What's new

We were originally Hindus, says Bangladeshi author Sharbari Zohra Ahmed

CTG has a great admixture and it being a port city really shows. Each Bengali is different, one could trace his roots back to Allahabad in India and the other could be a pure North Eastern/Assamese mix.
 
Well, why doesn’t she revert and then enjoy the trappings of female infanticides and sex selective abortion. How feminist of Hindu culture!
 
We were originally Hindus, says Bangladeshi author Sharbari Zohra Ahmed
Sharbari-Zohra-Ahmedjpg

Author Sharbari Zohra Ahmed during an even in Bengaluru recently. | Photo Credit: Sampath Kumar G.P.
PTI
KOLKATA 01 JANUARY 2020 10:47 IST
UPDATED: 01 JANUARY 2020 11:04 IST

The people of her country are more alike than different from Indians, she says

U.S-based Bangladeshi author and playwright Sharbari Zohra Ahmed feels that the people of the country of her origin are more alike than different from Indians as they were originally Hindus.

But Bangladeshis now want to forget their Hindu roots, said the author, who was born in Dhaka and moved to the United States when she was just three weeks old.

Ahmed, who is the co-writer of the Season 1 of Quantico, a popular American television drama thriller series starring Priyanka Chopra, rues that her identity as a Bengali is getting lost in Bangladesh due to the influence of right-wing religious groups.

“How can Bangladesh deny its Hindu heritage? We were originally Hindus. Islam came later,” Ms. Ahmed said while speaking to PTI here recently.

“The British exploited us, stole from us and murdered us,” she said about undivided India, adding that the colonialists destroyed the thriving Muslin industry in Dhaka.

Ms. Ahmed said the question of her belief and identity in Bangladesh, where the state religion in Islam, has prompted her to write her debut novel Dust Under Her Feet.

The British exploitation of India and the country’s partition based on religion has also featured in her novel in a big way.

Ms. Ahmed calls Winston Churchill, the British prime minister during World War II, a “racist”.

“He took the rice from Bengal to feed his soldiers and didn’t care when he was told about that.

“During my research, I learnt that two million Bengalis died in the artificial famine that was created by him. When people praise Churchill, it is like praising Hitler to the Jews. He was horrible,” she said.

The author said her novel is an effort to tell the readers what actually happened.

“Great Britain owes us three trillion dollars. You have to put in inflation. Yet, they (the British) still have a colonial mentality and white colonisation is on the rise again,” Ms. Ahmed, who was in the city to promote her novel, said.

The novel is based in Kolkata, then Calcutta, during World War II when American soldiers were coming to the city in large numbers.

The irony was that while these American soldiers were nice to the locals, they used to segregate the so-called “black” soldiers, the novelist said.

“Calcutta was a cosmopolitan and the rest of the world needs to know how the city’s people were exploited, its treasures looted, people divided and hatred instilled in them,” she said.

‘Direct Action Day’
“Kolkata was my choice of place for my debut novel since my mother was born here. She witnessed the ‘Direct Action Day’ when she was a kid and was traumatised. She saw how a Hindu was killed by Muslims near her home in Park Circus area (in the city),” Ms. Ahmed said.

Direct Action Day, also known as the Great Calcutta Killings, was a massive communal riot in the city on August 16, 1946 that continued for the next few days.

Thousands of people were killed in the violence that ultimately paved the way for the partition of India.

Dust Under Her Feet is set in the Calcutta of the 1940s and Ahmed in her novel examines the inequities wrought by racism and colonialism.

The story is of young and lovely Yasmine Khan, a doyenne of the nightclub scene in Calcutta.

When the US sets up a large army base in the city to fight the Japanese in Burma, Yasmine spots an opportunity.

The nightclub is where Yasmine builds a family of singers, dancers, waifs and strays.

Every night, the smoke-filled club swarms with soldiers eager to watch her girls dance and sing.

Yasmine meets American soldier Lt Edward Lafaver in the club and for all her cynicism, finds herself falling helplessly for a married man who she is sure will never choose her over his wife.

Outside, the city lives in constant fear of Japanese bombardment at night. An attack and a betrayal test Yasmine’s strength and sense of control and her relationship with Edward.

Ms. Ahmed teaches creative writing in the MFA programme in Manhattanville College and is artist-in-residence in Sacred Heart University’s graduate film and television programme.

www.thehindu.com/books/books-authors/we-were-originally-hindus-says-bangladeshi-author-sharbari-zohra-ahmed/article30449150.ece/amp/
desperate for free publicity and sell books!
 
