Sudan plane crash: Dozens killed in Russian-built cargo aircraft - Telegraph
Russian cargo plane crashes in South Sudan - Al-Arabiya

You will find the same headlines in Newsweek, Washington Times, in Australian news media, in Israeli, and so forth.

Even the ones who don't have it in their headlines, sneak it into the story,such as CNN which has a fair headline,

but still starts the story with,
South Sudan plane crash kills 15; baby among survivors - CNN.com
"A Russian-built". Even if the reader is lazy and doesn't go through the story, the first thing that will stick in their head is "Russian" & "crash".

Check out the many headlines here:
At least 25 dead after Russian cargo...

When Malaysian Airline became missing, did the headlines start with "American passenger plane"? Even though it was Boeing, and therefore, American made?
 
---

This is the only article I saw that was written objectively,
Crash: Allied Services AN12 at Juba on Nov 4th 2015, impacted hill in initial climb

Even RT's own article wasn't that smart. RT starts their article with "An Antonov-12 Soviet-made cargo plane"

But notice this Aviation paper starts it with,
"An Allied Services Limited Antonov AN-12B, registration EY-406 performing a freight flight from Juba to Paloich "

Notice it starts off with the company that owes the plane, not the country that made it. That's how it is supposed to be reported.
 
well there is an ongoing campaign going on against anything russian , and it's quite easy to figure out how they do this , someone on twitter or facebook comes up with the idea "Russian plane" and then Bam , the entire western world goes Russian Russian , they call them the "white race" for a reason , even though many of them are jews and that the plane Antonov is Ukrainian and not Russian
 
CIA must have done it to harm Russia's positive impact to promote democracy in Syria
 
They have got their paid yesterday, as well as their atitude to what happened in Xingjiang on 7.5 2009
 
Their "free press" is literally paid by the state to print unobjective propaganda.
They pride them self as not state controlled propagand while high and mighty showing pity or even lashing out at others.
Yet these "journalist" will gladly spread lies and jump on any false claim or rumor for money offered by the state.
 
"Their "free press" is literally paid by the state to print unobjective propaganda" and yours, Chinese+Russian "free press" is literally forced by the state to print unobjective propaganda so where is the difference?

We have here the same result => PROPAGANDA on both sides, isn't.
your not better then they
 
Back
Top Bottom