Western media should stop lampooning Pakistan as a dangerous or failed state
* British writer William Dalrymple says Pakistanis chose to back secular democracy in recent polls
WASHINGTON: William Dalrymple, the India-based British writer, has refuted those who have called Pakistan the most dangerous country in the world and a failed state.
Writing in the New York Review of Books, he states, The country I saw in February on a long road trip from Lahore in the Punjab down through rural Sindh to Karachi was not a failed state, or anything even approaching the most dangerous country in the world ... almost beyond repair as the London Spectator recently suggested, joined in its view by The New York Times and The Washington Post among many others. On the contrary, the countryside I passed through was no less peaceful and prosperous than that on the other side of the Indian border; indeed its road networks are far more developed. It was certainly a far cry from the violent instability of post-occupation Iraq or Afghanistan.
Democracy: According to Dalrymple, Though turnout in the election was fairly low, partly owing to fear of suicide bombings, it is clear that Pakistanis have overwhelmingly rejected the military and Islamist options and chosen instead to back secular democracy. And if many stayed at home, no fewer than 36 million Pakistanis braved the threatened bombs to vote in an election, which by South Asian standards was remarkably free of violence, corruption, ballot-stuffing, or booth capturing.
Predicting that the Pakistan Army will not oppose the coalition government, he writes, These developments should now lead commentators to reassess the country that many have long written off and caricatured as a terror-breeding swamp of Islamist iniquity.
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2008\03\31\story_31-3-2008_pg7_40