What's new

Vote bank politics responsible for infiltration from Bangladesh: Meghalaya DGP

I personally think after suffering a defeat in the whole country wide mayor election to BNP AL will be cautious enough to implement any bhartai appeasement deal...

First lets your Bharati Dalal's stop the dalali. Then we will talk.

N regarding not following UN order of referendum since 1947 you just exposed to the fact that you are violating UN law and regurgitation and cause of this India will be block from becoming a permanent member in the UN...

N IT ALSO PROVED REALITY AND TRUE COLOR ABOUT THE SO CALLED BIGGEST DEMOCRACY ABOUT THE WORLD AND MAKING THE FACT CLEAR THAT YOUR INDIA IS OCCUPYING KASHMIR ILLEGALLY AGAINST THE WILL OF THE KASHMIRI PEOPLE OTHERWISE BHARTIS WILL HAVE NO PROBLEM TO CONDUCT A REFERENDUM AND HUMAN RIGHT VIOLATION WAS OCCURRING THERE REGULARLY ON A REGULAR BASIS.

:lazy: As if we care about your opinion.
 
.
Really..cheap talk!! is that the best counter you can come up with..what a waste!!..I was hoping you guys could have come up with some counter claims.

Extra ordinary claim requires extra ordinary evidence. I am not the one making claims here. You are. The burden is on you. "We all know millions of illegal Bangladeshis in India" is not an argument or well documented source, its a pile of garbage.
 
.
.

Migration by last residence from neighbouring countries

In 2001 Census about 5.1 million persons reported as migrant by last
residence from across the International border.

About 97% of these migrants by last residence were from the eight neighbouring countries (including Afghanistan).

Of these migrants 3.0 million were from Bangladesh, 0.9 million from
Pakistan, 0.5 million from Nepal and 0.1 million from Sri Lanka.

About 65.2% of these migrants from the neighbouring countries had
migrated to India at least 20 years back perhaps at the time of partition and later during the Bangladesh war in 1971.

In comparison to 1991, there is 31.6% decline in international migration to

India (excluding J&K) in 2001. This is due to substantial decline in the
number of recent migration and death of earlier migrants due to old age.

According to this report 3 million Bangladeshi and close to one million migrants from Pakistan but you guys never make a fuzz about Pakistani migrants. That is my one point.

Out of 3 million 65% are from pre 1971 era which leaves only 1 million of recent migrant of which must be 80% of them are Hindus and which leaves only 200,000 say muslim poor migrant.

Dont you think its very normal for people of this minor number to shift border to a neighbouring country even from a richer country to a poorer country? Dont you think more than 200,000 americans live in Mexico and a far better number in Canada even though those countries are economically weaker than America?

Even we have more than 400,000 Burmese living in Bangladesh even far more numbers of Indians. We dont think that significantly reduce the job opportunity of my country neither changed any demographic complexion of my country.

My 2 cents.


PS: the report says that there is 31% decline of foreign migrant since 1991 to 2001. That means foreign migrants are finding India as lesser attractive as days passes by.
 
.
Again you are back in your La..La land.. Assamese rebels hate you.. more than they hate us...besides if you think Dhaka will start sponsoring anti-India movement it won't be bombed back to stone age?(American jargon..but like the sound of it ;))

Dhaka can invest and sponsor, that will give us big market in NE, our products has demand in there, and we will get big return of our invest. As India has been enjoying a big market in BD after our separation.
 
Last edited:
.
Dhaka should invest, that will give us big market in NE, our products has demand in there, and we will get big return of our invest. As India has been enjoying a big market in BD after our separation.

Again you are acting on the assumption Bangladesh will be able to sever northeast from India .

You do not have the military, economic or the political muscle to follow through(as India did..when it liberated Dhaka) .

Infact it is much easier for India(as we surround you on 3 sides on land and Indian navy surrounds you to south) to capture Bangladesh and lay it to waste(if such an intent was detected on Dhaka's behalf)..we are not even talking of usage nuclear weapons yet.
 
.
Denial ain't just a river in Egypt,but also in bangladesh.
 
Last edited:
. .
10 yr old data, nonetheless something to chew on. Statement 13 from page 20 of the pdf file has an interesting data. It displays 279,989 migration from 1991 to 2001. Hardly a remarkable number considering the population of Bangladesh in that period.

These are the people who reported that their last place of residence was Bangladesh and are in India legally. This doesn't include the illegal migrants. People with no documents, no proof of their existence in India can not participate in the Census. And why would they, no one in their right mind would want take part in a National Census as an illegal migrant. :undecided:
 
.
According to this report 3 million Bangladeshi and close to one million migrants from Pakistan but you guys never make a fuzz about Pakistani migrants. That is my one point.

Out of 3 million 65% are from pre 1971 era which leaves only 1 million of recent migrant of which must be 80% of them are Hindus and which leaves only 200,000 say muslim poor migrant.

Dont you think its very normal for people of this minor number to shift border to a neighbouring country even from a richer country to a poorer country? Dont you think more than 200,000 americans live in Mexico and a far better number in Canada even though those countries are economically weaker than America?

Even we have more than 400,000 Burmese living in Bangladesh even far more numbers of Indians. We dont think that significantly reduce the job opportunity of my country neither changed any demographic complexion of my country.

My 2 cents.


PS: the report says that there is 31% decline of foreign migrant since 1991 to 2001. That means foreign migrants are finding India as lesser attractive as days passes by.

10 yr old data, nonetheless something to chew on. Statement 13 from page 20 of the pdf file has an interesting data. It displays 279,989 migration from 1991 to 2001. Hardly a remarkable number considering the population of Bangladesh in that period.

I posted the data to let both BD and Indian members to know what the actual situation is like. It's better to debate based on facts rather than emotions and cry murder at the drop of a hat.

Yes, as both you and fallstuff pointed out, the immigration seems to be decreasing as GoI has become more assertive on this. The recent census will give us clearer picture once it is out.

Both Hindus and Muslims in BD were facing persecution on ethnic line in 71, so there was a reason for people to cross over and I think most of them were given citizenship, just like Tamil immigrants or Punjabi immigrants from Sri Lanka and Pakistan respectively.
 
Last edited:
.
:angry: And why will we do that?
There is a reason why we are building a fence on the border.

And 'Arabs' of Bangladesh can go back to Arabia when their land is flooded due to global warming :coffee:.

All those nomad, destitute, poor and warlike people from Arabia, central asia, north india and Bihar have domiciled in the fertile lands of Bengal. They are equally local as their Hindu predecessors from the north, Choto Nagpur, south india and north India. We do not now know who is what because all have inter-mingled among themselves as Muslims do not have a caste system.
 
.
I dont understand why these Indians are soo arrogant and out of this world. They talk like India's already a developed country. Here are some FACTS:
-According to World Bank, 456 million live below the poverty line. Thats more than the entire population of Bangladesh
-1/3 of the world poverty belongs to India, yes 1/3
-Poverty rate in Bihar and such places are considered the world's most extreme
-poverty rate is higher than 26 of the poorest african countries

Poverty in India - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
theres more...
 
.
I dont understand why these Indians are soo arrogant and out of this world. They talk like India's already a developed country. Here are some FACTS:
-According to World Bank, 456 million live below the poverty line. Thats more than the entire population of Bangladesh
-1/3 of the world poverty belongs to India, yes 1/3
-Poverty rate in Bihar and such places are considered the world's most extreme
-poverty rate is higher than 26 of the poorest african countries

Poverty in India - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
theres more...

Bangladeshis don't migrate to Bihar, do they? They have become competitors of those poor people of India living in metros like Mumbai, Calcutta. Delhi etc for want of better life. As you rightly pointed out, India already have so many poor people who needs to be taken care of, we don't want any more burden.
 
Last edited:
.
:angry: And why will we do that?
There is a reason why we are building a fence on the border.

And 'Arabs' of Bangladesh can go back to Arabia when their land is flooded due to global warming :coffee:.

In our Bangladesh, among muslims there are no more Arabs, Pathans, Turks, Negroes, Mongols, Drabirs, Brahmans, Khatiyas or Sudras. Bengal was and is a melting pot. All are regarded as Muslim Bengalis or Bangali Muslims.
 
.
Absolutely baseless Indian report. Who would go to india to change fate, where (india) worlds biggest number of poor people lives.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom