What's new

Welcome to bjps india,now bjp to train journalists in government propaganda

Above is your interpretation. I see anyone who work for India as nationalist. Anyone bitching about India in US forums or Gulf countries is not acceptable to me. Period.

you should care for humanity, not for nationalism... anything is not acceptable to me.
 
. .
and india becoming known as "suicide capital", "rape capital" and "honor killing capital" doesn't hurt "brand india"... what is this urgent "brand india" you speak of... "oh, chalo, chalo, chalo, brand india aagaya hai"... what is it??

I completely understand your pain. Please do a google and see rape statistics (unfortunately I am using this word) US is number 1, UK is number 2, SA and lot others are up above India (130 Cr population). Indian daughter documentary was designed in way to give bad image of India. BBC ignored Rape jihad in their own backyard where unofficial estimate is 2L girls in UK.

Any thing should be judged on some baseline, perception is not always good and recommended.
 
.
Copying China’s propaganda-based journalism education system will only weaken India’s already-suffering fourth estate.

da473b14-45c8-46ae-8acd-40bc9af0e7a5.jpg



The Narendra Modi administration plans to spend Rs 200 crore ($32 million) to set up a new journalism university, modeled on the Beijing’s massive government-run Communication University of China, officials from the central government said.

“Media institutes in the West are basically schools of journalism,” an unnamed official from the ministry of information and broadcasting told theEconomic Times, explaining, sort of, why China was the model. “We wanted an overarching university and the Beijing model appealed the most to us.”

What the official doesn’t mention is that Chinese state-run media schools like the Communication University of China teach skills like video editing and television broadcasting, but are also a fundamental part of China’s censorship machine. They feed their students a steady diet of Communist Party-approved education, and churn out “journalists” who report government diktats and press conferences unquestioningly. Perhaps to clear up any question about these schools’ role, the Chinese government made officials from the ministry of propaganda heads of the top journalism schools in recent years.

The Communication University of China, with 15,000 students, also teaches art, design, public relations and advertising, and claims to be China’s top-ranked media school. But some journalism schools outside of mainland China don’t recognize classes and credits from the university, because of its reputation as an institute of propaganda.

Journalism graduates from the Communication University of China often go on to Chinese state-run media houses like broadcaster CCTV, which doubles as a mouthpiece for the Communist Party government.

A former producer for CCTV said in a resignation letter in late 2013 that journalists at the television station got more than 1,000 “propaganda orders” a year from the government:
Journalistic integrity and professionalism were nowhere to be found…The voices we hope to broadcast and the attitudes we hope to express have been silenced over and over again.
Unauthorised reporting on officials who control the country is verboten, even when they or their family are amassing great wealth, are hugely corrupt, or their children have been involved in a fatal car crash. So is independent coverage of things like accidents and pollution that have harmed or killed citizens ‒ like trying to root out the cause of Shanghai’s New Year’s Eve stampede that killed 36, or reporting on the companies behind China’s massive pollution problem, or the melamine scandal that killed several infants.

Because China’s media works as a government mouthpiece, it leaves little to no space for conflicting opinions, nor rarely solicits comment from other governments, but it is still the main source of information for 1.3 billion people. Here’s how Chinese state newswire Xinhua recently described Arunachal Pradesh, for example:
The so-called “Arunachal Pradesh” was established largely on the three areas of China’s Tibet ‒ Monyul, Loyul and Lower Tsayul currently under Indian illegal occupation. These three areas, located between the illegal “Mcmahon Line” and the traditional customary boundary between China and India, have always been Chinese territory.

In 1914, the colonialists secretly contrived the illegal “Mcmahon Line” in an attempt to incorporate into India the above-mentioned three areas of Chinese territory. None of the successive Chinese governments have ever recognized this line.

In February 1987, Indian authorities declared the founding of the so-called “Arunachal Pradesh”.
The end result of the government control over media is citizens of China are often uninformed, or misinformed, about events in the country and around the world, even when they can impact their own health and well-being. CCTV and other Chinese state media coverage of the pro-democracy protests that lasted several months in Hong Kong, for example, was practically non-existent, meaning people in Beijing didn’t even know they were going on.

Defying the state’s rules on what you can report in China means you are out of a job, or worse. Chinese state journalists who reported sympathetically, or even expressed sadness, when students were killed in the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests were fired. Outspoken journalist Gao Yu faces life imprisonment, and a former CCTV anchor isrumored to face the death penalty for allegedly helping Western media outlets report on Chinese leaders’ wealth.

India’s constitution guarantees “freedom of speech and expression,” to all citizens, but does not specifically spell out that that applies to the press. State, local and federal officials have stepped up their censorship of social media and other information sources in recent years, citing the constitution’s exemptions of state security and public order. Under prime minister Modi, there are concerns that censorship has extended further and is impacting mainstream media.

Since coming to power in May of last year, Modi has restricted the media’s access to ministers and bureaucrats. On his foreign visits ‒ and he has traveled prolifically ‒ Modi has chosen to take only correspondents from state-owned media outlets. Copying China’s propaganda-based journalism education system will only weaken India’s already-suffering fourth estate further.



Scroll.in - News. Politics. Culture.

@jamahir @he-man

I have no complaints if it is modeled after the Chinese university
 
.
you should care for humanity, not for nationalism... anything is not acceptable to me.

Please give this gyan to terrorist organisation/ maoist who are killing peoples, not to one who want to defend country from within as well as external. Any one irrespective of job profile, religion, region etc should participate.
 
.
I like the hysteric title of the thread.

The hysteria in it tells that this is the right track, though I don't have much of a BJP thing, other than respect for our current PM as a national leader.

Indeed anything that these commies & Socialists appose is a good thing
 
. .
Please give this gyan to terrorist organisation/ maoist who are killing peoples, not to one who want to defend country from within as well as external. Any one irrespective of job profile, religion, region etc should participate.

1. if the sanghis ditch sanghi-ism and adopt socialism, only the western bloc will bother india, not others... so adopt socialism and join humanity... any enemy of western bloc should be proud of that label.

2a. you speak of maoists... did you take their recommendation on how india should be... why has the government establishment put 100,000+ soldiers/fighters to kill 5000+ maoists?? this is crime against humanity.

2b. the maoists are not "killing people" nor are they raiding discos and parks and beating up ladies.

3. you speak of "terrorists"... fine, kill the mullahs... but i also want indian air force and army bombaring sangh parivar shakas and offices and the police raiding houses of every sanghi terrorist or sympathizer.

do this and demonstrate your loyalty to human values.

vande mataram !

kindly change your signature to that, and also your profile-picture... you are no atheist or socialist.
 
.
1. if the sanghis ditch sanghi-ism and adopt socialism, only the western bloc will bother india, not others... so adopt socialism and join humanity... any enemy of western bloc should be proud of that label.

2. you speak of maoists... did you ask take their recommendation on how india should be... why has the government establishment put 100,000+ soldiers/fighters to kill 5000+ maoists??

3. you speak of "terrorists"... fine, kill the mullahs... but i also want indian air force and army bombaring sangh parivar shakas and offices and the police raiding houses of every sanghi terrorist or sympathizer.

do this and demonstrate your loyalty to human values.



kindly change your signature to that, and also your profile-picture... you are no atheist or socialist.
you speak of "terrorists"... fine, kill the mullahs... but i also want indian air force and army bombaring sangh parivar shakas and offices and the police raiding houses of every sanghi terrorist or sympathizer!
images.jpeg
 
. . .
MSM and Adarsh Liberal now will have more patriotic journalist to challenge their anti India mission !!!

Great move need more pass out every year
 
.
LOL Now Bhakts will be manufactured in a much more systematic manner... kudos to the present government
 
Last edited:
.
MSM and Adarsh Liberal now will have more patriotic journalist to challenge their anti India mission !!!

the excuse used by every dictatorship in history... and as always for dictatorships in modern times, they are supported by the western bloc governments and militaries.

india has in its own slow way slipped into dictatorship and insanity.

the people of india must throw away their uncaring life of jobs, kirket and family to bring sanity to india, to join the progress made by rest of humanity.
 
Last edited:
.
Meanwhile in a "Secular" news magazine

Should India Win The World Cup?
India has stormed into the semi-finals of the ICC Cricket World Cup and are now a step closer to the coveted 'Champions' title for the third time. As most of India roots for the boys in blue, sociologist Ashis Nandy feels that winning the World Cup might just make India's macho and hyper masculine nationalism more intense. Over the last few months, there seems to have been an effort to make a pluralistic India into a homogenized Hindu state where the space for dissent has diminished, churches are regularly 'robbed', talk of religious conversion is rampant, and there's banning of many things, including beef. In case India wins the World Cup, the fear is that majoritarian nationalism will become more aggressive.


So, do you think it is a good idea for India to win the World Cup?

Of course, it is. Why mix sports and politics? If the players have worked hard, they deserve to win.
What's wrong with you? Indian team winning the World Cup is a matter of pride for the entire nation, minorities included. Every Indian should be proud if the team does well.
No. Sports is often an expression of vigorous, in-your-face nationalism which may not be healthy for a society as diverse as ours.
Who cares?


Should India Win The World Cup? : Outlook Opinion Poll
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom