Was Einstein wrong?

[Kyle Sun]

Gravitons have not been proven to exist as of yet. Gravity as a result of the curvature of space-time is not yet a proven concept.

But we have found many particles which were prophesied according to the modern physics theory .
I do not know whether Einstein is 100% right .What I am sure is human has deeper understanding of our world because of his theory.

We should not think like a KMT lovingTaiwanese. Those people were meant for failure in life.

I am not following you. I do not understand what you are talking about.

 

[Aepsilons]

The concept of spacetime combines space and time to a single abstract "space", for which a unified coordinate system is chosen. Typically three spatial dimensions (length, width, height), and one temporal dimension (time) are required. Dimensions are independent components of a coordinate grid needed to locate a point in a certain defined "space".

 

[kbd-raaf]

But we have found many particles which were prophesied according to the modern physics theory .
I do not know whether Einstein is 100% right .What I am sure is human has deeper understanding of our world because of his theory.

Yep, most certainly. He may not be 100% on the ball, his theories will likely get revised over time. The man was a god in his time and for many years since.

The concept of spacetime combines space and time to a single abstract "space", for which a unified coordinate system is chosen. Typically three spatial dimensions (length, width, height), and one temporal dimension (time) are required. Dimensions are independent components of a coordinate grid needed to locate a point in a certain defined "space".

Nihonjin-ji I gotta say, this was a post utterly unrelated to the discussion going on above Imagine a bunch of guys having a discussion about space time and another joins and gives them the definition.

 

[Aepsilons]

Yep, most certainly. He may not be 100% on the ball, his theories will likely get revised over time. The man was a god in his time and for many years since.



Nihonjin-ji I gotta say, this was a post utterly unrelated to the discussion going on above Imagine a bunch of guys having a discussion about space time and another joins and gives them the definition.

Wanted to interject and provide a great video , Kbd-sama.

 

[kbd-raaf]

Wanted to interject and provide a great video , Kbd-sama.

Fair enough

 

[Aepsilons]

But we have found many particles which were prophesied according to the modern physics theory .

I suggest we not use subjectivistic terminology such as 'prophesy' or anything related to magic, religion, and metaphysical when in discussion about physics. There really is little room for such.

 

[T-123456]

If it is ''flat'',then how do we explain black holes?

 

[Aepsilons]

If it is ''flat'',then how do we explain black holes?

hehehe!

 

[T-123456]

hehehe!

Doppler effect,regarding time(if there is any relation)?

 

[911]

The concept of spacetime combines space and time to a single abstract "space", for which a unified coordinate system is chosen. Typically three spatial dimensions (length, width, height), and one temporal dimension (time) are required. Dimensions are independent components of a coordinate grid needed to locate a point in a certain defined "space".

This is more like representing the magnitude of gravity with distance. If gravity really bend space then it should bend from each and every direction and not just one plane unlike shown in the fig.

Doppler effect,regarding time(if there is any relation)?

These are two different theories, in one time slows as we move faster and in other more gravity slower time.

 

[Aepsilons]

Doppler effect,regarding time(if there is any relation)?

In order for an object to form a black hole it has to be compressed below a certain radius, Schwarzschild radius.

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

Einstine

"Let me steal work from other scientist , summarize it , call it my own"

Media , makes books and movies to promote Einstine while ignoring the work of other scientist

Science agencies , ignore the fact they normally discredit research if it does not qoutes past work references however they accept Mr Einstine's copied work

Students in international universities are expelled from university for 1 year if they make this mistake

If any other scientist had released work with out proper credits his work would be rejected
and he would be made fun of , and infact talked badly about

Theory of relativity , never actually proven by Mr Einstine i.e its mere speculative work

Most theories , are always proven prior to being accepted yet Mr Einstine's work suppose to be perfect yet with no proof (admitted by himself , he could not prove it)

Even the E=MC2 is stolen formula from other scientist who were already aware of it, while they were busy with "fraction" level accuracy , Mr Einstine copied the work nicely went to his friends who published it and made it look like his work

 

[Kyle Sun]

I suggest we not use subjectivistic terminology such as 'prophesy' or anything related to magic, religion, and metaphysical when in discussion about physics. There really is little room for such.

No, physics has very close relation with "prophesy".

We guess and then we prove it . Scientists make some theory and scientists do some particular experiment to prove it .

Periodic table of elements and antimatter are the typical example .

 

[Aepsilons]

No, physics has very close relation with "prophesy".

To prophesy is to predict something or to utter something inspired by one's god. Magical utterance of the divine should not be intertwined with empiricism and science. Theology and Science should not be combined; the two should remain entirely separate.

 

[Adecypher]

Great post; I know esteemed PDF members will chime in with their thoughts, research and explanations on the OP topic...I am taking baby steps by watching this video below: