Windjammer
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2009
- Messages
- 41,319
- Reaction score
- 181
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So the bold parts and the one underlined does raises questions that what a journalists has to do with officials from FATA secretariat and such frequent visits that also started in the last 2 months, and naming 2 officials from Pakistan is also a very serious issue, if it hadn't been true the names of these 2 officials would have not been revealed, but after making it public means there is some hard evidence with the intelligence agencies.
The accusation was made by a news paper. As far as I know, no accusations were ever made by any official agencies. Because of the sensitiveness and from past history of journalists being killed by terrorists, the news paper should have taken a conservative approach. Instead they have put his life in danger by making accusations based on activities which sound like what journalists do during investigations.
It is quiet possible that for legitimate or illegitimate reasons, intelligence agencies did not like the idea of him investigating this area but had no proof with which they could have charged him. All they had to do was plant a story in the news paper which suggested that he was a spy. The journalist and his news paper had to pull him out fearing for his life. This is intimidation.
The dilemma is when these Westerners come to Countries like Pakistan, all their code of ethics go through the window as they trample the rules and laws of subject country. Just to achieve a spectacular this guy didn't heed any official warnings which can only be termed as professional misconduct. If this guy had met same fate as Danial Pearl, then all fingers near and far would have accused GOP for not giving protection to Foreigners .
The accusation was made by a news paper. As far as I know, no accusations were ever made by any official agencies. Because of the sensitiveness and from past history of journalists being killed by terrorists, the news paper should have taken a conservative approach. Instead they have put his life in danger by making accusations based on activities which sound like what journalists do during investigations.
It is quiet possible that for legitimate or illegitimate reasons, intelligence agencies did not like the idea of him investigating this area but had no proof with which they could have charged him. All they had to do was plant a story in the news paper which suggested that he was a spy. The journalist and his news paper had to pull him out fearing for his life. This is intimidation.
I agree with you. This guy could have actually been asking for it.
In this case though, Dr Mazari's newspaper behaved very irresponsibly.
I agree with you. This guy could have actually been asking for it.
In this case though, Dr Mazari's newspaper behaved very irresponsibly.
In fact Dr. Mazari did what any responsible citizen would do, that is to expose activities against the state as this journalist was breaching his professional responsibilities, hence some one had to draw the line.
Kudos to the Doc.
Reporting that some one is possibly breaking the law is very different to making allegations of him being a CIA/Mossad spy. The article sensationalised the matter resulting in someone's life being in danger.