@My-Analogous
Your calm demeanor and discussion-friendly aptitude is noted. Few have the mindset to carry these kind of discussions with maturity. Really appreciated.
Actually in Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan, we see that US now fail to contain any land and that is very big question mark and when it come to Pakistan, our people are more dangerous then others and that is the point which scares everyone
American mission is not to
colonize these countries but to
reform them; towards this end, they toppled
Taliban-led regime in Afghanistan [circa 2001] and
Saddam-led regime in Iraq [circa 2003] in order to pave way for 'democratic reforms' in these countries respectively. Additionally, they want to make sure that these countries will not turn into incubators of "terrorism."
US committed a large force* to occupy Iraq during the period (2003 - 2009) and another** to occupy Afghanistan during the years (2010 - 2013). Troops levels remain low otherwise.
*100,000 troops (and above)
**60,000 troops (and above)
FYI:
http://www.derechos.org/nizkor/iraq/doc/costwar1.jpg
Keep in mind that large-scale military deployments (and operations with high-tech equipment) in
distant lands are
logistically-intensive and
economically costly commitments.
---
We might offer resistance to an 'occupying force' but not in
organized manner.
Individualism has taken roots, spirituality factor is in decline and huge number of people are into luxuries these days. We do not have shortage of
sell-outs either.
Some observations:-
1. Wherever TTP arrived, it managed to subjugate
locals easily.
2. Criminal elements terrorized
Karachi for years.
Not impressed.
Conversely - I don't think that a foreign entity would enjoy its stay in Pakistan for indefinite period. Humanitarian crises might skyrocket and prospects of provincial splits might increase tenfold.
Nation-rebuilding might not be an attainable goal here, accordingly.
