War between Saudi Arabia and Iran may happen in just 10-15yrs – Crown Prince

[Serpentine]

Too much ignorance and but hurt to answer..
Just say who has allowed the Mamluks to those high positions before they took over.. As for Persia it was a fire worshiping nation..who got its ***handed to it by 200 Spartans..let alone the Arabs who conquered it and converted it to Islam.. but continue your daydreaming.. it might help your but Hurt..

Another Arab supermacist with zero knowledge on history, but insisting to appear as an expert of history. You are not, just don't try so hard, it doesn't work like that.

To be able to talk history, first and foremost, one needs to put away bigotry and bias, both of which you have in all of your posts.

 

[Muhammed45]

Too much ignorance and but hurt to answer..
Just say who has allowed the Mamluks to those high positions before they took over.. As for Persia it was a fire worshiping nation..who got its ***handed to it by 200 Spartans..let alone the Arabs who conquered it and converted it to Islam.. but continue your daydreaming.. it might help your but Hurt..

Turks built Arab states. Ottomans built but you traitors ruined them in favor of your American big daddy.

All of Arab countries have signs of Ottoman empires buildings, ports, mosques, castles, etc were gifted by Ottomans to Arabs, you faggot, what have you done in Islamic world after your so called freedom of Ottoman colonization? Turks are Muslims and till they they had control of you rebels, Palestine was an Islamic land which was gifted to Brits by Saudi Kings.

You produced ISIS, Al Qaeda, Nusra, etc, every single terror group has a sign of that Arabic saudi e regime, yeah father of Arabs. When you decide to open your big mouth full of shit and throw insults at other members of the Muslim world that have high respect to Rashidun, imams and the holy prophet, try to use non existent brain cells, at least pretend to use. No muslim is wishing for being an Arab, since it's pathetic nowadays, since you are a living shame to every living Muslim and all the heritages of Muslims.

 

[The SC]

Another Arab supermacist with zero knowledge on history, but insisting to appear as an expert of history. You are not, just don't try so hard, it doesn't work like that.

To be able to talk history, first and foremost, one needs to put away bigotry and bias, both of which you have in all of your posts.

I just bring facts.. there seem to be different versions of history for some.. Look very well who brings bigotry and bias here.. not me for sure..but when guys start insults.. they should expect to receive the same treatment.. either bring universal history with all it content or not bring it at all..that is what I am trying to do here.. not bits and parts to suite me or someone else..

 

[Sharpshooter12]

What about the Seljuqs? not the same as the Mamluks? even the Persians.. who has conquered them first.. no Role of the Arabs? please revise history before talking..

Dude seriously why are you diverting discussion again and again, you said "Arabs who have handed Khilafat to the The Turks", I mentioned Arabs did not handed over khilafat to Ottomans and had no role whatsoever in their coming to power. Why are you bringing what role Arabs played in Saljuk and Mamuluk ascension to power(even there you are skewing the facts but anyway), it was Ottomans who took the caliphate, do you have anything to say about the role of Arabs in bringing Ottomans to power? If not then how can you say that Arabs handed over Khilafat to Turks, they took it from Arabs when Arabs were no longer worthy of it.

Your beliefs are actually stupid.

And who gives you the right to say that. This is a defense forum, you can discuss politics, foreign policy etc but this is not a platform for religious discussion and you should keep in mind that the country of origin for this forum is of Sunni majority who share the same belief that you are calling stupid.

 

[The SC]

Dude seriously why are you diverting discussion again and again, you said "Arabs who have handed Khilafat to the The Turks", I mentioned Arabs did not handed over khilafat to Ottomans and had no role whatsoever in their coming to power. Why are you bringing what role Arabs played in Saljuk and Mamuluk ascension to power(even there you are skewing the facts but anyway), it was Ottomans who took the caliphate, do you have anything to say about the role of Arabs in bringing Ottomans to power? If not then how can you say that Arabs handed over Khilafat to Turks, they took it from Arabs when Arabs were no longer worthy of it.

Dude, where was Khilafat in the first place? Use some logic..
Arabs stayed in the power circles all along throughout the Islamic Empire.. it is a fact you can find in any history book..

 

[Ceylal]

Dude, where was Khilafat in the first place? Use some logic..
Arabs stayed in the power circles all along throughout the Islamic Empire.. it is a fact you can find in any history book..

A storybook written for the Sauds...

 

[Sharpshooter12]

Dude, where was Khilafat in the first place? Use some logic..
Arabs stayed in the power circles all along throughout the Islamic Empire.. it is a fact you can find in any history book..

hahaha you sir are hilarious.

 

[The SC]

hahaha you sir are hilarious.

I am..if logic and facts are..

 

[Divergent]

Oh brother

 

[925boy]

Sorry, now you are taking ignorance, see the October war.. and from 67 to 73..56 was England, France and Usrael, and 48 was the whole western world, mainly England arming and helping the Usraelis..What could you do about that..in 1973 Usrael was on the verge of collapsing wasn't it for the forceful intervention of the US..the Iranians were no where to see in this.. Iraq alone could take care of Iran for 8 years.. hope you have learned a thing or two.. and please, before quoting me, educate yourself first..

wikipedia says the "october war"aka yom kippur war was an israeli military victory. 67, to 73 were alsp israeli military victory. 1had partial jordanian victory. well, that US ,british help MADE osrael not lose,which is exactly my point. you are claiming moral right(implying you won becuase israel had help and you dodnt)but the history books have stated permanently that you lost. hezbollah on 2006 was the forst time in modern history an arab force didnt lose to israel.pls show me limks/documents showing arabs won against israel in those wars you mentioned.tbh i dont think israel can beat egypt today.but that is ONLY of US takes the muzzle off egypt.

 

[The SC]

wikipedia says the "october war"aka yom kippur war was an israeli military victory. 67, to 73 were alsp israeli military victory. 1had partial jordanian victory. well, that US ,british help MADE osrael not lose,which is exactly my point. you are claiming moral right(implying you won becuase israel had help and you dodnt)but the history books have stated permanently that you lost. hezbollah on 2006 was the forst time in modern history an arab force didnt lose to israel.pls show me limks/documents showing arabs won against israel in those wars you mentioned.tbh i dont think israel can beat egypt today.but that is ONLY of US takes the muzzle off egypt.

There are many threads on this subject.. you better refer to them.. some are very detailed ones.. I am sure you will learn a thing or two.. you can quote me from there.. this is off topic here.. and stop trolling.. you seem very hurt by the word Arab.. please keep your pain for yourself.... and know that Wikipedia is not deep knowledge.. more like some shallow preliminary information that anyone can contribute to..

 

[925boy]

There are many threads on this subject.. you better refer to them.. some are very detailed ones.. I am sure you will learn a thing or two.. you can quote me from there.. this is off topic here.. and stop trolling.. you seem very hurt by the word Arab.. please keep your pain for yourself.... and know that Wikipedia is not deep knowledge.. more like some shallow preliminary information that anyone can contribute to..

ok i wont derail majorly anymore. you seem hurt by my assertions actually. you challenged what i initially said, but your arguments were untrue.after that,you now come at me with emotional stuff.pls dont get personal emotional with me. im not a bigot,but yes i have biases,just like you too. i got you on this argument bro.there is a pattern.refer me to what?u cant counter the argument logically anymore and prove you are right,but thats ok. take chill pill.

Iran would actually love a Saudi attack,today or in 15yrs.no doubt.

 

[The SC]

ok i wont derail majorly anymore. you seem hurt by my assertions actually. you challenged what i initially said, but your arguments were untrue.after that,you now come at me with emotional stuff.pls dont get personal emotional with me. im not a bigot,but yes i have biases,just like you too. i got you on this argument bro.there is a pattern.refer me to what?u cant counter the argument logically anymore and prove you are right,but thats ok. take chill pill.

Iran would actually love a Saudi attack,today or in 15yrs.no doubt.

You are obviously talking about yourself and how much pain you feel.. When one seeks the truth..he never feels bad , only the ignorants will be emotional and try to demonise others.. you are being a testimony to this..

Iran is no fool to want to see all its infrastructure destroyed and its people suffering more than now.. even if it can cause damage to others..

 

[Fenasi Kerim]

Too much ignorance and but hurt to answer..
Just say who has allowed the Mamluks to those high positions before they took over.. As for Persia it was a fire worshiping nation..who got its ***handed to it by 200 Spartans..let alone the Arabs who conquered it and converted it to Islam.. but continue your daydreaming.. it might help your but Hurt..

Wow I knew you was an Arab retard but this post is another level of gold, you win the special person of PDF award.

 

[bsruzm]

I am..if logic and facts are..

They slap you right and left, where are your Arab brother's? It's no fun without @Saif al-Arab likes. His oiling the wheels threads, I miss.