A national daily in India published a story where a random person claimed that her ancestors were hindus... Are we running out of stories these days. Do these even get sold?
 
Could not be said better.... Bangladeshies are a mongrel nation of many bloodlines particularly the muslims. Only thing that binds is Islam, language and a broad perspective.
However, Mongrel is a derogatory term for any group of people. We can better attribute the term "A mixed group" of people in Muslim Bengal. But, it is certainly not unique for Bengal. This phenomenon has gone through centuries among all the groups of people on this Earth in the pre-historic as well as historical times.

For example, in the USA most of the whites have been mixed with each other after the immigration a few centuries ago. Blacks were not basically a homogeneous group of people as well. Rather, they were brought from many different parts of Africa. They became mixed among themselves as well as with whites during the course of time.

Many similar things happened in the past throughout the world. People moved out to another place and mixed with the local people during the course of time. So, we do not have to derogate us. By reading the political history (1203 to 1757) of Bengal a person will know that except Raja Ganesh (a Brahmin) all the Maliks, Sultans, Subedars and Nawabs including Alivardy Khan/Sirajuddoulah were of foreign descent. His son, Jitmal (Jodu), had to accept Islam to continue his father's line.

It was certainly not that the outsiders came alone and declared themselves the Sovereigns of Bengal. Many thousand others accompanied them to seek a better living. They have mixed with the local converted Muslims gradually.

People now do not really know who is what, and whose forefathers were what. They live in the present homogeneous society bound by one religion and one language.
 
Some of the culture we retained from our past religions in bengal is good, I.e like communal tolerance.

Some of the culture we retained is bad, like in punjab, when some Muslims still continue to retain their cast status.

End of. Some good and some bad.
 
Most of the murdered twats in 71 were the same tbh I reckon, all some “poets” and very few actual intellectuals that would contribute to country development
You are taking away the only BAL political asset, the '71 intellectuals. Better not to speak such things aloud when you are in Golden Bengal.

Its true if you believe the world is just a few thousand years old. Well before Hinduism there were more religions in the long line of history.
Why is she stuck with Hinduism ?
But, she says so because she wants to sell her stupid book on both sides of the border.
 
Some of the culture we retained from our past religions in bengal is good, I.e like communal tolerance.

Some of the culture we retained is bad, like in punjab, when some Muslims still continue to retain their cast status.

End of. Some good and some bad.
We did not have caste status is because we were mainly convert from Buddhist..
 
But Bangladeshis now want to forget their Hindu roots
even indian muslims are not interested in it :lol:

rues that her identity as a Bengali is getting lost in Bangladesh due to the influence of right-wing religious groups.
she is saying this sitting in india of all places, NRC, CAB, Kashmir, Babri masjeed, Detention Camps, shooting and killing protesters, butcher of Gujrat PM hello???
 
We were originally Hindus, says Bangladeshi author Sharbari Zohra Ahmed
Sharbari-Zohra-Ahmedjpg

Author Sharbari Zohra Ahmed during an even in Bengaluru recently. | Photo Credit: Sampath Kumar G.P.
PTI
KOLKATA 01 JANUARY 2020 10:47 IST
UPDATED: 01 JANUARY 2020 11:04 IST

The people of her country are more alike than different from Indians, she says

U.S-based Bangladeshi author and playwright Sharbari Zohra Ahmed feels that the people of the country of her origin are more alike than different from Indians as they were originally Hindus.

But Bangladeshis now want to forget their Hindu roots, said the author, who was born in Dhaka and moved to the United States when she was just three weeks old.

Ahmed, who is the co-writer of the Season 1 of Quantico, a popular American television drama thriller series starring Priyanka Chopra, rues that her identity as a Bengali is getting lost in Bangladesh due to the influence of right-wing religious groups.

“How can Bangladesh deny its Hindu heritage? We were originally Hindus. Islam came later,” Ms. Ahmed said while speaking to PTI here recently.

“The British exploited us, stole from us and murdered us,” she said about undivided India, adding that the colonialists destroyed the thriving Muslin industry in Dhaka.

Ms. Ahmed said the question of her belief and identity in Bangladesh, where the state religion in Islam, has prompted her to write her debut novel Dust Under Her Feet.

The British exploitation of India and the country’s partition based on religion has also featured in her novel in a big way.

Ms. Ahmed calls Winston Churchill, the British prime minister during World War II, a “racist”.

“He took the rice from Bengal to feed his soldiers and didn’t care when he was told about that.

“During my research, I learnt that two million Bengalis died in the artificial famine that was created by him. When people praise Churchill, it is like praising Hitler to the Jews. He was horrible,” she said.

The author said her novel is an effort to tell the readers what actually happened.

“Great Britain owes us three trillion dollars. You have to put in inflation. Yet, they (the British) still have a colonial mentality and white colonisation is on the rise again,” Ms. Ahmed, who was in the city to promote her novel, said.

The novel is based in Kolkata, then Calcutta, during World War II when American soldiers were coming to the city in large numbers.

The irony was that while these American soldiers were nice to the locals, they used to segregate the so-called “black” soldiers, the novelist said.

“Calcutta was a cosmopolitan and the rest of the world needs to know how the city’s people were exploited, its treasures looted, people divided and hatred instilled in them,” she said.

‘Direct Action Day’
“Kolkata was my choice of place for my debut novel since my mother was born here. She witnessed the ‘Direct Action Day’ when she was a kid and was traumatised. She saw how a Hindu was killed by Muslims near her home in Park Circus area (in the city),” Ms. Ahmed said.

Direct Action Day, also known as the Great Calcutta Killings, was a massive communal riot in the city on August 16, 1946 that continued for the next few days.

Thousands of people were killed in the violence that ultimately paved the way for the partition of India.

Dust Under Her Feet is set in the Calcutta of the 1940s and Ahmed in her novel examines the inequities wrought by racism and colonialism.

The story is of young and lovely Yasmine Khan, a doyenne of the nightclub scene in Calcutta.

When the US sets up a large army base in the city to fight the Japanese in Burma, Yasmine spots an opportunity.

The nightclub is where Yasmine builds a family of singers, dancers, waifs and strays.

Every night, the smoke-filled club swarms with soldiers eager to watch her girls dance and sing.

Yasmine meets American soldier Lt Edward Lafaver in the club and for all her cynicism, finds herself falling helplessly for a married man who she is sure will never choose her over his wife.

Outside, the city lives in constant fear of Japanese bombardment at night. An attack and a betrayal test Yasmine’s strength and sense of control and her relationship with Edward.

Ms. Ahmed teaches creative writing in the MFA programme in Manhattanville College and is artist-in-residence in Sacred Heart University’s graduate film and television programme.

www.thehindu.com/books/books-authors/we-were-originally-hindus-says-bangladeshi-author-sharbari-zohra-ahmed/article30449150.ece/amp/

La iqra ha Fid-deen ( Nahi koi Zabar Deen mein)

Anyway, I think she already reverted. She has a red dot on her forehead.
 
Why are so many people triggered? She just said that her ancestors were Hindus. What's wrong in that? Indonesia is proud of its Hindu ancestry as well. Indonesians consider the Majapahit kingdom as one of the greatest kingdoms and it was a Hindu kingdom. Indonesians have the Garuda airlines as well.
Hatred for Hindus is clearly visible over here.
 
Why are so many people triggered? She just said that her ancestors were Hindus. What's wrong in that? Indonesia is proud of its Hindu ancestry as well. Indonesians consider the Majapahit kingdom as one of the greatest kingdoms and it was a Hindu kingdom. Indonesians have the Garuda airlines as well.
Hatred for Hindus is clearly visible over here.

Taslima Nasrin got kicked out of BD for her views, just as you WOULD.

Why are so many people triggered? She just said that her ancestors were Hindus. What's wrong in that? Indonesia is proud of its Hindu ancestry as well. Indonesians consider the Majapahit kingdom as one of the greatest kingdoms and it was a Hindu kingdom. Indonesians have the Garuda airlines as well.
Hatred for Hindus is clearly visible over here.

Because Hindus were known as being two-faced and snakes during the miserable colonial era. Many of your Hindu Chowdhuris bent their backs, many of your zamindars were traitors whilst the likes of Hada and Wada Miah were drawing their swords out to the Scotsmen and Eng men that came.
 
Because Hindus were known as being two-faced and snakes during the miserable colonial era. Many of your Hindu Chowdhuris bent their backs, many of your zamindars were traitors etc.
Hate for Idolaters is nothing new. No point hiding it behind Zamindars, and don't tell me Mughals let Hindu Zamindars take advantage of Muslims.
 
You are taking away the only BAL political asset, the '71 intellectuals. Better not to speak such things aloud when you are in Golden Bengal.
I mean it’s not for me to say who’s actually intellectual and who’s not... people can look up
Many were just writers, journalist etc... there were some engineers and doctors and like I said many were cut off the list because they had friends in Pakistan military and just mind their own business in Dhaka.
Most of my family from both sides haven’t experienced any war to speak of... only one or two who actually went to fight could say there was war otherwise Dhaka was pretty secured until it’s eventual fall
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom