Nike
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2013
- Messages
- 13,867
- Reaction score
- 24
- Country
- Location
You found no similar Brigade Combat Team in VPA ?
not with the structural ranks and flexibility like the ones i found on Brigade Golani and among other, VPA had no comparison.
You found no similar Brigade Combat Team in VPA ?
not with the structural ranks and flexibility like i found on Brigade Golani and among other in IDF, your structure still rigid and that's why some of Vietnamese high ranking official had visit Jakarta to propose joint training and among other things to give more hintsight about the reform on VPA
just for some hintsight...
Israeli infantry corps, they like small but flexible units and so can do multiple task and mission to suit the nature of challenge and environment they must cope or dealt with. For example, Nahal or Golani or Baslamach Brigade, they had several infantry battalion with multiple skills and capability to conduct mission from air or assault type units with armor. They had Special forces unit attached on the Brigade to give them flexibility to conduct SAR type mission without resorting to General HQ units in which will give delay and compromised the possibility of element of surprise in the fields. Not to mention the fire support they had, they got them all in just one Brigade Combat Team. And that's why US Army emulate those kind of type structure and ranks to cope with the current situation they must dealt with
And then we can compared them with VPA, in which your army is divided in large structure and inflexible type of units among them. If any of your commander want to do some special forces type of jobs they must calling General HQ to get those specific type of infantry units in works, and when they want to calling artillery strike, they must ordering them from another battalion units serving under the same Division and that's came along with the bureaucracy in it.
Last edited: